web analytics
March 6, 2015 / 15 Adar , 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


The Solution: How to Deal with Obama Middle East Policy

Countries must be ready for a higher level of potential friction with the Obama Administration.
"What you give is what you get." Israelis no longer trust Obama on Israel's security while he negotiates with Iran.

"What you give is what you get." Israelis no longer trust Obama on Israel's security while he negotiates with Iran.

Originally published at Rubin Reports.

To see an alternative policy for the Middle East–presented four years ago and still timely, see:

It is likely that the efforts of the Obama Administration during its second term will fail, not only because of its lack of understanding of the region and its ideology but also due to the specific agenda.

NO MIDDLE EASTERN COUNTRY OR MOVEMENT–ONLY HOSTILE ONES–CAN DEPEND ON THE UNITED STATES.

And to clarify this further:

NO COUNTRY–INCLUDING ISRAEL–CAN DEPEND ON THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION.

But as I noted above, this U.S. policy of Obama’s second term will fail. For example, the main goals of the second term are four big issues:

–Israel-Palestinian peace

–Egypt government coalition with Muslim Brotherhood

–Syrian civil war resolution with rebel victory

–U.S.-Iran rapprochement resolving nuclear issue.

Yet because of irreconcilable differences, these may well be unresolvable. Due to such failures and hardline radical positions (Palestinians, Muslim Brotherhood, Syrian Islamists and regime, Iranian regime), the next administration would probably be forced back on recognition of extremism, support of allies, and U.S. interests.

Thus, regarding the “peace process,” we may well see the typical pattern in which the Palestinians wreck the peace process by rejecting or demanding even more concessions. Once again, it will only be necessary to wait until American negotiators learn better why their goals are impossible. Radicals will just raise their demands and demonstrate their anti-Americanism, and necessary priorities will shift.

The difference this time would be that the policymakers would not learn until the next president. Yet there are other reasons for hope, too, and these must be integrated into the strategies of would-be allies of the United States.

These include several points:

–Since U .S. policies do not take into proper account the legitimate interests of allies, a greater element of defiance will be necessary. With the Saudis, for example, they had to rescue the client regime in Bahrain, because the Obama Administration refused, step in and subsidize the coup regime in Egypt and subsidize the Lebanese opposition.

Countries must be ready for a higher level of potential friction with the Obama Administration, which will not damage future foreign policy when the time comes that the current president will be replaced by a different Democratic or Republican one.

–When required to make a tactical retreat due to lack of U.S. support, it should be stretched out, because the clock is ticking on January 2017.

–Of course the clock is ticking too on wasted time. Iran will be closer to having nuclear weapons, for instance, but that just indicates the actual harm done by the Obama Administration policies. Islamists will also be stronger than would have been true otherwise. This was, however, not true in Egypt, where there was local resistance backed by Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries.

–The creation of parallel alliances and what might be called objective alliances, which can include countries that are nominal enemies. These include building bonds with Asia, including China and India, as powers. In other words, if America will not play a leading or supportive role, others must be found to do so.

But the most important single factor is the genie offer. In this scenario, a genie appears and offers the beneficiary three wishes, but with each one, the genie gives his enemy twice that amount.

Okay, says the clever man, I want to go half bankrupt. (This would make his rival fully bankrupt.)

This is not a joke. The instability, bad economic policies, adventurous actions, and other temptations that American weakness and error lured one into are counterproductive and self-damaging. The best examples are the Muslim Brotherhood’s management of politics and the Palestinians’ overplaying of their hand to lose a real chance to get an independent state. And Syria wrecking itself with Islamists and radical nationalists killing each other.

You could call this the “Home Alone strategy,” which is going to be needed by would-be U.S. allies–at least until responsible adults show up to direct U.S. foreign policy. And that will take at least another 3 years and 4 months.

About the Author: Professor Barry Rubin is director of the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center and editor of the Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal. See the GLORIA/MERIA site at www.gloria-center.org.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

6 Responses to “The Solution: How to Deal with Obama Middle East Policy”

  1. jgray1 says:

    america will not flourish during these next few years. we’d be lucky if we survived. obama has no policies  because he’s vacant. no interior resolve informs him. he just goes with whatever is popular and since that is jew hating that’s where he goes. he is mendacious but he’s also dumber than he is evil. somehow that makes matters even worse.

  2. Ch Hoffman says:

    rubin hates obama more than he loves the us or israel

  3. Obsma hates Israel even more than he hates America, and that is saying something.

  4. Rubin is right on target, mostly, but the real 400-point gorilla in the room – there are actually two of them – are these:

    1. Obviously, the Iran nuke weapons program. This is Obama primary coercive tool in forcing Israel to capitulate on the Pali issue. He won't give it up easily. But this is an existential issue for Israel. She is going to have to act decisively before it is too late…if it isn't already too late. And this will provoke maximum friction with Obama…but Netanyahu has to 'gut it up" anyway.

    2. If Israel does not "cry uncle" on a bogus peace [surrender] deal with the PA, then Obama's "plan B" is not only to let Iran go nuclear and put maximum pressure on Israel not to do anything decisive about this, but also, he'll abandon Israel to the wolves in the UN (i.e., the Arab/Islamist Petrodollar Brothel, New York City Branch). So, Israel not only has to be prepared to hit Iran, but also to fiercely put down Intifada Three, with all the attendant consequences.

    Israel, more than anyone else, is going to have to risk "increased friction" – the understatement of the century – from the U.S. under Obama in the pursuit of her vital and legitimate interests.

    Thanks a great big heap, my fellow Jewish Americans who voted for Obama in droves both times, who gave him big bucks, etc., etc. I don't know if you all bear central responsibility for putting Obama in office – I tend to doubt that, as I see him as more the crowning achievement of the Arab/Islamist Petrodllar Pimp Empire – but IF you are, then it would not surprise me if our G-d got fed up and decided to let Israel fall. Far be it for me to interpret His will and design, but it seems to me like anything is possible now.

    I'm so used to things getting worse and worse where Israeli relations with the U.S. are concerned, that it is hard now for me to imagine them getting better before it is too late.

    Again, nice going, Jewish shills for Obama, nice going.

  5. Israel should not give up, the iranian issues are to late, this was Obama's work, he didn't wanted a strike to Iran, (the same now in Syria), also he wants that Iran has nukes, so the stupid is Netanyahu, should now that, he should remouved now with his leckayers before is to late.

  6. Israel should not give up, the iranian issues are to late, this was Obama's work, he didn't wanted a strike to Iran, (the same now in Syria), also he wants that Iran has nukes, so the stupid is Netanyahu, should now that, he should remouved now with his leckayers before is to late.

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif.
Iran’s Zarif Paints Iran as a Lamb, Israel as the Lion
Latest Indepth Stories
Ron Prosor

Values at the very heart of the UN are threatened by extremist ideologies targeting our way of life

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei

Anti-Semitism today focuses on Israel and the quest to delegitimize it.

Ballots for elections "made in Samaria."

Any Jew who ties his fate to Israel should be able to vote in Israel’s elections-even before aliyah

A young Moshe Meir Weiss introduces his mother, Mrs. Agnes Weiss Goldman, to Rav Moshe in 1979.

There were no airs about him. Rav Moshe was affectionately known as the Gaon of Normalcy.

Israel’s full sovereignty over a united Jerusalem is the only path for true peace in the region.

Just like Moses and Aaron, Mordechai decides to ruin the party…

The president has made clear – I can’t state this more firmly – the policy is Iran will not get a nuclear weapon.

Obama has an apparent inability to understand Islam in particular and Mid-East culture in general

Pesach is a Torah-based holiday whose fundamental observances are rooted in Torah law; Purim is a rabbinic holiday whose laws and customs are grounded in the rabbinic tradition.

In honor of Prime Minister Netanyahu’s successful speech before Congress.

Mr. Spock conveys a message with painfully stark relevance to our world today, especially in the context of PM Netanyahu’s speech to Congress.

Obama created the “partisan politics” by asking Dem. party members to avoid Bibi and his address

Enough is enough. The Jewish community has a big tent, but the NIF should have no place in it.

I vote for the right and get left-wing policy. Every. Frigging. Time.

More Articles from Barry Rubin
Youssef Ziedan

The interviewer responds, “There was also Balfour.”

peace_clowns

If the Obama/Kerry peace deal does go through, what would the risks be?

Let me make it plain. There will be mass murder, even genocide in Syria.

A large number of pro-Obama and radical or even anti-Israel cadre are Jews.

Does anyone think the Palestinian Authority will resist daily attacks from Hamas and Fatah radicals?

Secret Service security arrangements were overruled.

The Obama Administration plan is very simple, assuming that everything goes smoothly–which of course it will not.

The less you know about Islam, the better. Ignorance is strength.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/analysis/rubin-reports/the-solution-how-to-deal-with-obama-middle-east-policy/2013/09/17/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: