The Jewish Press

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. I guess he disagrees with the Torah and Halacha which give a woman the right to choose whether or not to proceed with the pregnancy, based on her ability to provide for a child without harming herself (or shortchanging the children she may already have). As an Orthodox Jew, he should accept the fact that Hashem gave men the duty to make children, while he gave the choice to do so to women.

    Comment by Myriam Obadia — September 23, 2013 @ 3:23 PM

  2. bingo!

    Comment by Jennifer Waybright — September 23, 2013 @ 3:27 PM

  3. bingo!

    Comment by Jennifer Waybright — September 23, 2013 @ 3:27 PM

  4. I guess he disagrees with the Torah and the Halacha, which give the choice to a woman to proceed -or not- with the pregnancy based on her ability to care for herself (and the children she may already have).

    Comment by Myriam Obadia — September 23, 2013 @ 5:46 PM

  5. I guess he disagrees with the Torah and the Halacha, which give the choice to a woman to proceed -or not- with the pregnancy based on her ability to care for herself (and the children she may already have).

    Comment by Myriam Obadia — September 23, 2013 @ 5:46 PM

  6. I guess he disagrees with the Torah and the Halacha, which give the choice to a woman to proceed -or not- with the pregnancy based on her ability to care for herself (and the children she may already have).

    Comment by Myriam Obadia — September 23, 2013 @ 5:46 PM

  7. I guess he disagrees that the Torah actually says that. I would tend to rely on his scholarship and piety. Not yours.

    Comment by Michael Mostofsky — September 23, 2013 @ 5:54 PM

  8. I guess he disagrees that the Torah actually says that. I would tend to rely on his scholarship and piety. Not yours.

    Comment by Michael Mostofsky — September 23, 2013 @ 5:54 PM

  9. "Rav Soloveitchik permitted an unborn child with Tay-Sachs disease to be aborted through the sixth month," Therein lies the weakness. He permitted it until the sixth month, in the case of Tay-Sachs. Why not only until the fifth or the second, or why not up to the eighth or ninth? Why just Tay-Sachs? Is it because of personal revulsion, or a view to the "beginning of human life", or the hardships ot child or parent or both, if the child were to be let live? But what does that say about other "undesireable" conditions, other "undesirable" people – such as the senile elderly, the burdonsome, etc. ? Much better to not make the exception that the Rav makes.

    Comment by Israel, its People, and its God — September 23, 2013 @ 11:11 PM

  10. "Rav Soloveitchik permitted an unborn child with Tay-Sachs disease to be aborted through the sixth month," Therein lies the weakness. He permitted it until the sixth month, in the case of Tay-Sachs. Why not only until the fifth or the second, or why not up to the eighth or ninth? Why just Tay-Sachs? Is it because of personal revulsion, or a view to the "beginning of human life", or the hardships ot child or parent or both, if the child were to be let live? But what does that say about other "undesireable" conditions, other "undesirable" people – such as the senile elderly, the burdonsome, etc. ? Much better to not make the exception that the Rav makes.

    Comment by Israel, its People, and its God — September 23, 2013 @ 11:11 PM

  11. Michael Mostofsky you rely on whomever you wish. I am just stating a fact: the Halacha allows abortion in case the pregnancy is deleterious to the mother's health or the welfare of her other children. Baruch Hashem, I never had to make such a dreadful choice, but Hashem did give that right to me in case I needed it.

    Comment by Myriam Obadia — September 24, 2013 @ 6:24 AM

  12. "the Halacha allows abortion in case the pregnancy is deleterious to the mother's health or the welfare of her other children". In the case that pregnancy causes a weakness or backpains to the mother or some other deleterious condition, does Halacha allow an abortion? If the money for school supplies has now to be streched, at the birth of a baby, to cover four living children instead five living children in a poor family, does that halacha allow the abortion of that fifith?

    Comment by Bert Schlossberg — September 24, 2013 @ 11:42 AM

  13. "the Halacha allows abortion in case the pregnancy is deleterious to the mother's health or the welfare of her other children". In the case that pregnancy causes a weakness or backpains to the mother or some other deleterious condition, does Halacha allow an abortion? If the money for school supplies has now to be streched, at the birth of a baby, to cover four living children instead five living children in a poor family, does that halacha allow the abortion of that fifith?

    Comment by Bert Schlossberg — September 24, 2013 @ 11:42 AM

  14. It allows it in case the detriments are serious enough. I doubt very much back pain qualifies, but should the mother need to choose between not getting a cancer treated and aborting in order to receive prompt treatment, I do think the Halacha allows her to abort the fetus. The case of welfare of the other children is actually specifically mentioned by the rabbanim: a breast feeding mother who becomes pregnant is allowed to abort the new fetus, so that the baby she already has isn't deprived of his need of both the milk and the constant care of his/her mother. The Torah and Halacha always give priority to the person already alive over the potential life of a fetus.

    Comment by Myriam Obadia — September 25, 2013 @ 7:26 AM

  15. It allows it in case the detriments are serious enough. I doubt very much back pain qualifies, but should the mother need to choose between not getting a cancer treated and aborting in order to receive prompt treatment, I do think the Halacha allows her to abort the fetus. The case of welfare of the other children is actually specifically mentioned by the rabbanim: a breast feeding mother who becomes pregnant is allowed to abort the new fetus, so that the baby she already has isn't deprived of his need of both the milk and the constant care of his/her mother. The Torah and Halacha always give priority to the person already alive over the potential life of a fetus.

    Comment by Myriam Obadia — September 25, 2013 @ 7:26 AM

  16. Myriam Obadia "or the welfare of the other children".? I never heard of that heter. Can you kindly provide a source in which you say the rabbanim permit this?

    Comment by Brian Kent — September 25, 2013 @ 2:36 PM

  17. Excellent article and not what the MOs want to hear.

    Comment by Ravcherri — September 25, 2013 @ 5:35 PM

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close this window.

0.289 Powered by WordPress