Netanyahu should formulate an interim solution to the "West Bank."
It’s over; it didn’t work; democracy failed.
As happy as I am to see the EPA and other agencies off the job, I’m concerned about morale among the hard-working law enforcement and essential-services folks.
She wrote two articles, one calling the Syrian rebels radicals, another saying they're moderates.
Was Cruz’s Stand an “Alamo” moment?
Georgetown was getting Arab money for teaching about the Middle East, but none of it could be used to teach about Israel.
Al-Jazeera again appears to be promoting Islamic violence these days, in Egypt and in Israel.
He gets that we can’t just sit still, paralyzed by bad press and Democratic talking points.
From the 1990s onward, Iran has gone further than any Arab country in hosting and officially endorsing Western Holocaust deniers.
The NY Times is lying. Netanyahu cannot "block" an initiative and if Obama wants talks he will have them.
Today's anti-democratic glue is apparently better than the glue of Slavic identity that formed the "Warsaw Pact" because it is a world view and a cultural perspective.
Countries must be ready for a higher level of potential friction with the Obama Administration.
The report warned that U.S. efforts to arm Sunni rebels could help Al Qaida militias in Syria.
One of the factors in British policy was a hope that if the Germans were flattered and treated properly, they would not be aggressive.
If chemical weapons had not been used, Damascus would have been overcome by the rebels.
The seeming end of a deal would only be the beginning of a deal.
Obama’s supporters in the media (and no doubt in Hollywood, politics, and the academy) see a light at the end of this tunnel...
These firms worked on contractual arrangements with clearance and confidentiality agreements signed with the US Department of Defense.
The bottom line is the belief that if the Muslim Brotherhood is kept happy it won’t cause any trouble.
The greatest danger for Israel would be to listen to the bad advice of Obama, Kerry, and their supporters.
We're asking U.S. troops to go into Syria without an overwhelming advantage, and without minimizing our risks.
These threats should be laughed at.
We don’t know what their thinking is on the choice between evils: the evil of intervening or the evil of failing to after defining a red line.
The Obama Administration believes that it can reconcile with Islamist states.
Why have those who govern Syria followed such a pattern for more than six decades under almost a dozen different regimes?