web analytics
May 27, 2015 / 9 Sivan, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Acknowledging National Mortality: Israel’s Ironic Imperative


Beres-Louis-Rene

            Jorge Luis Borges, the very special Argentine writer and philosopher, sometimes quite happily identified himself as a sort of Jew. Although lacking any apparent basis in halacha, he nonetheless felt himself to be a deeply kindred spirit: “Many a time I think of myself as a Jew,” he is quoted in Willis Barnstone’s Borges at Eighty: Conversations (1982), “but I wonder whether I have the right to think so. It may be wishful thinking.”
            How marvelous to hear such pleasing words. After all, any such explicit philo-Semitic sentiment is assuredly rare, especially when it is uttered in sincerity by one of the modern world’s greatest authors. It follows, in my judgment, that Jews and Israelis ought to pay especially close attention to certain hidden implications of Borges’ ecumenical wisdom.
            Consider this: In one of his very best stories, a condemned man, having noticed that human expectations rarely coincide with reality, consciously imagines the circumstances of his own death.  Because they have become expectations, he reasons, they can never actually happen. 
            So it should now be with the State of Israel.  Recognizing that fear and reality go together naturally, the people of Israel should begin to consciously imagine themselves (even as the ingathered Jewish community which has been scripturally promised a distinct permanence or eternity), to be living within the contingentspace of individual and collective mortality.  Only then, it seems could Israel effectively undertake the specific political and military policies that are now needed to secure it from forcible extinction.
            After all, to conclude that G-d’s promise should allow Israel to simply sit back and automatically assume a Higher sphere of protection, irrespective of prudent strategic preparations, would be to fundamentally misunderstand both Torah and Talmud.
            On another level, however, the advice to encourage national existential apprehensions may still appear foolish.  Isn’t fear of death starkly debilitating? Most people, we already know, try to diminish this fear as best they can.
            Anxiety, it should seem plain, is an obvious expression of weakness. What possible advantages could there possibly be to deliberately nurturing any thoughts of national fear and trembling; indeed, of existential dread and disappearance?
             Here is a response. Truth sometimes emerges only through paradox, and imaginations of a collective immortality, imaginations generally encouraged by a panoply of false hopes and false dawns, willdiscourage needed Israeli steps toward collective self-preservation.   Even in those expanding circles of enlightenment, where there is no longer any faith in an always-delusional peace process, many Israelis will instinctually resist any intimations of national annihilation.  Unable to understand that what is true for individuals is also true for states, these Jewish citizens will stubbornly choose to imagine an Israel that is automaticallyforever.  The predictable result of any such corrosively wrongheaded imagination would be an even greater level of Jewish national transience.
 
           There are multiple ironies here.  In the fashion of many of its Arab/Islamic enemies, Israel insistently still imagines for itself, either scripturally or strategically (or both), only life everlasting.  But, unlike these enemies, Israel does not see itself achieving immortality, individually or collectively by the ritual murder of its enemies.  Rather, it sees its collective survival as the permanentproduct of divine protection, reasoned diplomatic settlements, and/or prudent military planning.
            Singly or collectively, and in any conceivable configuration or permutation, there is nothing inherently wrong with these particular expectations; still, they should never be allowed to displace a pragmatic prior awareness of an always-possiblenational impermanence.
             Any asymmetry of purpose and expectation between Israel and its implacable Islamic foes will place the Jewish state at a notable and foreseeable disadvantage.  While Israel’s enemies, most notably Iran, now manifest their positive hopes for immortality by the always-intended slaughter of Jews, Israel’s leaders display their country’s own expectations for collective immortality by agreeing to steadily incremental surrenders of vital territories. Most recently, Prime Minister Netanyahu expressly added the caveat of Palestinian demilitarization, but, as everyone already understands, this remains an utterly implausible and disingenuous expectation.
             In the end, the protracted clash in the Middle East between Arab/Islamic believers in violence, and Israeli believers in Reason, will likely favor the former.  In the end,unless the prevailing asymmetry is replaced by new and far-reaching Israeli imaginations of existential disaster,the Jewish believers in mutual understanding will have to depart once again from the Promised Land. 
            It is difficult, of course, to ask Israelis to resist American-style positive thinking, and, instead, to think the worst.  Yet as Swiss playwright Friedrich Durrenmatt says, “The worst does sometimes happen,” and it would now be far better for Israel to err on the side of excessive pessimism.  Only then, spurred on by the most conspicuously dreadful imaginations of disaster, could the people of Israel begin to contemplate the irremediably brutal connections between Palestinian statehood, Iranian nuclearization, and apocalyptic war. 
      
      The alternative, to blindly accept the dreadfully twisted cartography of President Obama’s road map, and/or to resignedly accept the interpenetrating inevitability of nuclear weapons in Iran, could precipitate Israel’s final defeat.

     

       Exeunt Omnes?

 

            LOUIS RENÉ BERES (Ph.D., Princeton, 1971) lectures and publishes widely on Israeli security matters. He was born in Zürich, Switzerland, and served as Chair of Project Daniel. Professor Beres is Strategic and Military Affairs columnist for The Jewish Press.

About the Author: Louis René Beres (Ph.D., Princeton, 1971) is professor of political science and international law at Purdue University and the author of many books and articles dealing with international relations and strategic studies.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Acknowledging National Mortality: Israel’s Ironic Imperative”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Ayelet Shaked
The Dangerous Ms. Shaked
Latest Indepth Stories
Ayelet Shaked

Netanyahu so disdains Shaked’s appointment he completely ignored her after the swearing-in ceremony

Tel Aviv University Insignia

Ronen Shamir’s just the latest tenured Leftist convicted of sexual misconduct with his own student

The New York Times

NY Times precious front page ink is only reserved for portrayals of Israel as the aggressor.

Mendlowitz-052215-Ruchie

Although I loved law school, I doubted myself: Who would come to me, a chassidish woman lawyer?

American Jews who go gaga for Obama are first and foremost “Liberals of the Mosaic Persuasion”

“Illinois is the first state to take concrete, legally binding action against the BDS campaign”

Many books have supported the preferability- not to be confused with desirability- of the status quo

Consider the Pope’s desperation, reading daily reports of the slaughter of Christians by Muslims

The contrast between a Dem pretending to love Israel & a Dem who truly loves Israel is CRYSTAL CLEAR

Pentecost, derived from the Greek word for 50, is celebrated 50 days after Easter.

U.S and European demands for the creation of a Palestinian State in the West Bank is world hypocrisy.

We take a whole person approach, giving our people assistance with whatever they need.

During my spiritual journey I discovered G-d spoke to man only once, to the Jewish people at Sinai

20 years after the great Ethiopian aliyah, we must treat them like everyone else; no better or worse

Connecting Bamidbar&Shavuot is simple-A world without Torah is midbar; with Torah a blessed paradise

Many Black protesters compared Baltimore’s unrest to the Palestinian penchant of terrorism & rioting

More Articles from Louis Rene Beres

A “Palestine” could become another Lebanon, with many different factions battling for control.

Louis Rene Beres

President Obama’s core argument on a Middle East peace process is still founded on incorrect assumptions.

Once upon a time in America, every adult could recite at least some Spenglerian theory of decline.

President Obama’s core argument is still founded on incorrect assumptions.

Specific strategic lessons from the Bar Kokhba rebellion.

Still facing an effectively unhindered nuclear threat from Iran, Israel will soon need to choose between two strategic options.

For states, as for individuals, fear and reality go together naturally.

So much of the struggle between Israel and the Arabs continues to concern space.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/louis-bene-beres/acknowledging-national-mortality-israels-ironic-imperative/2011/09/21/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: