web analytics
July 22, 2014 / 24 Tammuz, 5774
Israel at War: Operation Protective Edge
 
 
At a Glance
Blogs
Sponsored Post
IDC Advocacy Room IDC Fights War on Another Front

Student Union opens ‘hasbara’ room in effort to fill public diplomacy vacuum.



The Proper Response to the ASA Boycott of Israel

flag and mosque

In the middle of December, an academic organization called the American Studies Association (ASA) issued a statement in which they endorsed a boycott of Israel. The boycott was their response to their assessment of the treatment of Palestinians by Israel. About 800 members voted in favor of the boycott.

There have been several strong reactions to this statement as well as many important matter of context that must be discussed.

First, the NY Times reports that the ASA is an organization with few members and little influence. A Google search for ASA reveals that the American Studies Association doesn’t even make the first page of result. A professor friend confirmed that the ASA is not a well regarded association and no one really cares what they say. It’s a small corner of academia that mostly teaches American history and politics. So when opponents try to paint all academics as Israel’s enemies based on this boycott, it’s simply untrue. In fact, the much larger and more influential American Association of University Professors opposes the boycott!

(By the way, it’s interesting that the NY Times chose to use a photo of Israeli Arab students at an Israeli University in Haifa.)

Second, the boycott is not really a boycott. It sounds fancy, but the actual teeth of the boycott are anything but sharp. The boycott calls for American universities to cease cooperation with Israeli universities. It does not boycott the professors or scholars or anything else that Israel does or produces. So when opponents of the ASA make arguments like “Haha, the ASA is hypocritical because they use Israeli developed technology everyday! Haha!” It really does not address the actual boycott.

Third, Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian authority actually opposes the boycott too. His position is that anything that is actually produced outside the 1948 borders should be subject to boycott. But not everything inside Israel.

But the thing I was left wondering after seeing the initial statement and the various responses that were written and spoken in defense of Israel was what data the ASA was using to justify its boycott? They make unequivocal statements about the lack of academic freedom for Palestinians. Are these allegations true? Even if they are true, we wouldn’t have to agree that the solution is to boycott Israel. But we should be concerned enough to learn what circumstances led the ASA to reach this conclusion. Once we’ve determined their basis for the boycott we can decide whether they raise legitimate issues or valid complaints. I’ve not seen anything seeking to address their specific grievances that are the basis for their boycott.

The truth is that the ASA did not enumerate these claims in their initial statement. But a recent op-ed in the LA Times by one signer of the boycott sheds light on their position. I have organized the issues she raises. I don’t know that any of these claims are true or false or if Israel can be blamed for any of the true claims. She makes two specific claims:

1. On our first day in Bethlehem, my husband and I met a young man who had received a scholarship from George Mason University in Virginia but was not granted an exit visa by the Israeli authorities. Instead of embarking on a promising journey in academia, this young Palestinian had to resign himself to a job selling souvenirs to tourists. We learned that Palestinian students of all ages endure harassment at military checkpoints, frequent school closures, unprovoked arrests, imprisonment and sometimes death at the hands of trigger-happy soldiers.

2. Within Israel proper, schools are segregated and, following the model of the Jim Crow South, the government allocates significantly less funding to Palestinian schools, which are often overcrowded and understaffed. Palestinian university professors in Gaza rarely receive permission to travel abroad for conferences, those in the West Bank also face difficulties, and international faculty have been prevented from visiting Palestinian universities.

Additionally, she says that the boycott is intended to give a voice to those who support Palestinians on college campuses. By standing up to Israel, the hope is that the popular, automatic assumption that Israel is in the right will be challenged. These supporters are often subject to unfair treatment in her view. She cites a few examples.

I found this interesting because I have become so accustomed to hearing that college campuses are so incredibly anti-Israel that supporters of Israel are subject to discrimination. I guess it’s all a matter of perception.

She also explains that anti-Israel is not anti-Jew or anti-Semitic. This is because the ASA resolution does not target people or ethnicities. Instead it targets institutions that are complicit in human rights violations. By targeting those acting instead of the kind of people who are like those acting, the resolution is not a form of ethnic bigotry.

Finally, she argues that while there are far graver humanitarian issues around the world, the relationship between Israel and the United States justifies singling out Israel. Also, the USA has undermined humanitarian efforts in Israel by vetoing UN resolutions condemning Israel.

It’s so important to understand the claims of those who seek to boycott Israel. They have actual grievances. If their grievances are addressed with competing facts we have a chance of rebutting their claims. Upping the rhetoric and organizing counter boycotts does little to actually discuss the issues. Instead it turns into a war that will be won with the group that has greater public support and resources. That’s just a modern version of “might makes right.” We should be focused on “right makes right.”

If the grievances are true, I can understand why some people feel compelled to organize a limited boycott. Even if I wouldn’t join the boycott myself, I can empathize with their concerns. Wouldn’t any of us prefer that the two substantive examples she cites be untrue? And if they were true, would we not want to fix the problems? I know I would.

I don’t have any first hand data to rebut the claims made in this op-ed. I am sure there are those who can confirm if these policies are real, or explain why these policies exist if they are true, or who is to blame for these policies, or maybe agree that some policies should actually be adjusted. But we need to tone down the rhetoric on both sides and begin to solve the problems. That’s the real solution to BDS and accusations of apartheid in Israel. Showing examples of equality and freedom is not sufficient. Each specific claim should be handled and addressed sufficiently. Let’s get on the same page and fix the misconceptions or errors, whichever it is, it doesn’t really matter.

Visit Fink or Swim.

About the Author: Rabbi Eliyahu Fink, J.D. is the rabbi at the famous Pacific Jewish Center | The Shul on the Beach in Venice CA. He blogs at finkorswim.com. Connect with Rabbi Fink on Facebook and Twitter.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

Please use the Facebook Tab below to leave your comment:

7 Responses to “The Proper Response to the ASA Boycott of Israel”

  1. Bill Bilek says:

    "I don’t know that any of these claims are true or false"
    Really????!!!!

  2. Robin Birdfish says:

    Im really confused by this article. The title says 'the proper response to the ASA boycott..' and yet all the author posts are one of the boycotters reasons for boycotting…while he admits he doesn't know if they are true.. including one that states Israeli schools are segregated.While it is true that most schools are segregated, it's because they teach religion as part of their culture and most towns are segregated…in integrated towns there are integrated schools that have Jewish and Muslim teachers with Jewish and Muslim students…it is not (unlike apartheid south Africa) a law that they must be segregated. How can the author list the boycotter's reasons for the boycott without attempting to find out if there is truth to them if he is offering ways to respond to the boycott?

  3. Tony Kats says:

    Muslims do not want to be seating with Jews,also Muslims kill gays ,also Muslims do not like women to drive.Also if terrorist survive after attack ,they are treated in Israeli hospitals .Israel delivers water ,electricity ,natural gas to ungrateful Arabs .I was a sergeant in Soviet Army .Let me tell you :Russians or any other nation would not help killers of their kids .And let me tell you – all boycotts of Israel perpetrated by hardcore Nazis and Jew-haters ,who disguise themselves as truth seekers .Shame on ASA for following Nazi propaganda ! ASA members have to face the truth – they are bunch of Jew hating academia and they will be punished by G-D .

  4. Myriam Obadia says:

    The author seems very nice and very morally upright, but suffers from an inconvenient blind spot.
    1) Just like in the Schengen space, the US, Canada, etc. the only people in need of an exit visa from the Israeli authorities are foreign residents. The problem with the majority of "Palestinians" is that they never bothered legalizing their situation in 1967, when the Jordanian Army left Judea-Samaria (aka: West Bank). As illegal residents, they cannot request such a document from Israel and must address themselves to Syria, Jordan, Egypt, or Saudi Arabia, depending where their grandparents came from.
    2) Israeli public schools and universities aren't at all segregated, but they teach in Hebrew. Since the majority of Arabs living in Israel -whether or not they are Israeli citizens- wish for their children to be schooled in Arabic, they send their children to Arab schools. This is a right, not an obligation.
    3) Anyone who resides beyond the "green line" has to go through the checkpoints, whether they are Jews, Christians, or Muslims. Yes it's inconvenient, but there isn't any common measure between a twice a day inconvenience and the plague visited by terrorists on the civilian population before the "wall" was put in place.

  5. Gregory Bernstein says:

    Here's an article published in the Vanderbilt Political Review which weighs in on the ASA boycott http://www.vanderbiltpoliticalreview.com/?p=2976

  6. What a terrible message this article sends. That ASA "is not a well regarded association and no one really cares what they say" is clearly, clearly negated by the empirical fact that this and other newspapers (including, as mentioned in the article, the NY Times) are covering it. There are other problems with the article, but that's the most glaring, and, in my opinion, relevant. Defaming organizations for decisions arrived at democratically seems a low, and in my opinion, reprehensible, tactic. Shameful.

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Loading Facebook Comments ...
Loading Disqus Comments ...
Current Top Story
Golani 13
1 MIA as IDF Names 6 Additional Members of the Golani 13
Latest Blogs Stories
Socks

If you are lloking to buy socks, this store is NOT where to go! B”H

Jewish Mother (ca. 1906), carved ivory by Boris Schatz.
Courtesy Kestenbaum & Company.

Ruthie Blum reveals just how hard it is for a Jewish mother to be a patriot at the time of war. Maternal cognitive dissonance On Thursday night, after 10 days of aerial warfare between Hamas terrorists and Israel, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu approved a ground incursion into Gaza. It was a move that much of […]

IDF Chief of Staff, Benny Gantz talking to the media.

JoeSettler takes on the IDF Spokesperson’s tweets that he believes are morally wrong and negatively affect the war we are fighting…

Goldstein

The 7 Decisions that changed author Andy Andrews’ life and how they can guide you towards success.

Not asking the world for the right to defend ourselves; such a right is obvious to anyone with a spine.

Where has all the billions of Euros and dollars that have been poured into Gaza over the years gone?

One wishes the PA would distance itself completely from Hamas now for the sake of peace and development in the region.

Israel will never be the underdog, so no defense will be legitimized.

In a war, people die; all Israelis should know that by now.

“We thought they wanted a state; it turns out that all they want is to destroy Israel”

It’s called Operation Protective Edge and is a double-edged sword.

The majority of the Israeli public is against a ceasefire with Hamas at this time.

Bibi knew back then what needed to be done. So why isn’t PM Netanyahu listening to his younger self?

If eligible, are their benefits to claiming Spanish citizenship?

Suggestion: Along with not eating and drinking let us “fast” today from other indulgences…

More Articles from Rabbi Eliyahu Fink
Dusk in the early morning hours seen from Mt Meron, Northern Israel. March 26, 2014.

What do we do when we want to be mad at God but we also want God to make it all better? Indeed, what do we do?

Are donations from immoral people acceptable?

Rambam would also allow charity from a mumar as long as the person maintains basic belief in God and Judaism.

There is no song that tells the story of freedom like Shir HaShirim.

It is unfair to judge a 52 year old man with the glasses of a person who lives in a different world.

Adegbile was not making a moral statement by representing a man convicted of killing a cop.

Women learning Torah is becoming increasingly permissive, but women wearing tefillin is becoming increasingly stringent.

When the “offensive” statements in our Talmud were stated, no one thought they were offensive.

Both communities value using books to study their texts, and digital devices are a less preferable way for younger people to study.

    Latest Poll

    Israel's Iron Dome Anti-Missile System:





    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/blogs/fink-or-swim/the-proper-response-to-the-asa-boycott-of-israel/2013/12/31/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: