web analytics
April 19, 2015 / 30 Nisan, 5775
At a Glance
Blogs
Sponsored Post


An Analysis of the Presidential Candidates

Mitt Romney in Jerusalem

Mitt Romney in Jerusalem
Photo Credit: Yoav Ari Dudkevitch/Flash90

http://haemtza.blogspot.co.il/2012/07/an-analysis-of-presidential-candidates.html

Mitt Romney went to the Kotel on Sunday. It was quite a sight. But not an unusual one for a candidate running for the highest office in the land. Nor was all the pro-Israel rhetoric that unusual – especially at a fundraising event in Jerusalem.  Watching all of this on the TV news on Sunday night made me think about the upcoming Presidential election. I thought I would do a snap analysis of the candidates as they stand now and see whether either of them deserves my support.

I have come to the conclusion that where it matters the most to me – the security of the State of Israel and the overall welfare of the Jewish people, there is virtually no difference between them. Both President Barack Obama and former Governor Mitt Romney would be “good for the Jews.”

This may come as a shock to Obama haters and Romney supporters, but any fair analysis of the candidates cannot help but see them this way. A lot of the Jewish opposition to the President has been because of things that are not of any substantive value.

For example there is the fact that the President has not visited Israel… or the time he said that any treaty between Palestinians should be based on the pre-’67 border lines …or his criticisms over Israel’s settlement polices … or the less-than-warm relationship with Israel’s prime  minister.

If one looks at these issues and measures them over substantive ones – like Israel’s security, Obama has a magnificent record – one that surpasses any of his predecessors.  He has helped fund Israel’s Iron Dome defense system over and above the foreign aid allocated to them.  He recently approved additional millions in foreign aid to Israel.  He has instituted the greatest level of intelligence co-operation in Israel’s history. Same thing is true about joint military exercises. Both are at unprecedented levels. He has also insisted that one of his most important foreign policy goals is preventing Iran from getting nuclear weapons.

That’s just a partial list of things he’s done to show his ‘unshakeable’ support for the State. I therefore do not buy the argument made by the anti Obama forces that President will put any more pressure on Israel after the election. If this is being anti Israel – I’ll take it!

The non-substantive issues are virtually irrelevant in light of all these pluses. Sure, I’d like for him to have visited Israel at least once during his Presidency, but what difference does it really make? Sure I’d like him to have warmer relations with Israel’s prime minister… but again as it affects Israel’s security – what difference does that really make?

What about his rhetoric with respect to Israel’s settlements policy? His statements hardly differ from policies the US has had in past administrations. Why pick on him? For example let us look at the pre-’67 border statement. He didn’t say that Israel had to go back to the exact pre-’67 borders. He said that there would be land swaps to accommodate “the facts on the ground.” Meaning that border areas like Maale Adumim would be annexed by Israel in exchange for unoccupied territories from Israel proper. I happen to believe that this is going to be the scenario in any peace treaty in the unlikely event that it should ever happen. I saw nothing wrong with that statement. He was merely stating the obvious.

Aside from some pro Israel rhetoric – I do not see Romney doing anything substantially different with respect to Israel or Iran than the President has.

So as it stands now – and for the first time in many years, Israel will not be the issue that will make the decision for me in the next election. I will instead be voting for who I think will do a better job for the economy.

Right now, after Obama’s three and a half years in office – the economy is not doing  well. Far too many people are unemployed. Jobs are being created at a snail’s pace and the rate of jobs being created has actually been decreasing over the last two fiscal quarters.

Businesses aren’t hiring. They are being over taxed and over regulated which increases operational costs and tends to discourage production, and thereby hiring. His environmental policies have cost jobs too. In at least one case it has caused cancellation of a project (an oil pipeline from Canada) in the private sector that would have created jobs and helped stabilize oil prices.

Insecurity about the economy and jobs has caused something called “the paradox of thrift”. People are saving money for “a rainy day” rather than spending it. Demand for goods and services are therefore down which decreases production and jobs. Hence a stagnating economy.

All of the President’s stimulus plans have not worked. Spending money on government projects for purposes of jobs has not helped much. Except to increase the deficit. Which devalues our currency in the world and can only contribute to inflation. Oil prices are up…. causing transportation prices to go up … causing food prices to go up. One can call this stagflation!

Does that mean I support Romney? Not necessarily. Romney is something of an enigma to me. I have no clue what he would do to fix the economy. Generalizations like his successful experience in the private sector or that he will be more pro-business are meaningless without details. I do not see any specifics to indicate how he will get the economy moving again. Right now it’s all talk.

The bottom line for me is that I have no endorsement yet. I am not happy with either candidate at the moment.  With Israel being off the table in this election for the reasons I stated above – unless I can be convinced that Romney’s plan for improving the economy  makes more sense than Obama’s policies – I remain undecided.

About the Author: Harry Maryles runs the blog "Emes Ve-Emunah" which focuses on current events and issues that effect the Jewish world in general and Orthodoxy in particular. It discuses Hashkafa and news events of the day - from a Centrist perspctive and a philosphy of Torah U'Mada. He can be reached at hmaryles@yahoo.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

2 Responses to “An Analysis of the Presidential Candidates”

  1. Give me a break. This man does not know what he is talking about. He should take a look at Wes Prudens commentary in the Washington Times. Obama cannot be trusted to tell the truth.. G-d forbid, Obama in term 2 when no votes to worry about would be very dangerous to Israel.
    and the Jews based on his conduct in term one.

  2. Dale Vandagriff says:

    What are you smoking? Obama would rather have Israel wiped off the map. The only reason he is doing anything in Israel's favor is to garner the Jewish vote. If you voted for him so you would not look racist, then vote him out so you won't look stupid.

Comments are closed.

Binyamin and Chaya Maryles, uncle and aunt of Emes Ve-Emunah author Harry Maryles.
Current Top Story
ISIS affiliates murdering Christian Africans in Libya
African Christians Slaughtered by ISIS-Affiliates
Latest Blogs Stories

An Israeli TV show about Holocaust Day asserted the Holocaust is/was a European not Jewish tragedy

Former Secretary of State and First Lady Hillary Clinton. (archive)

“I am 100% convinced that she is not in any way anti-Semitic. She is in fact a philo-Semite”

Doug Goldstein

Poverty has become a thriving business; Learn how the payday loan has affected many US households

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Ruby Rivlin

Pressure by Pres. Rivlin for a monstrous “national unity government” has made things worse for Bibi

How do money managers take care of your money? And have you ever heard of “socially responsible” investing?

In the memory of loved ones, I commit to continue the fight for our survival in their blessed memory

The US Consulate in Israel should have people helping US citizens on various tax & benefits issues

This whole Arab Palestinian myth was concocted to prevent a viable Jewish state.

Teaching integrity is allowing family, friends, and associates see the business of living your life.

Chumros-YES! But when it comes to the Chilul HaShem described in the article they couldn’t care less

Yarmouk is the opportunity for “Pro-Palestinian” groups to prove they aren’t just anti-Israel.

Why are employers reluctant to hire Charedim? Legitimate concerns or plain old fashioned prejudice?

Obama’s policies are endangering world peace. This isn’t just an “Israel problem.”

What are common market risks and how do they affect your investments?

Regavim is an NGO whose mandate is to preserve the land of Israel for the State & the Jewish people

The “elephant in the room” is concern a deadlock pressures Bibi to forge a National Unity Government

More Articles from Harry Maryles
Former Secretary of State and First Lady Hillary Clinton. (archive)

“I am 100% convinced that she is not in any way anti-Semitic. She is in fact a philo-Semite”

litter

Chumros-YES! But when it comes to the Chilul HaShem described in the article they couldn’t care less

Why are employers reluctant to hire Charedim? Legitimate concerns or plain old fashioned prejudice?

Just like the shoppers on Black Friday those attending Rav Wosner’s funeral were oblivious to others

Iran not only hates the ‘Little Satan’, Israel, they hate the US- “The Great Satan too.

Daas Torah has been extrapolated to include ‘asking a Gadol’ about every decision one makes in life

Studies have shown that there are more people leaving Orthodoxy than are coming in.

Obama wants a deal at any price, ending sanctions that brought Iran to the table in the first place

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/blogs/haemtza/an-analysis-of-the-presidential-candidates/2012/07/31/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: