web analytics
August 29, 2015 / 14 Elul, 5775
At a Glance
Blogs
Sponsored Post


MEDIA IDIOTS

The Peerless Cluelessness of Thomas Friedman

No one represents Friedman's disgusting characterization of bigoted, menacing, trigger-happy European Jews more than Menachem Begin.
Tom friedman an idiot

A reader who commented on my Thomas Friedman article last week at The Algemeiner pointed me to a stupefyingly ludricous passage in Friedman’s celebrated book, “From Beirut to Jerusalem,” pp 126-127:

Ariel Sharon never sent Yasir Arafat flowers.

Whatever one thinks of the former Israeli general and Defense Minister, Sharon did not play games with his enemies. He killed them. After a few years in Beirut, I came to understand a little why the Jews had a state and the Palestinians didn’t. The European Jews who built Israel came out of a culture of sharp edges and right angles. They were cold, hard men who always understood the difference between success and failure, and between words and deeds. Because the Jews were always a nation apart, they developed their own autonomous institutions and had to rely on their own deep tribal sense of solidarity. This gave them a certain single-mindedness of purpose. They would never settle for a substitute homeland; life for them was not just another Mediterranean life cycle or fatalistic shrug.

The single-mindedness of the European Zionists also had a certain ruthless aspect to it. They emerged from ghettos in which they were never invited by the outside world to drink coffee. They were never part of a Middle Eastern kaleidoscope, like Lebanon, where today’s enemy could be tomorrow’s friend. For the Jews coming out of Europe, today’s enemy was tomorrow’s enemy. The world was divided into two: the Jews and the goyim, or Gentiles. The Arabs, for the Zionists, fell into two subsets of goyim—agents and enemies. Agents you ordered and enemies you killed.

The rhythm of life in the Arab world was always different. Men in Arab societies always tended to bend more; life there always moved in ambiguous semicircles, never right angles. The religious symbols of the West are the cross and the Jewish star—both of which are full of sharp, angled turns. The symbol of the Muslim East is the crescent moon—a wide, soft, ambiguous arc. In Arab society there was always some way to cushion failure with rhetoric and enable the worst of enemies to sit down and have coffee together, maybe even send each other bouquets.

This passage is incomprehensibly idiotic on so many levels. Besides the obvious – do I really have to point out how inane his point about religious symbols is? –  Friedman is generalizing his experiences in relatively cosmopolitan and liberal Beirut to the Arab world as a whole.

Sure, Arabs love to have coffee – but the idea that this means they accept compromise with Jews is the exact inversion of the truth.

No one represents Friedman’s disgusting characterization of bigoted, menacing, trigger-happy European Jews more than Menachem Begin. You know – the person who traded territory that was double the size of Israel itself for a piece of paper.

The real Arab world is a place where antisemitism is mainstream and where rejectionism of Israel  is absolute even in countries that have “peace treaties” with Israel. It is the Arabs who have announced boycotts of Jews since the 1920s, Arabs who stated the “three no’s” of Khartoum, Arabs who accuse even Hamas terrorists of being too pro-Israel.

Even in Friedman’s wonderful, tolerant Beirut, we see absolute rejection of anything that tastes remotely Zionist.

It is the Arabs who utterly reject normalization with Israel, and those hardheaded European Jews who want to be accepted in the Middle East. (The Jews from the Arab world tend to be more hawkish, because they understand the mentality of the Arabs a lot better than Friedman does.)

Oh, I think its also a fair bet that moderate, compromising Arafat never sent Ariel Sharon flowers either.

How can anyone take Friedman seriously after reading trash like this?

(h/t Gary)

Visit Elder of Ziyon.

About the Author: Elder blogs at http://elderofziyon.blogspot.co.il/

The author's opinion does not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Jewish Press.

If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

7 Responses to “The Peerless Cluelessness of Thomas Friedman”

  1. Dov Grauman says:

    And yet his garbage is still published.

  2. Dov Grauman says:

    And yet his garbage is still published.

  3. Jewish Press why are you retweeting other publications' articles? Why aren't you building your brand? I can read this article directly from its source, if I do then I don't need to be exposed to your sponsors ads.

  4. Jon Grauman says:

    Benjamin Anthony Grauman

  5. The crescent moon reflects just a small portion of the light coming from the sun. The rest of the moon is covered in darkness. When standing in front of a source of light such as a sun, there is no darkness. No place for men to hide their dark deeds. And even a full moon is incapable of producing the photosynthesis needed to support life on earth. I don't know about all the sharp angles of the Star of David or the "ambiguous arch", but I do know that a star can support life while the darkened moon cannot. A scythe is also a crescent shape. I'm not a big fan of sharp angles myself, but I'll take my chances with the original source of light, not a twisted reflection of it.

  6. Stuart Creque says:

    Yes, scythes are crescent-shaped. So are the blades of scimitars. And the wide, soft arc of the scimitar is also a symbol of Islam (the 'saif al-Islam', or 'sword of submission').

  7. David Carlton Dickson says:

    Um. . . he later in the same chapter talks about the Holocaust, and how many of same "cold, hard" men ended up cold and hard for a very valid reason. Many of their friends and family were murdered, most of them butchered by their neighbors in Europe. Yeah, compared even to the most uncompromising of Arabs, Israelis have more incentive to be "ruthless" than pretty much anyone. I wouldn't call that a slander. I'd call it a mark in their favor. Coming from Friedman, to a degree, it's grudging admiration.

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Swiss Amb. to Iran Giulo Haas presents his credentials to Iranian Pres. Rouhani
‘US and Iranian Cartoon Doves’ Shown Defecating on Bibi by Swiss Amb to Iran
Latest Blogs Stories
haredim-no-women-allowed-sign

The Halacha of shmirat einayim (guarding one’s eyes) is incumbent on the MAN; it’s his obligation

Doug Goldstein

Dem. presidential candidate Doug Shreffler talks about his campaign & its motto “as good as it gets”

Jewish Press Blogger, Jordana Brown

I’ve decided to move away from my safety net-and I wouldn’t change that decision for anything.

Was “Jerusalem” the song Matisyahu planned to perform? It was the PERFECT response to BDS campaign

If the world’s winds of hatred bring Jews to Israel we are ready, joyfully offering them a home here

At what age should the realization start setting in for kids that we live in an uncertain society?

Spain’s SeaWorld canceled Zionist-spy dolphin’s performance unless it supports a Palestinian state

How does the Iranian deal affect anti-terrorist legislation adopted by a number of US states?

Shabbat afternoon soccer games, a tradition in Israel’s league, may become a thing of the past.

Calling the Jewish Press‘closest thing to a frum English-language weekly’ insults the publication

So long as Jews dance for the sheer pleasure of thanking God, Israel will never be defeated!

Why are wealthy people less likely to gossip? So if you get rich you’ll cut down on Lashon Hora!

Matisyahu was bounced from a music festival because he wouldn’t sign pro-BDS, anti-Israel manifesto.

Danon is still young, perhaps one day he’ll succeed Bibi. Representing Israel in UN is good training

I think it has been a major tactical mistake for Israel to consider Iran a particularly Israeli problem. And it is of crucial importance for Israel and Israelis to stop thinking that we have any influence on international leaders when it comes to anything, including international policy re: Iran. That’s why I think that Yair […]

More Articles from Elder of Ziyon
The Kotel, 1913

This year it is hard to concentrate on anything but Iran building nuclear weapons to destroy Israel

The more accurate name for "Amnesty International"

To Amnesty International bashing Israel’s far more important than small details like truth&accuracy

“While neither leader(Obama/Bibi) monopolized mistakes, only 1 leader made them deliberately(Obama)”

The contrast between a Dem pretending to love Israel & a Dem who truly loves Israel is CRYSTAL CLEAR

The UNHRC chose Schabas because of his well-known attitudes towards Israel, not in spite of them!

There is no question whatsoever that Odeh was behind the fatal bombing of a SuperSol market in 1969

Beware of the “creative license” reporters and spokespeople take to claim maximal harm to Gazans by Israel.

Pope asked to dine with poor families, but church leaders instead use locals as props to slam Israel!

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/blogs/elder-of-ziyon/the-peerless-cluelessness-of-thomas-friedman/2013/11/24/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: