Photo Credit:

Palestinians, they told me, should of course not be blowing up Israeli buses. But you need to see it from their perspective. They’re humiliated with check points and road blocks. To which I always respond, there is no justification whatsoever for targeting children, excuses be damned.

Is it any different when the children who are being targeted are Kurdish, or Syrian, or Arab? They are equally God’s children. And Republicans have been great at making that point strongly, especially in the case of Saddam Hussein. Yes, we’re all Iraq-weary. But I supported the overthrow of Saddam and thought it a great moment in American history because he had murdered tens of thousands of children with mustard gas at Halabjah in April, 1988. So where are the Republican voices of outrage now, when Assad is doing the same thing?

Advertisement

In America we play politics with roads, and subsidies, and unemployment – all important issues. But when it comes to ‘Never Again,’ we have to speak with one voice. ‘Never again’ means just that. Never, ever, ever again. That the world will never again tolerate the mass slaughter of civilians by monsters like Assad. That civilization will never sit passively while brute thugs assail and slaughter the innocent en mass. If you use poison gas you are going to be hit by a Mack truck.

For goodness sake, let’s all get on the same page about this. President Obama has, of late, been exemplary in taking the lead on punishing Syria for atrocities. John Kerry even more so. Please, don’t falter now. Get your backbone back. “Do not murder” means just that. The Ten Commandments are not Democratic or Republican or American or Islamic. They are universal, accepted by all nations at all times.

It’s the 21st century, people. It’s time we finally get serious about stopping mass murder or our passivity will make us complicit.

Advertisement

18 COMMENTS

  1. What about the fact that the “rebels” are allied with – or even largely comprised of- Al Quaeda  terrorists? Do we want to be helping them? There are no innocents here, except for the children. And if we don’t go after the factories that are producing the chemical weapons, what have we gained?

  2. Nuke the damn country for all I care BUT… Where is the freaking proof it was Assad and not the other equally guilty “REBELS” that did it….. Augh!!! (Actually the whole stinking country could be asphalt for all I care). Only thing that thus incident proves is whenever ANY Muslim country get a working delivery system for a nuke…they will use it..

  3. I can understand why people would want to intervene in Syria. But let's remember that this is not the first time chemical weapons were used since this conflict began. The time to intervene was when this event first happened. Over 100,000 people died and the international community did nothing about it. Another factor to consider is that if the U.S. shot missiles into Syria, we would run the risk of this conflict expanding. Most likely it would result in Israel being hit with chemical weapons. In listening to Obama's justification for taking action in Syria, he mentioned it would threaten the security of our allies including Israel. Obama doesn't care what happens to Israel. But, it was an astute way of garnering support. I think what Obama is doing is wise. Having a debate, laying out his reasoning for taking action, and taking a vote. Whatever the results are of that vote should dictate how the U.S. will proceed.

  4. From your response it is obvious you are an Obama hater! If you think "Obama doesn't care about Israel" you are greatly mistaken!

    The fact that he doesn't bang his fist on a table and say if you do anything to harm Israel I will unleash the might of the UNITED STATES and blow your country off the face of the earth in no way manner shape or form makes him not care what happens to Israel, and you should know that. If you don't then the problem is yours and not his!

  5. From your response it is obvious you are an Obama hater! If you think "Obama doesn't care about Israel" you are greatly mistaken!

    The fact that he doesn't bang his fist on a table and say if you do anything to harm Israel I will unleash the might of the UNITED STATES and blow your country off the face of the earth in no way manner shape or form makes him not care what happens to Israel, and you should know that. If you don't then the problem is yours and not his!

  6. As usual Rabbi Shumley is wrong! It is his republican party that is at fault! They are poised to ponce on the President no matter what decision he makes. Bomb them and they will say he didn't tell us so let's impeach him! Don't bomb them and he is a coward and we have to impeach him.

    He has done the wise thing in this case and will let the idiot republicans in congress who demanded the decision making power in this case to make the decision!

    While I do not know the right decision, aiding the government means giving a despot the right to gas his own subjects and helping the rebels gives our enemy al quida a free hand. Which decision is right is a really tough one and to err on the side of caution would be prudent.

    On the other hand if we were to nuke syria back to the stone age, we could reduce the unnecessary population and do away with the middle east problems once and for all and let everyone know not to mess with the U.S. and Israel.
    It's really a tough decisio!

  7. the problem i have with this is did Assad do it or did the rebels do it to garner support and arms for the muslim brotherhood, hamas and al qaeda? not that i think Assad is a good guy however i think he is one step above the others…:( but the truth is that none of them have any problems killing each other to further their own means.

  8. the problem i have with this is did Assad do it or did the rebels do it to garner support and arms for the muslim brotherhood, hamas and al qaeda? not that i think Assad is a good guy however i think he is one step above the others…:( but the truth is that none of them have any problems killing each other to further their own means.

  9. the problem i have with this is did Assad do it or did the rebels do it to garner support and arms for the muslim brotherhood, hamas and al qaeda? not that i think Assad is a good guy however i think he is one step above the others…:( but the truth is that none of them have any problems killing each other to further their own means.

  10. the Love Guru, former dating expert, and failed candidate on the "I'll Kiss Adelson's Behind" Ticket has as much to add to the discussion of Syria as he has in weighing in on "love and kaballah" for dummies.

    He's against Obama for being Obama, and he's against some Republicans because they're sick of being led to war while their constituents want nothing to do with it.

    If all his concerns are humanitarian, he woke up at a very convenient time. Where was he when Rwanda was going though its agony; where was he for a dozen other causes. Or is it just that Obama's on side A so he believes in his distorted heart of Limbaugh hearts that he should be on the other.

  11. Big mouth Obama with his show media, he washed his hands and gave the ball to the congress, in case that the congress don't accept the US to strike, he will blame the Republicans becouse they are againt of the strike, in case that the congress would accept to strike, he also will blame the Republicans becouse they accepted, so the best that the US should not get involved in Syria, it is sad to say let them kill and eat each other, sunnies, shiites, hezbollah, alkaeda, they are also so ferous like Assad and his army, so is not a justification that the US strikes against Syria, it is to wonder that the Arab Leage says nothing, it is nonsence to start a new adventure.

  12. What Obama's going to do is bomb Syria, using his authority in the War Powers Act to do so, while making the Republicans look like idiots and total hypocrites when they vote down an attack on Syria. After all, wasn't it the Right, starting with Dick Cheney, who beat the war drums back in 2003, when we went to war with Iraq? And wasn't it the Right which claimed Saddam had chemical weapons? (Turns out he actually did have a few, but they were old, obsolete, and useless.)

    Now we have incontrovertible proof that Assad used them to kill civilians — over 1,400 of them, of which about 500 were kids. Yes, we will attack him, and hopefully our attack will send a Tomahawk right up Bashar's ASSad, blowing out his brains in the process. I'm with the WSJ on this, our attack needs to do some real damage, and be more "shock" than "awe." Thus I believe Obama (and Kerry) are playing rope-a-dope with the conservatives in Congress.

    But Shmuley knows exactly why the Republicans aren't supporting Obama on this. It's because their foreign policy is identical to their domestic policy: Make Obama look bad. Period.

Loading Facebook Comments ...