web analytics
September 2, 2014 / 7 Elul, 5774
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat (L) visits the JewishPress.com booth at The Event. And the Winners of the JewishPress.com Raffle Are…

Congratulations to all the winners of the JewishPress.com raffle at The Event



The Solution: How to Deal with Obama Middle East Policy

Countries must be ready for a higher level of potential friction with the Obama Administration.
"What you give is what you get." Israelis no longer trust Obama on Israel's security while he negotiates with Iran.

"What you give is what you get." Israelis no longer trust Obama on Israel's security while he negotiates with Iran.

Originally published at Rubin Reports.

To see an alternative policy for the Middle East–presented four years ago and still timely, see:

It is likely that the efforts of the Obama Administration during its second term will fail, not only because of its lack of understanding of the region and its ideology but also due to the specific agenda.

NO MIDDLE EASTERN COUNTRY OR MOVEMENT–ONLY HOSTILE ONES–CAN DEPEND ON THE UNITED STATES.

And to clarify this further:

NO COUNTRY–INCLUDING ISRAEL–CAN DEPEND ON THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION.

But as I noted above, this U.S. policy of Obama’s second term will fail. For example, the main goals of the second term are four big issues:

–Israel-Palestinian peace

–Egypt government coalition with Muslim Brotherhood

–Syrian civil war resolution with rebel victory

–U.S.-Iran rapprochement resolving nuclear issue.

Yet because of irreconcilable differences, these may well be unresolvable. Due to such failures and hardline radical positions (Palestinians, Muslim Brotherhood, Syrian Islamists and regime, Iranian regime), the next administration would probably be forced back on recognition of extremism, support of allies, and U.S. interests.

Thus, regarding the “peace process,” we may well see the typical pattern in which the Palestinians wreck the peace process by rejecting or demanding even more concessions. Once again, it will only be necessary to wait until American negotiators learn better why their goals are impossible. Radicals will just raise their demands and demonstrate their anti-Americanism, and necessary priorities will shift.

The difference this time would be that the policymakers would not learn until the next president. Yet there are other reasons for hope, too, and these must be integrated into the strategies of would-be allies of the United States.

These include several points:

–Since U .S. policies do not take into proper account the legitimate interests of allies, a greater element of defiance will be necessary. With the Saudis, for example, they had to rescue the client regime in Bahrain, because the Obama Administration refused, step in and subsidize the coup regime in Egypt and subsidize the Lebanese opposition.

Countries must be ready for a higher level of potential friction with the Obama Administration, which will not damage future foreign policy when the time comes that the current president will be replaced by a different Democratic or Republican one.

–When required to make a tactical retreat due to lack of U.S. support, it should be stretched out, because the clock is ticking on January 2017.

–Of course the clock is ticking too on wasted time. Iran will be closer to having nuclear weapons, for instance, but that just indicates the actual harm done by the Obama Administration policies. Islamists will also be stronger than would have been true otherwise. This was, however, not true in Egypt, where there was local resistance backed by Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries.

–The creation of parallel alliances and what might be called objective alliances, which can include countries that are nominal enemies. These include building bonds with Asia, including China and India, as powers. In other words, if America will not play a leading or supportive role, others must be found to do so.

But the most important single factor is the genie offer. In this scenario, a genie appears and offers the beneficiary three wishes, but with each one, the genie gives his enemy twice that amount.

Okay, says the clever man, I want to go half bankrupt. (This would make his rival fully bankrupt.)

This is not a joke. The instability, bad economic policies, adventurous actions, and other temptations that American weakness and error lured one into are counterproductive and self-damaging. The best examples are the Muslim Brotherhood’s management of politics and the Palestinians’ overplaying of their hand to lose a real chance to get an independent state. And Syria wrecking itself with Islamists and radical nationalists killing each other.

You could call this the “Home Alone strategy,” which is going to be needed by would-be U.S. allies–at least until responsible adults show up to direct U.S. foreign policy. And that will take at least another 3 years and 4 months.

About the Author: Professor Barry Rubin is director of the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center and editor of the Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal. See the GLORIA/MERIA site at www.gloria-center.org.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

6 Responses to “The Solution: How to Deal with Obama Middle East Policy”

  1. jgray1 says:

    america will not flourish during these next few years. we’d be lucky if we survived. obama has no policies  because he’s vacant. no interior resolve informs him. he just goes with whatever is popular and since that is jew hating that’s where he goes. he is mendacious but he’s also dumber than he is evil. somehow that makes matters even worse.

  2. Ch Hoffman says:

    rubin hates obama more than he loves the us or israel

  3. Obsma hates Israel even more than he hates America, and that is saying something.

  4. Rubin is right on target, mostly, but the real 400-point gorilla in the room – there are actually two of them – are these:

    1. Obviously, the Iran nuke weapons program. This is Obama primary coercive tool in forcing Israel to capitulate on the Pali issue. He won't give it up easily. But this is an existential issue for Israel. She is going to have to act decisively before it is too late…if it isn't already too late. And this will provoke maximum friction with Obama…but Netanyahu has to 'gut it up" anyway.

    2. If Israel does not "cry uncle" on a bogus peace [surrender] deal with the PA, then Obama's "plan B" is not only to let Iran go nuclear and put maximum pressure on Israel not to do anything decisive about this, but also, he'll abandon Israel to the wolves in the UN (i.e., the Arab/Islamist Petrodollar Brothel, New York City Branch). So, Israel not only has to be prepared to hit Iran, but also to fiercely put down Intifada Three, with all the attendant consequences.

    Israel, more than anyone else, is going to have to risk "increased friction" – the understatement of the century – from the U.S. under Obama in the pursuit of her vital and legitimate interests.

    Thanks a great big heap, my fellow Jewish Americans who voted for Obama in droves both times, who gave him big bucks, etc., etc. I don't know if you all bear central responsibility for putting Obama in office – I tend to doubt that, as I see him as more the crowning achievement of the Arab/Islamist Petrodllar Pimp Empire – but IF you are, then it would not surprise me if our G-d got fed up and decided to let Israel fall. Far be it for me to interpret His will and design, but it seems to me like anything is possible now.

    I'm so used to things getting worse and worse where Israeli relations with the U.S. are concerned, that it is hard now for me to imagine them getting better before it is too late.

    Again, nice going, Jewish shills for Obama, nice going.

  5. Israel should not give up, the iranian issues are to late, this was Obama's work, he didn't wanted a strike to Iran, (the same now in Syria), also he wants that Iran has nukes, so the stupid is Netanyahu, should now that, he should remouved now with his leckayers before is to late.

  6. Israel should not give up, the iranian issues are to late, this was Obama's work, he didn't wanted a strike to Iran, (the same now in Syria), also he wants that Iran has nukes, so the stupid is Netanyahu, should now that, he should remouved now with his leckayers before is to late.

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Hamas' Ismail Haniyeh would replace Abbas chairman of the Palestinian Authority if elections were held today.
Poll: Hamas Would Rule Judea and Samaria in New Elections
Latest Indepth Stories
0.5-Shekel-hatasham-RJP

The War projects to lower Israel’s 2014 GDP 0.5% but will have little influence on foreign investors

The_United_Nations_Building

It is in the nature of the Nations of the World to be hostile towards the Jewish People.

champions

Hamas and Islamic Jihad are actually fighting to “liberate Jerusalem and all Palestine.”

IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz reviewing maps on the Golan Heights.

The bad news is that ISIS and Al Qaeda are on the Syrian Golan. The good news is that every terrorist in Syria is killing each other.

The congregants, Ethiopians spanning generations, were beaming with joy and pride.

The withdrawal from the Gaza Strip nine years ago did not enhance Israel’s security.

How does a soldier from a religious home fall in love with a soldier from a non- religious kibbutz?

In 19th century entire ancient Jewish communities fled Palestine to escape brutal Muslim authorities

Responsibility lies with both the UN and Hamas, and better commitments should have been demanded from both parties in the ceasefire.

But the world is forever challenging our Jewish principle and our practices.

If this is how we play the game, we will lose. By that I mean we will lose everything.

Reportedly, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates have formed a bloc that seeks to counter Islamist influence in the Middle East.

One wonders how the IDF could be expected to so quickly determine the facts.

While there is no formula that will work for everyone, there are some strategies that if followed carefully and consistently can help our children – and us – gain the most from the upcoming school year.

More Articles from Barry Rubin
Youssef Ziedan

The interviewer responds, “There was also Balfour.”

peace_clowns

If the Obama/Kerry peace deal does go through, what would the risks be?

Let me make it plain. There will be mass murder, even genocide in Syria.

A large number of pro-Obama and radical or even anti-Israel cadre are Jews.

Does anyone think the Palestinian Authority will resist daily attacks from Hamas and Fatah radicals?

Secret Service security arrangements were overruled.

The Obama Administration plan is very simple, assuming that everything goes smoothly–which of course it will not.

The less you know about Islam, the better. Ignorance is strength.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/analysis/rubin-reports/the-solution-how-to-deal-with-obama-middle-east-policy/2013/09/17/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: