web analytics
November 26, 2014 / 4 Kislev, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
IDC Herzliya Campus A Day on Campus

To mark IDC Herzliya’s 20th anniversary, we spent a day following Prof. Uriel Reichman, IDC’s founder and president, and Jonathan Davis, VP for External Relations, around its delightful campus.



Home » InDepth » Columns »

Justice For Demjanjuk

   At first glance, it would appear that a modicum of justice has finally been meted out in the case of Nazi guard John Demjanjuk.
 
   At a court in Munich last week, the 91-year old Demjanjuk was convicted of assisting in the murder of 27,900 Jewish men, women and children at the Sobibor death camp in Poland.
 
   The presiding judge, Ralph Alt, sentenced Demjanjuk to five years in prison, and the trial succeeded in casting a spotlight on the evil committed against the Jewish people during the Holocaust.
 
   And so Demjanjuk will at last be made to pay for his involvement in unspeakable acts of horror.
 
   Or will he?
 
   Upon further reflection, it becomes clear the outcome of this trial was in fact a travesty.
 
   To begin with, consider the sentence. Five years for participating in mass murder? That comes out to little more than just 90 minutes in jail for each person he helped kill. Can that be called justice by any measure?
 
   Further, moments after reading out the sentence, Judge Alt ruled there was no compelling reason to remand Demjanjuk until his appeal is heard. “The defendant,” Alt stated, “is released.”
 
   Demjanjuk was just convicted of taking part in the greatest crime of the 20th century. Why should he now be permitted to roam free?
 
   The judge, apparently, seems inclined to show mercy to Demjanjuk, a quality the latter never demonstrated to those he herded into the gas chambers.
 
   Nonetheless, Alt insisted that incarcerating him even for five years is “not commensurate” with such an elderly defendant.
 
   Speaking to journalists after the hearing, the judge noted that “It doesn’t seem likely that Demjanjuk will actually serve any more time in the end. The appeal will take at least a year and at that time his health may not allow putting him in prison.”
 
   So there you have it. Even after being convicted, and even if his sentence is upheld on appeal, Demjanjuk is liable to remain a free man.
 
   The injustice of this outcome is simply inconceivable and the message it sends is chilling: if you manage to evade justice long enough, you need not worry about paying for your crimes.
 
   Consider the following: at the start of Demjanjuk’s trial in 2009, German prosecutor Hans-Joachim Lutz said, “As a guard, he took part in all the various parts of the extermination process after the deportation trains arrived. He willingly participated in the killing of the Jews because he wanted them dead for his own racist ideological reasons.”
 
   Lutz noted that Demjanjuk unloaded Jews from the trains arriving at Sobibor, undressed them and herded them directly to their deaths in the gas chambers.
 
   Hence, the leniency being shown to Demjanjuk by the German justice system is as misplaced as it is inappropriate.
 
   To be sure, there is something reassuring about the fact that the perpetrators of the Holocaust are still being pursued. The Demjanjuk trial does prove once again that the atrocities inflicted on our people in the killing fields of Europe have not become just a stale detail of history.
 

   And it will help inform a new generation of Germans about what their forefathers did to the Jewish people, and remind them of the everlasting debt they owe to our nation.

   At a time when Europe is turning increasingly hostile both to Jews and to Israel, this is a lesson that bears reinforcing.
 
   But there is still another disturbing element to this trial, and it has to do with its location.
 
   With all due respect to the German prosecutor, the trial of Demjanjuk should have taken place in Jerusalem, not in Munich.
 
   Jump back to July 1993. After Demjanjuk had been found guilty of being the infamous killer dubbed “Ivan the Terrible” of Treblinka, his lawyers appealed to Israel’s Supreme Court. The justices ruled that the case had not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, so they set aside the conviction.
 
   But in their decision, the justices also declared that even if Demjanjuk was not “Ivan the Terrible,” he had clearly done some terrible things.
 
   They found there to be “overwhelming evidence” that Demjanjuk had “participated in murder” at Sobibor, which are the very charges for which he was just convicted in Germany.
 
   Nonetheless, then-attorney-general Yosef Harish turned down pleas from Holocaust survivors and Knesset members and refused to retry Demjanjuk for his crimes at Sobibor. Various petitioners immediately turned to the Supreme Court in an attempt to force Harish’s hand before Demjanjuk left the country.
 
   Astonishingly, at the hearings, the state’s representative, Nili Arad, told the justices that Israel would not pursue further legal proceedings against Demjanjuk, claiming “it is not in the public interest for this man to be put on trial.”
 
   The justices refused to intervene, sadly demonstrating that a court of law is not always necessarily a court of justice. Shortly thereafter, Demjanjuk returned to the United States, where he was later stripped of his American citizenship and sent to Europe for trial.
 
   In other words, the State of Israel knowingly and willfully allowed a participant in the Nazi murder machine to escape prosecution in Jerusalem, leaving it to others to do the job.
 
   This was nothing less than an act of ignominy. There was clearly enough evidence to justify putting the Sadist of Sobibor on trial in Israel, but politics and public relations appear to have gotten in the way.
 
   And so it took another 18 years for Demjanjuk to be convicted for his deeds. Who knows how many of those he tormented may have died in the interim, going to their graves without seeing justice done.
 
   Like others, I followed the Demjanjuk trial through the press, hoping he would get his due. But the sense of bitterness and disappointment is palpable.
 

   Israel had this murderer in its hands, and it let him go. And now, he will most likely never serve another day in prison.

 

 

 

   Michael Freund is chairman of Shavei Israel (www.shavei.org), a Jerusalem-based organization that assists “lost Jews” seeking to return to the Jewish people.

About the Author: Jason Maoz is the Senior Editor of The Jewish Press.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Justice For Demjanjuk”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Lutfu Turkkan, Turkish legislator, introduced legislation into Turkish parliament to label Israel a terrorist state
Turkish Legislator Pens Bill Naming Israel Terrorist State
Latest Indepth Stories
Red Line Obama

“What’s a line between friends?”

West_Bank_&_Gaza_Map_2007_(Settlements)

Unrest in YESHA and J’m helps Abbas and Abdullah defuse anger, gain politically and appear moderates

Thousands of rabbis pose in front of Chabad-Lubavitch headquarters in Brooklyn on Sunday during the annual International Conference of Chabad-Lubavitch Emissaries.

A “Shliach” means to do acts with complete devotion and dedication in order to help bring Moshiach.

Arabs create opening for terrorists to walk the security wall between Ramallah and Jerusalem and Ramallah.

The pogroms in Chevron took place eighty five years ago, in 1929; the Holocaust began seventy-five years ago in 1939; the joint attack of Israel’s neighbors against the Jewish State of Israel happened sixty-six years ago… yet, world history of anti-Semitism did not stop there, but continues until today. Yes, the primitive reality of Jews […]

“We don’t just care for the children; we make sure they have the best quality of life.”

“Why do people get complacent with the things they’re told?”

Arab opposition to a Jewish State of any size was made known by word and deed in the form of terror

Operation Moses: First time in history that non-blacks came to Africa to free blacks from oppression

As Arabs murder and maim Jews, Jordan’s leaders bark the blood libel of “Israeli aggression.”

Perhaps attacking a terrorist’s legacy broadly and publicly would dissuade others from terrorism?

R’ Aryeh yelled “Run, I’ll fight!” Using a chair against terrorists to buy time so others could flee

Riot started when Muslim students wore the Pal. kaffiyeh and Druze students demanded them removed

The “Media” didn’t want us to know what a kind, giving, loving young woman Dalia was.

A “Palestine” could become another Lebanon, with many different factions battling for control.

Maimonides himself walked and prayed in the permissible areas when he visited Eretz Yisrael in 1165

Having a strong community presence at the polls shows our elected officials we care about the issues

More Articles from Jason Maoz
Comptroller DiNapoli celebrates Sukkot with Crown Heights Jewish community leaders at the sukkah of Rabbi Chanina Sperlin of the Crown Heights Jewish Community Council.

The New York State comptroller manages the state’s $180.7 billion pension fund, audits the spending practices of all state agencies and local governments, oversees the New York State and Local Retirement System, reviews the New York State and City budgets, and approves billions in State contracts and spending.

Front-Page-102414

While not all criticism of Israel stemmed from anti-Semitism, Podhoretz contends the level of animosity towards Israel rises exponentially the farther left one moved along the spectrum.

When you grow up in a home where your parents went through what my parents went through, you realize that life has to be meaningful. You have to be there for other people.

“It’s a lousy column and a dishonest one,” Halberstam wrote. “So close it. Or you will end up just as shabby as Safire.”

Wye would be seen to have set the groundwork for the creation of a Palestinian state

These are not necessarily the best all-around biographies or studies of the individual presidents listed (though some rank right up there), but the strongest in terms of exploring presidential attitudes and policies toward Israel.

The Clintonan “engagement” liberals remember with such fondness did nothing but embolden Arafat and Hamas and Hizbullah as they witnessed Israel’s only real ally elevate process ahead of policy.

What really makes one wonder about the affinity felt by certain Jews for Grant was the welcome mat he put out for some of the country’s most pernicious anti-Semites.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/justice-for-demjanjuk/2011/05/18/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: