When we talk about developing Jerusalem and ensuring that it remains united under Jewish sovereignty, what could be more critical than actually building Jewish housing? Yet it is an open secret that the Netanyahu government has been waging a long-running general construction freeze in the Jewish areas of Judea and Samaria (Yesha), as well as in the liberated areas of Yerushalayim.
Former housing minister Ariel Attias recently made it quite clear: “A permanent freeze was in place in Yesha,” he said, “except for when they decided to let up; for instance, after the tragic incident in Itamar [when Palestinian terrorists brutally slaughtered Itamar residents Rabbi and Mrs. Fogel and three of their children in their home], and when Beit El’s Givat HaUlpena was destroyed, a few hundred housing units were approved.”
But in Jerusalem, when nothing out of the ordinary occurs, construction in neighborhoods such as Har Homa and Pisgat Ze’ev is simply not approved. For example, the Regional Planning Committee OK’d 1,500 new units in Ramat Shlomo – between Ramot and French Hill – over a half-year ago, subject to certain changes. The changes were submitted to the Interior Ministry six weeks ago. Since then – nothing. Army Radio reported that the relevant authorities in the ministry had received a directive straight from the Prime Minister’s Office not to approve the plan, because of the “diplomatic sensitivity.”
True, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry has repeatedly reprimanded Israel for continuing to build in Yesha, no matter how slowly and insufficiently. But those of us who wish to see Jerusalem as Israel’s united and Jewish capital secured by Jewish population centers on all sides expect that Prime Minister Netanyahu will know how to respond.
We expect that he will tell Secretary Kerry: “What we want is a comprehensive solution – and it will come only via direct negotiations with the Palestinian Authority. We have been seeking this for years, only to be thwarted by the PA’s illogical and unjust ultimatum: ‘No construction or no peace talks.’ As if it’s only in our interest to have such talks!”
We expect that Netanyahu will continue: “Jewish construction is simply an excuse for the Palestinians. The PLO was established with the purpose of destroying Israel in 1964, well before Israel even controlled Judea and Samaria. Israel froze settlement building for three months after the Camp David treaty, hoping to entice other Arab entities to make peace with Israel – but they were not interested. The PA agreed to sign the Oslo Agreements in 1993 and 1995, even though Yesha was undergoing significant Jewish growth. My predecessors Ehud Barak and Ehud Olmert said they would dismantle dozens of Jewish towns and give the PA control of some 95 percent of Yesha – but the PA refused.”
Netanyahu clearly remembers his own efforts to engage the PA in 2010, when he froze construction for ten painful months – and still, the PA refused to talk. “Jewish construction in Yesha was never linked to peace talks before then,” he should say, “so why now?”
He should demand of Mr. Kerry: “What possible justification is there to pressure us not to build in areas that everyone knows will never be transferred to Arab control, such as Jerusalem and settlement blocs?”
Finally, we would expect the prime minister to explain, “It is simply unjust to expect us to stop building in Yesha. Hundreds of thousands of Jews live there, and the harmful effects of a construction freeze extend into many areas of their lives. Are they to be expected to suffer while the PA dillies and dallies over peace talks?”
No doubt, Netanyahu has raised these points, as well as many others. But he seems to have capped them off with, “Despite all this, we won’t build, so that no one will blame us.”
We insist that he should replace that weak-kneed stance with this: “And that’s why we stand tall and proud for our historic and national rights to build homes for the myriads of Jews who have returned to their homeland, the one place where they belong and can feel safe.”
* * * * *
We asked Jerusalem Municipal Councilman Yair Gabbai, a member of the Jerusalem Construction and Planning Committee, the status of construction in the capital. “Several important projects are simply stuck,” he answered, “meaning that they are just not being passed on to the next stage in the approval process.”
About the Author: Chaim Silberstein is president of Keep Jerusalem-Im Eshkachech and the Jerusalem Capital Development Fund. He was formerly a senior adviser to Israel's minister of tourism. Hillel Fendel, past senior editor at Israel National News/Arutz-7, is a veteran writer on Jerusalem affairs. Both have lived in Jerusalem and now reside in Beit El.
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.
If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.