Fundamental and far-reaching changes are coming that will have a profound effect on every individual in New York State who receives services under the current system for caring for individuals with developmental disabilities. The changes, being touted as “Medicaid Waiver Reform,” are motivated primarily by the drive to cut the growth in the amount of money the state and federal government are spending on this care. Despite official denials, they will inevitably reduce the choice of care, quality of care and recourse to corrective measures available to the individuals receiving the care and their families. The plan is being developed and implemented with federal government approval largely behind closed doors. Its documents use dense language designed to camouflage its ultimate impact upon individuals with special needs.
Under the deceptively named OPWDD 1115 People First Waiver, the Cuomo administration seeks to outsource the state’s responsibility for delivering services to individuals who qualify for Medicaid Waiver to non-governmental superagencies known as DISCOs (Developmental Disabilities Individual Support and Care Coordination Organizations), while capping their dollar cost to the government. The new system will resemble managed care HMO plans in the health care system, whose subscribers are required to receive all of their health care services within the HMOs network of providers. The HMO provides these services for a single fixed premium payment (minus deductibles and co-payments), and assumes the financial responsibility for paying the cost of the services that are actually delivered to plan subscribers as negotiated in its contracts with its providers.
The fear is that under the new 1115 Waiver system, individuals with developmental disabilities will be subject to the kind of substandard care and bureaucratic red tape for which some managed care plans have become notorious. Another fear is that the quality of care provided through the DISCOs will be limited by the same financial incentives that HMOs have to hold down their costs by limiting the amount and quality of care they provide to the minimum they can get away with.
The therapists and community organizations now actually providing the care will come under increased economic pressure either to leave the field or to cut back on the quality of their service in order to reduce their own costs. Over time, many will have no choice but to give up their independence and be merged into larger organizations or the DISCOs seeking economies of scale, much like what is happening in a lot of the US health care industry.
The Willowbrook Horrors
The concerns of the special needs community in New York State are driven by fears that these changes could undue much of the progress that has been made since the revelation of the deplorable conditions at the Willowbrook State School in Staten Island in the 1960′s and early 1970′s. Among social workers, Willowbrook was known as a warehouse for New York City’s mentally disabled children whom had been abandoned there by their families as well as the foster care agencies assigned to care for them.
In the early 1960′s, Willowbrook was the site of a notorious medical experiment, in which healthy children living there were deliberately infected with the Hepatitis A virus so that members of the medical staff could monitor the effectiveness of treating the disease with gamma globulin (blood plasma proteins, including certain antibodies).
When US Senator Robert Kennedy visited Willowbrook in 1965, he called it a “snakepit,” whose residents were “living in filth and dirt, their clothing in rags, in rooms less comfortable and cheerful than the cages in which we put animals in a zoo.” Seven years later, a TV expose by reporter Geraldo Rivera graphically revealed the severely overcrowded conditions there, and that the residents were suffering physical abuse by members of the school’s staff.
The public uproar that followed forced NY State to embark on a program of de-institutionalization. It gradually phased out large state-run facilities like Willowbrook and transferred their populations to small, community-based institutions and programs. This led to the current system for New York’s MRDD (mentally retarded and developmentally delayed) population. A class-action suit filed against NY State in federal court was settled with a 1987 agreement by the state to meet special guidelines for the community placement and lifetime care of the surviving members of the “Willowbrook class.”
A Turning Point for the Treatment of Developmental Disabilities
The Willowbrook scandal marked a historic turning point in this nation’s treatment of the developmentally disabled. It mobilized Special Needs advocates to demand more effective and humane care in a community setting close to their homes and families.
This led to the passage of a series of federal laws. The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibited discrimination on the basis of disabilities. The Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 was renamed and expanded in 1990 and is now known as the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). It requires the state to provide children who have a broad range of disabilities with a “Free and Appropriate Education” (FAPE) in accordance with their Individualized Education Plan (IEP). These laws are the basis for the government-funded service system in place today involving the participation of 750 different community-based organizations in New York alone, working under state and federal government supervision.
Now all those gains are in jeopardy, due to the enormous pressure being exerted by the federal government on the New York State government to reduce spending on services to the MRDD population. In response, the state is proposing to restructure the way that all current services are delivered to individuals who qualify for Medicaid Waiver, including basic health care services that are identified in their IEPs. The plan is euphemistically named the “1115 People First Waiver” and the cost of its development and implementation is being funded by the federal government.
The plan calls for many of the current functions of the New York State Office for People With Developmental Disabilities (OPWDD), which was formerly known as OMRDD, to be outsourced to the DISCOs, which are not under direct government control.
Services from the Lowest Bidder
The DISCOs are supposed to offer Medicaid Waiver qualified individuals the full range of services to which they are legally entitled, oversee the quality of those services, and pay the actual costs of providing them. In return, the DISCOs would receive a capitation (flat rate) per person payment provided by the government. This is very different from the current fee-for-service model, under which community service providers receive payments from the government that are directly related to the historic operating costs of their specific facilities and programs. The more costly the program has been to operate, the higher the reimbursement rate they received.
By contrast, the DISCOs will be paid a flat per-person rate established by the Cuomo administration for a standard spectrum of services for individuals with the same category of diagnosis. The DISCOs will subcontract the actual delivery of the services to community providers, with whom they will negotiate the reimbursement the provider will actually receive. Current community service providers will have to compete with one another for DISCO subcontracts.
Since the DISCOs pocket any difference between the flat rate the state pays them and what they pay the providers, the DISCOs will choose service providers largely on the basis of lowest cost, and in some cases, will be providing the services themselves. Over time, the higher cost providers will be eliminated, even if they provide higher quality services, and the quality of care will inevitably suffer.
Care recipients are supposed to be offered a choice of DISCOs, but given the powerful incentives for each DISCO to cut costs built into the new system, it is doubtful that the choices will be meaningful. Furthermore, since the DISCOs are expected to monitor themselves, the ability of care recipients and their family members to file effective complaints will be significantly reduced.
The State’s Real Priorities
The preliminary 1115 Waiver plans published by New York State talks about provisions to deal with these problems, but government officials have made it clear to community providers that the state’s top priority is to cut the cost of services, while paying only lip service to the issues of maintaining service quality and meaningful patient choice.
The state’s main goal is clearly laid out in the report of the fiscal team designing the 1115 Waiver (see reference 1): “In recent years, Medicaid expenditures for individuals with developmental disabilities have grown at twice the rate of inflation and three times faster than personal income. . .
“The 2.8 percent annual growth in [the number of] individuals seeking services is due to factors largely outside the control of State government and is likely to continue indefinitely.”
The aim of the Waiver initiative, therefore is, “to meet individuals’ needs, but at lower cost. . . [by implementing] a capitation payment model to achieve these goals.”
State officials have said that the current system of 750 groups providing services is financially unsustainable, and admit that they hope to eliminate the higher cost providers with the new 1115 Waiver system.
The state began implementing planning and evaluation for the new system in November, and expects to launch pilot programs under the system and test DISCO operations in the latter part of 2012 (for the full 1115 Waiver timetable, see reference 2).
Unfortunately, what we know about the 1115 Waiver plans so far serves as a warning that many of the hard earned gains that have been achieved for the MRDD population since Willowbrook are now in jeopardy. Time is running out. The citizens of New York State must be alerted about how the 1115 Waiver changes will hurt all individuals with special needs. We must join together to protest and speak out against them, before it is too late.
Reference 1: http://www.opwdd.ny.gov/2011_waiver/images/fiscal_final_report.pdf Reference 2: http://www.skipofny.org/upload/OPWDD_1115_Waiver_Background.pdf Reference 3: The New York State branch of The Arc, a disability activist group, has provided a web page with layman’s definitions of the terms used by New York State in discussing the 1115 waiver - http://blog.nysarc.org/2011/08/10/understanding-the-1115-waiver-terminology-guide/ Reference 4: New York State has created a “People First Waiver” web page invites the participation of the public in the process of its development. It also accepts e-mail addresses for notification of further waiver developments: http://www.opwdd.ny.gov/2011_waiver/
The People First Waiver web page also lists an e-mail and telephone public comment line: E-mail to: People.First@OPWDD.ny.gov. The phone comment line is: 1-866-946-9733 or (TTY): 1-866-933-4889.
About the Author:
You might also be interested in: