web analytics
February 1, 2015 / 12 Shevat, 5775
 
At a Glance
Blogs
Sponsored Post


Home » Blogs » CIFWatch »

Guardian Wants 5 Million Returned to Where They Never Lived

The number of actual Palestinian refugees from the Arab-Israeli War, out of the initial 750,000 or so after the war, is estimated to be closer to 30,000.
Mural in Dheishe “refugee” camp

Mural in Dheishe “refugee” camp

Those who get their news from the mainstream media (or the Guardian) could be forgiven for believing that there are nearly 5 million Palestinian refugees from the 1948-49 Arab-Israeli War.

So often is that figure bandied around that most don’t understand that it only reflects the number of Palestinians qualifying for “refugee” benefits under the bizarre formula of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency by which the children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren (ad infinitum) of actual refugees continue to inherit this status.  This designation is even bestowed upon those Palestinians who are already citizens of other countries.

(Using such demographic calculus, one could argue that – based on the number of Israelis whose ancestors fled Europe during the Holocaust, or fled Arab countries due to antisemitic persecution – the majority of Israeli citizens are “refugees”.)

Indeed, the number of actual Palestinian refugees from the Arab-Israeli War, out of the initial 750,000 or so after the war, is estimated to be closer to 30,000.

This data is important to remember as we follow media reports on recently renewed negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians – specifically the issue of how to deal with Palestinian demands that some or all of the “refugees” be allowed to “return” to Israel.

Unsurprisingly, Harriet Sherwood’s two recent reports on negotiations in Washington both included passages with characteristically misleading passages about the issue.

A July 29th story by Sherwood titled ‘Middle East peace talks rebooted as Netanyahu and Abbas mull legacies‘ included the following:

the issue of borders is relatively simple compared with what seem to be unbridgeable gaps concerning Jerusalem, which both sides want as a capital, but whose division or sharing is adamantly rejected by Israel, and the matter of whether at least some of the 4.9 million Palestinian refugees in the West Bank, Gaza, East Jerusalem and the diaspora will be allowed to return to their pre-1948 homes, as the Palestinians insist.

Additionally, her July 30th report, ‘Middle East Peace Talks Under Way‘, included this:

Other, even more difficult, issues – such as the future of Jerusalem, which both sides want as a capital, and whether any of the 4.9m Palestinian refugees can return to their former homes, now in Israel – would have to be addressed over the coming months.

Of course, both passages would leave the average reader with the false impression that there are 4.9 million Palestinians who had homes in Israel, when, in reality, the overwhelming majority of them were obviously born after 1949 and never set one foot within the boundaries of the Jewish state.

Whatever the outcome of current negotiations between the two parties, and regardless of any diplomatic comprises proposed by either side to achieve a symbolic settlement of the “refugee” issue, Israel naturally won’t let Palestinian Arabs “return” to homes that they never actually owned, in cities where they never once lived.

Finally, it’s interesting to note that the Guardian has, on two recent occasions, completely whitewashed the historically undisputed ethnic cleansing of Jews by Arab rulers in the years following the 1948 war, yet parrots a Palestinian narrative falsely imputing such a victim status onto millions of Palestinians who never during the course of their lives were actual refugees.

The Guardian narrative is at times as ahistorical as it is ideological.

Visit CIFWatch.

About the Author: Adam Levick serves as Managing Editor of CiF Watch, an affiliate of the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA), and is a member of the Online Antisemitism Working Group for the Global Forum to Combat Antisemitism. Adam made Aliyah from Philadelphia in 2009 and lives with his wife in Modi'in.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

7 Responses to “Guardian Wants 5 Million Returned to Where They Never Lived”

  1. Stanley Roth says:

    Harriet Sherwood who really should learn her facts about the refugee's. I think that those who wrote for the Manchester Guardian would have written the whole truth and not made make things up.

  2. What about all the Jews who were kick out from Muslim lands.Could they go back and recover all their lost possession?

  3. Tim Upham says:

    The majority of Palestinians were born after 1948. Return back to a place, they have never seen before. Their grandparents houses would now be an industrial park.

  4. A reality check – nobody really knows how many "Palestinians" there are and never have known.

    First off the definition of a "Palestinian Refugee" versus the Geneva Convention definition is way different. For an Arab that means somebody that lived for less than 2 years in the Mandate (which is not enough for residency in any country in the world). For the Geneva Convention – their entire life. Second once the war ended the UN asked who was a "Palestinian" – the original count was between 360-420,000. Well 750,000 claimed to be "refugees" for free food, housing, medical, schools, etc.

    Of the 360-420,000 less than 1,000 would be considered refugees under the Geneva Convention.

    There are no "Palestinian Refugees" it is all a scam.

  5. Hazel Armstrong says:

    No surprise. The Guardian is a cheerleader for the Islamification of England. It supports Sharia Law in Muslim no-go areas and the legal oppression of any indigenous or integrated immigrant who voices dissent at their huge swathes of England now transformed into Karachi and Islamabad.

  6. Hazel Armstrong says:

    No surprise. The Guardian is a cheerleader for the Islamification of England. It supports Sharia Law in Muslim no-go areas and the legal oppression of any indigenous or integrated immigrant who voices dissent at their huge swathes of England now transformed into Karachi and Islamabad.

  7. Yechiel Baum says:

    most of those were British so off to London and Ireland they should go.

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
The United States condemned Iran for honoring Hezbollah terrorist Imad Mughniyeh but is not so bothered when Abbas honors PA terrorists.
CIA, Mossad Collaborated on Killing Hezbollah No. 2 Leader in Damascus
Latest Blogs Stories
Ultra Orthodox Jewish youths studying religious texts at a Yeshiva in Jerusalem

In the Hareidi world, Torah study is worshipped to the exclusion of all else. Nothing else matters

IDF vehicles attacked by Hezbollah with anti-tank missiles at northern border.

Chances are, like in the South, terrorists are building a sophisticated network of tunnels in North.

Hezbollah shooting at Har Dov

9:31pm The Mt. Hermon ski resort on the Golan Heights will be open for business tomorrow morning — having receiving permission from the IDF. 8:03pm Channel 2 reports that Hezbollah terror cell was located 5 kilometers from Israel, and not within Israel as originally thought.Soldiers in 2nd vehicle were saved after they jumped out of […]

Jordana Brown: Ready, willing, and able!

I need a job, my friends. A real life, full-time, pay-the-bills, up at 7, home-after-nightfall JOB!

Ha’aretz claiming Glick is “far from a household name to non-English speaking Israelis” is erroneous

Distinguishing between manipulating and influencing people + 3 steps towards positive communication

Despite “excuses” about not wanting to influence Israel’s election Netanyahu’s views should be heard

Israeli leaders deny reality: Nothing we can do will make the Arabs accept a viable Jewish state

How do we make sure the Holocaust is relevant to new generations?

In 2006, Amona kids saw their teachers and rabbis being thrown from windows as if they were garbage

No money should go to terrorists or their families; anyone involved in terror must pay the price

Responsible Jewish outreach encourages BTs to retain and to enhance their relationship with parents

Israelis will vote for Likud because of Caroline Glick, but she’ll just be Right window dressing.

What are the dynamics of running a family business and what are its impact on family relationships?

The Hareidi paper HaMevaser wanted to have their cake and eat it too: use the photo; lose the women

Producer Chuck Wang explains how you can learn from mistakes and move on towards success.

More Articles from Adam Levick
Car in Light Rail Runover

If you’re a Palestinian and get an urge to do something that might cause Jews to stop living-don’t!

.

Amnesty International:The crippling of the power station was “collective punishment of Palestinians”

The bill (by Senator Robert Menendez, along with 58 co-sponsors) has been accurately described by multiple media sources.

One Israeli media outlet steadfastly refuses to set the record straight.

You don’t even need to believe that antisemitism is at play to be contemptuous of the extraordinary myopia displayed in the Guardian report.

To learn more about the story we contacted Anne Herzberg, NGO Monitor’s legal advisor.

This [particular] Volunteer Soldiers’ Basic Training was extra special.

Pretending that the facts of the Holocaust are a matter of serious historical dispute is a classic rhetorical evasion.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/blogs/cifwatch/guardian-wants-5-million-returned-to-where-they-never-lived/2013/07/30/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: