web analytics
May 20, 2013 /11 Sivan, 5773
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
jumping Following a Passion for Sports to Israel

In Israel, a new five month scholarship program being offered to young aspiring athletes – one of them could be you.



Home » InDepth » Columns »

Freedom And The Middle East

tell a friend

Even for a region that has experienced more than its fair share of upheaval, the downfall of Egyptian dictator Hosni Mubarak last week was nothing less than a political earthquake.
 
After just 18 days of unyielding protests, the largest and most powerful Arab country in the Middle East saw its regime swept away with relative ease, something that could not have gone unnoticed by other regional potentates.
 
All it took was a little “people power,” and some smoldering fury, to unseat a man who had long ago become a fixture on the scene.
 
Needless to say, the wily Mubarak did not go without a fight. Like any autocrat, he sought to stifle the mounting pressure for his removal by resorting to various tried and true methods, from censoring the media to sending in goon squads to attack the protesters.
 
But it all came to naught, as a new order succeeded in vanquishing him.
 
Mubarak’s demise marked the second time in the past month that an Arab despot once thought invincible was dispatched into early retirement.
 
On January 14, Tunisian president Zine al-Abedine Ben Ali was forced to flee to Saudi Arabia after a wave of protests brought about an end to his 23-year-long rule.
 
And now, from Algiers to Amman, there is growing impatience on the Arab street with the authoritarian governments in place throughout the area.
 
           Mubarak’s departure is likely to inspire young Syrians, Yemenites and others to try and shake off their own shackles and usher in a new era of greater freedom.
 
But just how far afield the tremors emanating from Cairo will be felt is open to question.
 
Jordan’s King Abdullah and Syria’s Bashar al-Assad have already taken steps to try to appease their subjects, tossing them a few democratic bones in the hopes it will satisfy their appetites and keep them from storming the local version of the Bastille.
 
And there is hardly going to be any additional outside pressure coming from the U.S. or Europe, given the fear that growing instability will bring down other pro-Western Arab regimes.
 
Nonetheless, you can almost hear the hearts of Arab leaders beating louder and faster as they ponder their own fates in an increasingly dynamic and uncertain situation.
 
The Arab world, after all, is still a living encyclopedia of outmoded forms of government, from sultanates such as Oman and emirates such as Qatar, to thuggish dictatorships such as Syria and dynastic monarchies along the lines of Jordan.
 
It may be a political scientist’s dream, but it is a nightmare for the hundreds of millions of Arabs chafing under oppression and tyranny.
 
Basic and fundamental freedoms such as personal autonomy and individual rights are routinely trampled upon, and ethnic and religious minority groups suffer extreme discrimination and intolerance. Just ask Coptic Christians in Egypt, Baha’is in Iran or Shi’ites in Saudi Arabia for starters.
 
This was borne out most recently by a report issued by Freedom House, the independent Washington-based group that advocates for freedom worldwide. According to its annual survey, “Freedom in the World,” of the 18 countries in the Middle East, only one is considered to be “free.”
 
And that one, of course, is Israel.
 
Not a single Arab country – not one – did Freedom House consider fully “free.”
 
In effect, then, this means that of the approximately 370 million human beings currently residing in the Middle East, only 2 percent enjoy true freedom – namely, those who live in the Jewish state.
 
With the world’s attention focused on the region, it is essential to underline the repressive and high-handed nature of the various Arab regimes. Pro-Israel activists need to make the case that if there is apartheid to be found in the Middle East, it is in those Arab countries that oppress the majority of their citizens while denying them the basic right to elect their own leaders.
 
Now is the time to drive home the extent of “Arab Apartheid” while emphasizing the danger this poses to the West and its interests.
 
Doing so could reframe the debate and generate greater sympathy and understanding for the challenges facing Israel.
 
Sure, no one knows what democracy might bring to Egypt and elsewhere, and the threat of Islamist fundamentalists taking over is very real. It will require great diplomatic skill, and some profound strategic thinking, to navigate the coming weeks and months.
 

But we cannot and must not miss out on this opportunity to remind the world of a very crucial truth: Israel is living in a neighborhood ruled largely by bullies and brutes.

 

 

Michael Freund is chairman of Shavei Israel (www.shavei.org), a Jerusalem-based organization that reaches out and assists “lost Jews” seeking to return to the Jewish people. His Jewish Press-exclusive column appears the third week of each month.

tell a friend

About the Author: Jason Maoz is the Senior Editor of The Jewish Press.


You might also be interested in:


no comments

You must log in to post a comment.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Jamal al-Dura and his 12-year-old son Muhammad under fire
Israel Explodes the ‘Big Lie’ – Gaza Al Dura Boy Wasn’t Killed
Latest Indepth Stories
Japanese Muslim

The Japanese do not feel the need to apologize to Muslims for the negative way in which they relate to Islam.

Portugal's national soccer team coach Luiz Felipe Scolari with young Israeli and Palestinian soccer players, June, 2007

Palestinian youths from Hebron, though, who met with Israelis near Bethlehem to share their problems and insights have been forced to issue a statement distancing themselves from the meeting.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton testifying about the September, 2012 attack in Benghazi, Libya.

Benghazi isn’t likely to keep Hillary out of the Democratic field in 2016, but after 2008, she is justifiably paranoid.

Housing and Construction Minister Uri Ariel.

The contractors received the land at a bargain basement price, moved the prices up to 1.8 million NIS and pocketed one million NIS per apartment.

Many of my fellow college students are quick to voice their acceptance of their LGBT friends, but they turn up their noses and frown slightly when they speak of a Hasid.

The growing revelations that the Obama State Department watered down public statements on the attack in order to cleanse them of any mention of al Qaeda and terrorism is a travesty.

We must confront Islamist groups with what Prime Minister David Cameron referred to as “muscular liberalism.”

Al-Qaradawi’s visit and statements also serve as a reminder that the Israeli-Arab conflict is centered, more than ever, around religion.

Everyone who reads newspapers should know at least one thing. Threats to annihilate Israel have always been unremarkable. Almost never, it seems, have Israel’s existential enemies sought any reason for concealment.

Mark Treyger, a candidate for city council in New York City’s 47th council district, met recently with the editorial board of The Jewish Press at the newspaper’s Boro Park office.

Israel’s government did not want to liberate Jerusalem. Or to be more specific, the Labor and National Religious Party ministers did not want to liberate Jerusalem. “Who needs that whole Vatican?” Defense Minister Moshe Dayan explained at the time.

Last Friday, the Western Wall underwent an unwelcome transformation from sacred site to media circus as the group known as the Women of the Wall sought to hold a decidedly non-traditional prayer service.

Two recent revelations have raised serious questions about the kind of government President Obama is running.

Readers of my monthly Baseball Insider column may have noticed its absence last week (the column appears in the second issue of every month). The reason for that is I have something more serious and personal to share with you, something that didn’t seem appropriate for a baseball column.

More Articles from Jason Maoz
Front-Page-040513

I was shamed into becoming a baseball fan by my mother, a Holocaust survivor who came to America in 1953 and who to this day doesn’t know the difference between a home run and a strikeout.

Michael Kelly

The late Michael Kelly was a brilliant writer and editor (The New York Times, Washington Post, The New Republic, The Atlantic) who coincidentally happened to be an American patriot and a strong supporter of Israel – a combination not commonly found in the circles in which he traveled.

Even as he left office in January 2002 on a note of unprecedented triumph and popularity, the tone of the New York Times’s editorials and most of its news coverage was startlingly jaundiced.

Koch became a chronic – some would say compulsive – critic of Giuliani.

Resnick has collected five dozen of his best interviews in book format. Called “Movers and Shakers: Sixty Prominent Personalities Speak Their Mind on Tape” (Brenn Books), the collection includes updates on nearly every interviewee plus several questions that never appeared in The Jewish Press.

Al Gore has been in the news again, and even some of his biggest admirers are upset with Gore’s decision to sell his Current TV cable network to Al Jazeera, which is owned by the oil-rich Islamic monarchy of Qatar, for $500 million.

Ehud Barak may or may not be out of Israeli politics for good, but his recent resignation announcement reminded the Monitor of just how much the man had been willing to give up to Yasir Arafat at the tail end of Bill Clinton’s presidency.

Roughly 30 percent of those Jews who had voted for Reagan in 1980 went for Mondale in 1984.

    Latest Poll

    Which is the most beautiful location in Jerusalem?









    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/freedom-and-the-middle-east/2011/02/16/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online:

Close