Khaled Abu Toameh: Should Jordan Be a Palestinian State?
Latest update: November 30th, 2012
print
tell a friend
PM Netanyahu and Jordanian King Abdullah II
Photo Credit: Avi Ohayon/GPO/Flash90
Those who support the idea of turning Jordan into a Palestinian state need to be think carefully about the consequences of such a move. A Palestinian state in Jordan would only be a source of even further instability and tension in the Middle East.
The royal family in Jordan has always been friendly to Israel and the West. Like his father, the late King Hussein, King Abdullah II is probably Israel’s best friend and ally in the Arab and Islamic world.
The long border between Israel and Jordan has been relatively quite over the past few decades — thanks to the Jordanian authorities’ tremendous efforts to prevent terror attacks from their territories.
Turning Jordan into Palestine would mean the loss of a moderate and rational Arab leader at a time when Islamists are rising to power in Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco and Libya.
It would mean the creation of a third state for the Palestinians, who already have two entities – one in the West Bank and another in the Gaza Strip.
A Palestinian state in Jordan would be run by either Hamas or Fatah — the two parties that have failed their people again and again in the past few decades. In any event, whoever replaces the royal family in Jordan would not be as moderate, pragmatic, and open-minded as the Hashemites.
The Jordanian monarch has displayed courage by resisting pressure from wealthy Arab countries like Qatar to allow Hamas – after it was thrown out of Syria – to establish its headquarters in Amman.
King Abdullah II, who since the beginning of the “Arab Spring” has been forced to tackle growing unrest in his kingdom, should also be commended for resisting immense pressure from Muslim Brotherhood and many Jordanians and Palestinians to cut off diplomatic ties with Israel.
Security cooperation between Israel and Jordan has always been strong: the two countries face the same challenges, threats, and enemies.
King Abdullah II and his father have prevented Hamas from establishing terror bases in the kingdom.
In 1999, King Hussein did not hesitate to expel Hamas leaders after closing down their offices in Amman.
A few years later, the Jordanians thwarted plans by Hamas to smuggle weapons into the kingdom for the purpose of launching terror attacks against Israel.
The king already has too many problems at home. The talk about “Jordan is Palestine” and “Palestine is Jordan” only aggravates these problems and plays into the hands of those who would turn the kingdom into a radical state that would probably be afflicted with Iran or the Muslim Brotherhood.
Originally published by Stonegate Institute www.stonegateinstitute.org
tell a friendAbout the Author: Khaled Abu Toameh, an Arab Muslim, is a veteran award-winning journalist who has been covering Palestinian affairs for nearly three decades.
You might also be interested in:
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
One Response to “Khaled Abu Toameh: Should Jordan Be a Palestinian State?”
1
Loading ...
A blind observer could easily see that for Israel the situation is harder every day. Israel is surrounded, from Morocco till Iran and more, by fanatic and low minded enemys that are trying to erase it from the face of the earth. Obama is another muslim that will not help Israel unless you grasp him down there, you know what I mean…So, if Israel is prepared to do it by itself, do it. Later on it will be too late. Anyway, if you do it or not, Israel will always be considered guilty and responsible. Come on, Bibi, dont allow another Holocaust.
Ayax Perrella