web analytics
August 22, 2014 / 26 Av, 5774
Israel at War: Operation Protective Edge
 
 
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat (L) visits the JewishPress.com booth at The Event. And the Winners of the JewishPress.com Raffle Are…

Congratulations to all the winners of the JewishPress.com raffle at The Event



America’s Impending Defeat in Syria

The Obama Administration believes that it can reconcile with Islamist states.
U.S. infantry paratroopers practicing high altitude, low opening jumping. The Administration is about to rush into a war where winning is not the best outcome.

U.S. infantry paratroopers practicing high altitude, low opening jumping. The Administration is about to rush into a war where winning is not the best outcome.
Photo Credit: Master Sergeant Bill Thompson

Originally published at Rubin Reports.

It’s really pretty simple. The American people understandably don’t want to go to war with Syria, not to mention Syria’s patron of Iran and especially not to put into power the Muslim Brotherhood and murderous Islamists. Going to war is a serious matter to say the least. There’s no assurance how long it will take, how many lives it will cost, and what turns it may take.

In fact the Middle East has just had several examples of these wars. Iraq and Afghanistan cost a lot of money and lives as they extended for a much longer time than had been expected. In addition they derailed the Bush Administration’s electoral fortunes and domestic programs. With the main emphasis of the Obama Administration being a fundamental transformation of America such distractions are not desired.

There is one other important consideration. The Obama Administration does not accept the traditional diplomatic and great power strategies. It believes that it can reconcile with Islamist states; it does not comprehend deterrents; it does not keep faith with allies; and it does not believe in credibility, which is the belief that only power exerted can convince a foe of seriousness.

Of course, that wouldn’t rule out a one -time targeted attack but even if that were to be done is America going to fight a full-scale war on the ground with the American allies (including al-Qaeda) never satisfied and eager to stab them in the back?

The administration has trapped itself with two problems. One is that the rebels who are being supported in Syria are extreme radicals who may set off blood baths and regional instability if they win. The other is that a challenge has been given to very reckless forces: Iran, Syria, and Hezbollah. When the United States threatens these three players the response is “make my day!”

So this is the situation. The United States is bluffing, it does not want to exert force and probably won’t. In other words, Iran and Syria would be quite willing to fight a war but the United States and its government doesn’t have the will to do so.

What is the optimum option for the Obama Administration ? To try to negotiate – as unlikely as it is – a deal in which some kind of interim or coalition arrangement would be arranged with Russia and Iran to make a transition from the current regime. And that mainly means stalling for time.

That could work, though, if the regime does not actually win in the war. Aid to rebels and some gimmicks, perhaps but no decisive action. Remember. though, that Iran cannot be said to have won as long as the civil war is continuing. The Administration can simply depend on denial, which should be sufficient for domestic purposes.

There is, however. a problem. The two sides Syrian sides want to wipe each other out. Why should the Russians and Iranians make a deal if they have a winning hand? No diplomatic arrangement is possible. In fact the diplomatic option is fictional or, to put it flatly, there is no alternative.

It is not inconceivable that the White House would consider easing sanctions on the Iranian nuclear program to have a chance on making a deal on Syria.

What is likely then is stalling, with the probability that the civil war will settle into stagnation for several years and thus a de facto partition of Syria. The United States simply can’t win given what it is willing to do. And in a great power standoff that’s a very dangerous situation.

Remember. though, that Iran cannot be said to have won as long as the civil war is continuing. The Administration can simply depend on denial, which should be sufficient for domestic purposes.

Finally, ask yourself one question: Will the United States under Obama dare a confrontation with Iran, Syria, and Russia to keep up American credibility, deterrence, and confidence of allies who it is already opposing on Egypt?

Of course not. This is already a president who could barely decide to kill Osama bin Laden.

About the Author: Professor Barry Rubin is director of the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center and editor of the Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal. See the GLORIA/MERIA site at www.gloria-center.org.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

21 Responses to “America’s Impending Defeat in Syria”

  1. Jim420 says:

    Hit ‘em USA! Start with Assad’s palace HQ houses.   Go Navy!!!!!!!!

  2. US policy should be to provide limited aid to whicher side begins to lose and to keep the parties fighting until both sides tire of the bloodletting. Stalemate should be the objective.

  3. William Kohn says:

    "The Obama Administration does not accept the traditional diplomatic and great power strategies. It believes that it can reconcile with Islamist states; it does not comprehend deterrents; it does not keep faith with allies; and it does not believe in credibility, which is the belief that only power exerted can convince a foe of seriousness."
    Very nicely done. In these two sentences you have captured the milquetoast who occupies the Oval Office and renders our country the laughing stock of the developed world. All the talking heads on CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN and MSNBC should take note. All their long winded excuses amount to nothing but a fig leaf for a President who is clearly unable or unwilling to exert American power and strength. The Emperor truly has no clothes.

  4. with the time Obama has left in the white house and his wonderful set of advisors…there is no telling to the great amount of grave mistakes it could make, not only in the middle east, but elsewhere. please Obama, leave Syria and Egypt to fend for themselves. the more of them that die…the better for Israel…your only true ally in the world! Sunni and Shiite have been killing each other for centuries…what difference does it really make a few more years?
    and please do not blame me…I voted for the other guy…

  5. The problem Obama is a islamist and regrettably will get involved to a new war, all this Obama and his leckayers don't look the past 70 years, the US didn't win a war: Korea, Vietnam, Lebanon, Afgahnistan and Irak, also has lost Iran, only the Gulf war won, the balance polytically, wars a total failure, looking this the best sugestion is that the US should get out from there, in porpouse if Obama get involved should return the Peace Nobel Price, what I doubt becouse he is a corrupt.

  6. MayjuneJewLie says:

    Problem is the US is controlled by Zionist jews and all wars in the middle east are the result of zionist jews. The US needs to rid themselves of their rat problem.

  7. MayjuneJewLie says:

    Fact is everyone in the US I’ve talked to don’t think we should be doing anything in the middle east for Israel. They got their illegal land, let them defend it themselves. Benjamin Franklin spoke off the jews also and he was a founding father.

  8. The Guardian says:

    Hey MayJune, you Islamic sucking Nazi scum, bend over so your Daddy can give it to you the way you like it.

  9. MayjuneJewLie says:

    you mean the way rabbis like to give it to babies when they circumcise them

  10. I will say Obama is a "islamisT", but he doesn't understand what is a islamist, I always new that the muslims they had and have many wifes becouse the wars, but today they didn't have so many wars, but males was equal in quantity with females, so now I understand why the male muslims are warriors and get killed each other untill the equation are more females than males equal more wifes for one man and have much more childrens males and females with the preference the males to make warriors and again killing each other, this serial goes till now after Mohamed times, that is why the muslims in Midle East are a mess, so I understand, and I don't now if the "islamist" Obama and his leckayers understand.

  11. Yechiel Baum says:

    As the US provide Syria with misslies, weapons, and financial aid in the past and having lost in Afgan Iraq, little yemen, do you think USA will defeat Syria? The Arabs, and Russians and Iran is laughing at the USA.

  12. Ruth Hirt says:

    Prof Barry has the knack of pinning precise points in the issues of his topics. Love reading his articles. In this regard, we are best informed, with much teeth-gritting what keeps the US president dilly-dallying, I find it annoying and how frustrating it must be to those whose responsibilities are closely tied to defense, diplomacy and national security.

  13. Ruth Hirt says:

    Prof Barry has the knack of pinning precise points in the issues of his topics. Love reading his articles. In this regard, we are best informed, with much teeth-gritting what keeps the US president dilly-dallying, I find it annoying and how frustrating it must be to those whose responsibilities are closely tied to defense, diplomacy and national security.

  14. CTBtweets says:

    Eat **** And Die Mayjune.

  15. MayjuneJewLie says:

    No need for butt hurt, history speaks for itself. Real history, Not that propaganda b.s. that runs rampant In mainstream media. TRUTH

  16. Isaiah53 says:

    No, No, No. Obama goes to Congress who says no way. Obama, banking on 2014 midterms says, “darn those wascally republicans” The will of the people and all… face saved.

  17. Isaiah53 says:

    Forgot to add the MSM jump into the pool of kool-aide, case closed.

  18. Isaiah53 says:

    MayjuneJewLie I really hope you aren’t a female. A ‘%#*^’ with a mouth like that is an embarrassment to  “Ladies” everywhere.

  19. Isaiah53 says:

    The Guardian AAANND the hate you spew is no better. Feel like a real man, do you?

  20. Isaiah53 says:

    CTBtweets See comment to Guardian above. Come on people. Clean up the filth. All of us don’t speak like the proverbial ‘drunken sailor’. No offense to the Navy intended.

  21. MayjuneJewLie says:

    Congress will agree with military action but not with the “open ended” wording of the proposed plan. Like “war on terror”….pretty vague wording there. Who’s a terrorist? How do you identify a terrorist? I guess the “logical” way is to bomb a v ountry, invade a country, kill women and children and the “terrorists” will come out of the woodwork. Those aren’t terrorists, those are everyday people that have resorted to violence to fight an illegal invasion and occupation. Furthermore, war is the jews harvest.

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
A member of Students for Justice in Palestine punched a pro-Israel student in the face at Temple University, Aug. 20, 2014. SJP claims the pro-Israel student provoked the incident.
Pro-’Palestine’ Students at Temple U Blame Victim for Altercation
Latest Indepth Stories
Charles Krauthammer

Wye would be seen to have set the groundwork for the creation of a Palestinian state

David_Grossman

Blaming Israel for the violence in Gaza, he ends up justifying Hamas’s terrorism.

488px-WielkaSynagoga3_Lodz

In the Thirties it was common for anti-Semites to call on Jews to “go to Palestine!”

Netanyahu-Obama-030212

Obama never hid his contempt for the Israeli government or the majority of Israel’s voters.

“This arbitrary ban is an ugly stain on our democracy, and it also undermines the rule of law.”

We take US “aid” for psychological reasons-if we have an allowance, that means we have a father.

ZIM Piraeus isn’t Israeli-owned or flagged, incidentally, it is Greek operated.

Foolish me, thinking the goals were the destruction of Hamas thereby giving peace a real chance.

The free-spirted lifestyle didn’t hold your interest; the needs of your people did.

And why would the U.S. align itself on these issues with Turkey and Qatar, longtime advocates of Hamas’s interests?

Several years ago the city concluded that the metzitzah b’peh procedure created unacceptable risks for newborns in terms of the transmission of neo-natal herpes through contact with a mohel carrying the herpes virus.

The world wars caused unimaginable anguish for the Jews but God also scripted a great glory for our people.

We were quite disappointed with many of the points the secretary-general offered in response.

Judging by history, every time Hamas rebuilds their infrastructure, they are stronger than before.

His father asked him to read Psalms from the Book of Tehilim every day.

More Articles from Barry Rubin
Youssef Ziedan

The interviewer responds, “There was also Balfour.”

peace_clowns

If the Obama/Kerry peace deal does go through, what would the risks be?

Let me make it plain. There will be mass murder, even genocide in Syria.

A large number of pro-Obama and radical or even anti-Israel cadre are Jews.

Does anyone think the Palestinian Authority will resist daily attacks from Hamas and Fatah radicals?

Secret Service security arrangements were overruled.

The Obama Administration plan is very simple, assuming that everything goes smoothly–which of course it will not.

The less you know about Islam, the better. Ignorance is strength.

    Latest Poll

    Do you think the FAA ban on US flights to Israel is political?






    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/analysis/rubin-reports/americas-impending-defeat-in-syria/2013/08/27/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: