Guardian Editorial Takes the Side of Morsi (or Mubarak?)
print
tell a friend
Jack Shenker
To get an idea of just how outrageous a recent Guardian editorial (on Dec. 7) defending President Morsi and criticizing the liberal opposition truly was, here are two tweets by commentators with otherwise unimpeachable Guardian Left credentials:
Here’s Guardian Cairo correspondent Jack Shenker.
Let me say once again, I totally disassociate myself from this@guardian editorial on #Egypt - it’s offensive & wrong: guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/…
Here’s ‘Comment is Free’ contributor Rachel Shabi:
What is the Guardian thinking with this awful, misleading editorial on #egypt? bit.ly/VDYy6T
Here are a few excerpts of the Guardian editorial in question:
[The crisis in Egypt] is not about the proposed constitution,…
[The opposition is engaged in] a power battle in which the aim is to unseat a democratically elected president, and to prevent a referendum and fresh parliamentary elections being held, both of which Islamists stand a good chance of winning. Morsi, for his part, is determined that both polls be held as soon as possible to reaffirm the popular mandate which he still thinks he has.
…
The opposition on the other hand has never accepted the results of freely held elections, parliamentary or presidential, and is doing everything to stop new ones being held
So, the Guardian, when faced with a choice between a Muslim Brotherhood which is ideologically opposed to true democracy and individual freedoms – a political predisposition clearly on display in Morsi’s recent decision to assume dictatorial powers - and a political opposition which is at leastmarginally progressive, chose the reactionary Islamists.
The following post by a Lebanese writer, who blogs at Karl reMarks, wrote the following piece titled ‘The Guardian’s Editorial on Egypt Re-Imagined‘, which is based on the same Dec. 7 Guardian editorial re-imagined as if it were written in January 2011, with minor changes like replacing Morsi with Mubarak.
As the crisis in Egypt develops, it is becoming increasingly clear what it is not about. It is not about the elections, or the economic crisis, or Egypt’s relationship with Israel. Nor is it about the arrangements for a successor to the president. Nor even is it about the temporary but absolute powers that the Egyptian president, Hosni Mubarak, assumed for himself – for a mere thirty years, and which will lapse the moment the Egyptian people stop making a fuss.Urging the opposition to shun dialogue, Mohamed ElBaradei said that Mubarak had lost his legitimacy. So the target of the opposition is not the constitution, or the emergency law, but Mubarak himself. What follows is a power battle in which the aim is to unseat a democratically elected president, with 88.6% of the vote, and to prevent fresh parliamentary elections being held, both of which the ruling NDP stand a good chance of winning. Mubarak, for his part, is determined that both polls be held as soon as possible to reaffirm the popular mandate which he still thinks he has.
In weighing who occupies the moral high ground, let us start with what happened on Wednesday night. That is when the crisis, sparked by yet another Mubarak decree when he was at the height of his domestic popularity over the role he played in stopping the yet another Israeli assault on Gaza, turned violent. The NDP party sanctioned a violent assault on a peaceful encampment of opposition supporters in Tahrir Square. But lethal force came later, and the NDP was its principle victims. NDP offices were attacked up and down the country, while no other party offices were touched. This does not fit the opposition’s narrative to be the victims of state violence. Both sides are victims of violence and the real perpetrators are their common enemy.
Mubarak undoubtedly made grave mistakes. In pre-empting decisions by the courts to derail his reforms, his decrees were cast too wide. His laws have many faults, although none are set in stone. The opposition on the other hand has never accepted the results of freely held elections, parliamentary or presidential, and is doing everything to stop new ones being held.
The Guardian is not only supporting a racist, antisemitic, anti-Christian, anti-West Islamist movement, but are remaining loyal even when a more liberal alternative is possible.
tell a friendAbout the Author: Adam Levick serves as Managing Editor of CiF Watch, an affiliate of the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA), and is a member of the Online Antisemitism Working Group for the Global Forum to Combat Antisemitism. Adam made Aliyah from Philadelphia in 2009 and lives with his wife in Modi'in.
You might also be interested in:
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
- Flatbush Yeshiva: Bumping Students from Plane Was not Anti-Semitic
on June 18, 2013 6:41 PM - Turbulent Middle East Guarantees Increased US Arms for Israel
on June 18, 2013 6:22 PM - Russia Claims Iran Ready to Stop Enrichment of 20% uranium
on June 18, 2013 4:58 PM - Robert DeNiro and Peres Talk About Iran
on June 18, 2013 4:00 PM - Dov Hikind’s Mother Dies at 85; Burial Today
on June 18, 2013 3:22 PM - Screams of Rabin Blood Libel after Fake Posting of Lapid as Hitler
on June 18, 2013 2:51 PM - Ed Koch’s Tombstone Bears Wrong Year of Birth
on June 18, 2013 2:21 PM - Women of the Kotel Rev Up the Provocation with a Sefer Torah
on June 18, 2013 2:00 PM - 98-Year-Old Charged with Execution, Torture of Jews
on June 18, 2013 1:28 PM - Park Slope Welcomes Anthony Weiner with Open Arms
on June 18, 2013 11:40 AM - Clinton’s $500K Advice: Learn to Live with Palestinian State
on June 18, 2013 11:01 AM - Orthodox Yeshiva Graduates Class of Female Leaders
on June 18, 2013 10:51 AM - Bennett: Police Got ‘Wide Powers’ to Catch ‘Price Tag’ Activists
on June 18, 2013 10:22 AM - The RCA Supports Rabbi David Stav
on June 18, 2013 8:04 AM - Film of Israeli Rape Victim Who Became Miss World, at AFI
on June 18, 2013 6:19 AM
2
Loading ...