Originally published at Sultan Knish.
WWI was caused less by the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, and more by Germany and Austria Hungary’s eagerness in courting the Muslim Ottoman Empire.
Before and during WW2, England and Germany both assiduously courted Muslim support in the Middle East. The Holocaust was one of the byproducts of this rivalry, as Germany courted Muslims by appealing to the genocidal impulses of the Mufti of Jerusalem, while England reneged on its agreements, and shut the door to Jewish refugees trying to reach Israel. The Holocaust would have happened regardless, but the death toll would have been lower without Islamic appeasement.
After the war nothing changed except the names of the players. The competition still went on with America and Russia taking England and Germany’s seats at the table. Both sides cultivated patron Muslim countries, spent and lost huge sums of money on them, and then got a knife in the back for it, time and time again.
America made the fanatical House of Saud into its oldest partner in the region. In return the Saudi royal family nationalized American oil companies (for which the US government compensated the companies with taxpayer dollars) and then used that money to fund a global Jihad. 9/11 was only the topper on a poisonous cake that had been baking in the febrile heat of the Saudi desert for a long time, as petrodollars fed fanatical Islamic beliefs that had been growing steadily more arrogant and insane in direct proportion to the amount of wealth flowing in.
The USSR tried to export Communism, but had to settle for backing Egyptian dictator Nasser, despite his casual slaughter of domestic Communists. The heap of corruption in Cairo was considered such a great prize that both the US and the USSR competed feverishly for it.
America betrayed England and France in 1956 by backing Nasser’s seizure of the Suez Canal and forcing their withdrawal through economic blackmail; something that Eisenhower later admitted he deeply regretted. Nevertheless Nasser threw in with the USSR, which was willing to pile on the weapons exports.
After Egypt lost several wars with those same weapons, the United States finally won the bidding war for one slightly used alliance at a cost of only a few billion dollars a year and a blind eye turned to the persecution of Christian Copts. It’s still going on now. The same old courtship that has become the mid-life crisis of the West.
A flattering speech here and there. Loose immigration policies. Turning a blind eye to Saudi Arabia and Qatar’s role in terrorism in exchange for more oil deals. The French government shaking its fist at a few rogue imams and then quieting down, hoping that the 5 million Muslims get the message, and keep the car burnings down on weekends. And then France begins promoting a Mediterranean alliance, just as Russia is promoting a Bosporus alliance– as if Muslims would allow themselves to be ruled by non-Muslims for very long.
The Muslim world has a lot of oil and a lot of people, and Western governments want the former, while keeping the latter peaceable. And so they compete for Islam’s favor with each other, with the newly resurgent Russia, which is back to its old ways of shipping weapons by the fleet, China, which is feeling its global oats and poking its head beyond its borders, and with other Western countries competing in the appeasement Olympics for a shot at lucrative oil and weapons deals, for commodities markets and sovereign wealth fund investment opportunities. And not least of all, they compete with other Muslims.
Before WW2 and during the Cold War, European nations competed with each other to win the favor of Muslim rulers, but today the remnants of the civilized world are competing for Muslims, against other Muslims. The big threat today is no longer Western, it’s Islamic and while the old competitions were about forming alliances with backward Muslim countries against our enemy of the day; today the enemy of the day is Muslim. That phantom menace we call “Islamic Extremism” if we’re feeling politically correct, and “Islam” if we’re not.
About the Author: Daniel Greenfield is an Israeli born blogger and columnist, and a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. His work covers American, European and Israeli politics as well as the War on Terror. His writing can be found at http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not represent the views of The Jewish Press.
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.
If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.
- 10:03am Cease Fire Broken, Collect Your Bets
on August 1, 2014 10:04 AM
- May Israel Blow Up Terror Tunnels During the Cease Fire?
on August 1, 2014 9:46 AM
- Israel Has Been Rocket Free For…
on August 1, 2014 9:14 AM
- Hamas Calls for Day of Rage [video]
on August 1, 2014 8:28 AM
- 5 Soldiers Killed Overnight
on August 1, 2014 7:51 AM
- Overnight/Morning Slew of Rockets as Cease Fire Approaches
on August 1, 2014 7:50 AM
- Arab Journalist ‘Lobbyist’ at State Department Press Briefings
on August 1, 2014 7:50 AM
- Belgian Doctor to Jewish Woman: Go to Gaza, I Won’t Treat You
on August 1, 2014 6:31 AM
- 72 Hour Cease Fire Declared for 8:00AM
on August 1, 2014 1:27 AM
- Ban & Kerry Want New Cease Fire Amidst Ceaseless Rocket Fire From Gaza
on August 1, 2014 12:52 AM
- Israel Antiquities Authority Director, Shuka Dorfman, 64, z’l
on July 31, 2014 11:46 PM
- Amos Gilad: Completion of Tunnel Neutralization Delayed as More Tunnels Found
on July 31, 2014 11:45 PM
- Combat Soldiers Forbidden to Fast on Tisha B’Av
on July 31, 2014 9:44 PM
- 8 Injured in Gaza Mortar Attack
on July 31, 2014 9:07 PM
- One Injured in Kiryat Gat Attack, Fragments Hit Tel Aviv
on July 31, 2014 7:27 PM
- Yes, it was a direct order from Obama and Kerry's to hurt Israel into submission. (46%, 962 Votes)
- Yes, Obama and Kerry gave the FAA a "hint" to to hurt Israel into submission. (18%, 376 Votes)
- Yes, it was simply understood from the administration's anti-Israel atmosphere. (9%, 199 Votes)
- No, it was a professional decision for the safety of US citizens. (18%, 378 Votes)
- No, it was simply an unprofessional decision by unthinking bureaucrats. (9%, 182 Votes)
Do you think the FAA ban on US flights to Israel is political?
Total Voters: 2,097