web analytics
September 3, 2015 / 19 Elul, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Arguing against ‘Limited’ Strikes on the Assad Regime

Surviving the strikes will permit Assad to boast that he defeated the United States.
Bashar al-Assad's notorious incompetence means his response cannot be anticipated.

Bashar al-Assad's notorious incompetence means his response cannot be anticipated.

Originally published at Daniel Pipes.

Warfare is a very serious business whose first imperative is to deploy force to win – rather than to punish, make a statement, establish a symbolic point, or preen about one’s morality.

Yet, these latter are precisely what several Western states will accomplish if they respond to the Syrian government’s apparent use of chemical weapons against civilians with “limited” strikes lasting one or two days against fewer than fifty sites. Briefly lobbing American, British, and other missiles against the regime without a concomitant readiness to deploy ground troops will neither overthrow the government nor change the course of the war. It will, however, allow Westerners to feel good about themselves.

It will also entail real dangers. Bashar al-Assad’s notorious incompetence means his response cannot be anticipated. Western strikes could, among other possibilities, inadvertently lead to increased regime attacks on civilians, violence against Israel, an activation of sleeper cells in Western countries, or heightened dependence on Tehran. Surviving the strikes also permits Assad to boast that he defeated the United States.

In other words, the imminent attack entails few potential benefits but many potential drawbacks. As such, it neatly encapsulates the Obama administration’s failed foreign policy.

About the Author: Daniel Pipes is a world-renowned Middle East and Islam expert. He is President of the Middle East Forum. His articles appear in many newspapers. He received his A.B. (1971) and Ph.D. (1978) from Harvard University and has taught at Harvard, Pepperdine, the U.S. Naval War College, and the University of Chicago. He is a board member of the U.S. Institute of Peace and other institutions. His website is DanielPipes.org.

The author's opinion does not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Jewish Press.

If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

3 Responses to “Arguing against ‘Limited’ Strikes on the Assad Regime”

  1. Yechiel Baum says:

    With Assad's family living in England, will his father-in-law give him his house keys in London since Assad never sold his mansion?

  2. Obama, Cameron stay out from Syria, let them kill each other.

  3. Obama, Cameron stay out from Syria, let them kill each other.

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Israeli President Reuven Rivlin meets with Pope Francis during his visit to the Vatican in Rome, Italy.
Pres. Rivlin Meets in State Visit with Pope Francis at Vatican

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/blogs/the-lions-den-daniel-pipes/arguing-against-limited-strikes-on-the-assad-regime/2013/08/28/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: