Latest update: December 13th, 2012
This is the third entry in an in depth series about the composition of the Likud’s list of candidates for the Knesset, which the Israeli media was quick to condemn as representing a significant shift to the right. I previously discussed the fact that the primary portion of the Likud’s list (the top 25, pre-merger with Yisrael Beitenu) mostly comprises current members of the Likud’s Knesset faction. Yesterday’s entry, discussed the fact that most shocked the media – that Benny Begin, Mickey Eitan and Dan Meridor did not achieve secure spots – why they lost out and why this does not represent any sort of rightward shift.
But in addition to those three, there were a number of other current faction members who are not in the top 25 of the current list. As discussed previously, of the Likud’s top 25, three spots were reserved for new candidates. That leaves 22 for existing faction members, who number 27 in total.
So five were destined to lose. There were also two new faces in the first 22, one ideological (Moshe Feiglin) and one non-ideological (Tzachi HaNegbi). So that means seven current members did not make it in. Begin, Eitan and Meridor were three of them.
The other four were Minister of Communication Moshe Kahlon and Minister without Portfolio Yossi Peled, Deputy Minister for Pensioner Affairs Leah Nas and junior MK Tzion Pinyan. Kahlon and Peled announced they would not be competing in advance of the primaries.
Nas and Pinyan were simply not very active and did not mount much of a campaign. Pinyan was favored by at least one settlement-based faction, and wore a kippah srugah (the national-religious skull cap) but was virtually unknown. If even a Likud insider were quizzed on all the members of the Likud’s faction, Pinyan’s name would be the first they would forget.
He also arrived in the Knesset with a very small number of votes in a district spot reserved for new candidates, so from the beginning he had an uphill battle, one he did not meet.
As a deputy minister, Nas was favored by Netanyahu. Her husband who ran her campaign told me a few weeks before the primaries that Netanyahu said she was the most effective minister in the government or something like that. On the other hand, she was also considered right-wing. She voted against the Disengagement. According to Jeremy Saltan, who was deeply involved in the negotiations over “Hok Hasdarah,” Nas almost quit the government over its opposition to the pro-settlement bill and of Likud ministers who initially supported the bill but then either voted against or absented themselves, she was one of the last to drop her support of the bill (in the end she absented herself from the vote). Overall she falls on the more nationalist side of the spectrum, so a Likud without her cannot be said to be a more right-wing Likud.
Her fatal mistake was not being too right-wing or left-wing, but a lack of political activity. If the average Likud member was quizzed on the members of the Likud’s faction, after Tzion Pinyan, her name would be most likely to be left off the list.
Nevertheless, both Nas and Pinyan received a respectable number of votes. Pinyan received a little over 14 thousand, more than was previously required to enter the list in 2008, while Nas received a very respectable 20 thousand, more than twice what was required in the last primaries and less than a thousand shy of Carmel Shama HaCohen who was the last candidate on the national list to get a realistic spot.
As previously discussed, after spot number 21, there were 15 district and demographic spots for new candidates and then came the rest of the national candidates. If not for those spots, Nas would have been number 25 on the Likud’s list.
What made it tougher for candidates like Nas and Pinyon, and even more so for Begin, Meridor and Eitan was the fact that a slew of Kadima members were introduced. As mentioned, of the first 25 spots, three were reserved for new candidates. That leaves 22 spots for 27 existing faction members. Kahlon and Peled left, but HaNegbi and Feiglin were strong ‘new’ candidates from the outset. So five MKs were destined to lose their jobs from the outset.
Then, in addition to HaNegbi and Feiglin, there were the Kadima candidates who received some type of public endorsement/encouragement from Netanyahu: Kadima Avi Dichter, Meir Shitreet, and Yulia Shamlov Berkovitz. Thus as the number of spots for sitting MKs were reduced, more sitting MKs were introduced into the competition. Those Kadima MKs should never have been competing in the Likud primaries in the first place as they do not agree with the Likud’s principles (and to become a member one sign a paper saying one “identifies” with those principles). They only sapped potential votes from others favored by Netanyahu.
So if there is any lesson for Netanyahu or the more “centrist” forces in the Likud, perhaps it is to not to back too many candidates, but instead to focus on the success of a few and do what is necessary for them. In this case, it probably would not have made a difference, but how not backing too many candidates can help other candidates will be the subject of tomorrow’s entry which will tackles the criticism that a “deal-system” exists within the party. This criticism was correct, but it is not limited to the Likud but to all parties that have primaries and it is a symptom of a wider problem, Israel’s terrible political system.
In sum, the failure of these candidates, like the failure of Begin, Meridor and Eitan, does not represent an ideological shift, but a failure to actively campaign, make the right alliances and poor political judgment – especially on the part of those ex-Kadima MKs.Daniel Tauber
About the Author: Daniel Tauber is the Executive Director of Likud Anglos, and a former Opinions Editor at JewishPress.com. Daniel is also an attorney admitted to practice law in Israel and New York and received his J.D. from Fordham University School of Law. You can follow him on facebook and twitter.The author's opinion does not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Jewish Press.
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.
If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.