web analytics
September 4, 2015 / 20 Elul, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Apartheid: The Big Lie

Demonstrators against Israel

Photo Credit: Olivier Fitoussi /Flash90

In the absence of a peace settlement between the parties that will determine the boundaries of territories currently dispute, both the Palestinian Authority and Israel control parts of the West Bank. Measures such as roadblocks, checkpoints and a fence have been imposed not for the purposes of segregation, but for security and for self-defense. Although it is true that these security measures cause inconveniences and some hardship, they have been created to prevent terrorist attacks, not to impose discrimination by an oppressive regime. It is a tribute to the nature of democracy in Israel that its Supreme Court on a number of occasions has ordered the state to make changes in the fence route, often by a small amount, when the fence seemed to be imposing hardship on the Palestinians.

The world is all too well aware of the disputes between Israel and Palestinians, especially on the complex issues of settlements, refugees, and Jerusalem, but to accuse Israel of being “apartheid” is not only false, it is unhelpful and counterproductive for any hope for a peaceful settlement.

The unjustifiable, misguided, and extensively expressed “moral outrage” over the Big Lie directed against Israel can partly be explained by ignorance of the reality of political and social conditions in Israel and in the territories. For all the problems encountered by a state created by Jews, and with 21 Arab and Muslim neighbors openly threatening to destroy it — sometimes, as with Iran, to the illegal point of publicly advocating genocide — it is a remarkable success story — unlike the failures of every surrounding Arab and Muslim state except those benefitting from enormous oil resources.

One must conclude that the enemies of Israel, or inflexibly biased critics, are maliciously demonizing it with repetition of the word “apartheid” in the hope of goading the international community into denying Israel’s legitimacy as a state, in an effort to destroy it. Regrettably, one must also conclude that the perceptions of Israel have been colored for many people, now including Muslims, by an antisemitism which has become increasingly conspicuous both by rhetoric and physical assaults on Jews and Jewish institutions.

Critics of Israel may understandingly claim the mantle of compassion and express empathy for the Palestinians, whom they consider the weaker party in the enduring conflict with Israel. They may argue the case against what they consider oppressive behavior by Israeli authorities, and point to instances of injustice. Yet at the same time they ignore not only the repressive and corrupt governance of the Palestinian Authority to its own citizens, but also the principles of liberty and equality inherent in the state of Israel, and above all the need for all nations to take appropriate measures to defend themselves against those in hostile environments who are eager to destroy them.

Those individuals, groups, and organizations making use of the word “apartheid” are appealing to the emotions of those who rightfully find the concept deplorable, but by doing so they are polarizing political positions and unjustly oversimplifying a complex situation, in which one side, Israel’s, has so often offered reasonable compromises for peace, and the other side, the Palestinians, backed by many of the 21 Arab and Muslim countries has refused to enter into any real meaningful negotiations.

Originally published by http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org

 

About the Author: Michael Curtis is Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Rutgers University, and author of the forthcoming book, Should Israel Exist? A sovereign nation under assault by the international community.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

One Response to “Apartheid: The Big Lie”

  1. Desmond Tuto has said that in many ways Israel is worse then South Africa was. Uri Davis correctly points out that Israel does not have what he calls "petty apartheid" like separate drinking fountains. Israel is an apartheid state because 90% of its land is controlled by the JNF or under JNF rules which prohibit the sale or long term lease of land to any non-Jew. In addition Jews have preferential rights to citizenship denied to all non-Jews while the level of government services such as schools and development funds to non-Jews is at a much lower level than the same services to Jews, In 1989 the JNF withdrew an application fir tax exempt status in Nassau County New York when confronted with evidence of the apartheid nature of its organization and practices.

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Psalms in the Old City of Jerusalem,, Clinton-Abbas, and Hamas flags in the Old City.
A Tale of Two Prayers: Muslims and Clinton vs. Jews and Psalms [video]

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/analysis/apartheid-the-big-lie/2012/05/21/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: