web analytics
July 26, 2014 / 28 Tammuz, 5774
Israel at War: Operation Protective Edge
 
 
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
IDC Advocacy Room IDC Fights War on Another Front

Student Union opens ‘hasbara’ room in effort to fill public diplomacy vacuum.



After Fatah-Hamas Reconciliation The Endless Futility Of Israel’s ‘Peace Process’ (Conclusion)


Beres-Louis-Rene

            When on October 6, 1973, Egyptian and Syrian surprise attacks came dangerously close to jeopardizing Israel’s survival, it was because of a monumental intelligence failure.  Similarly, on January 18, 1991, the scream of air-raid sirens could be heard in every corner of Israel.  The Iraqi Scuds that slammed through Tel Aviv and Haifa neighborhoods had caught the country, in the words of a former Israeli intelligence chief, “with its pants down.”  In the latter case, the only element that saved Israel was Iraq’s notably ineffectual warheads.  If they had not been so ineffectual, Israel could have suffered profoundly, if not existentially.
            A’man’s (IDF Intelligence Branch) record of intermittent failure is noteworthy.  While it is too late to rectify prior mistakes, important lessons can still be learned for the future.  The most important of all such lessons is this:  Before you take comfort from what the experts have had to say about “Palestine,” recall that their record has sometimes been seriously flawed.
            Now Israel is confronted especially by Iranian nuclearization, a developing menace of potentially existential import.  Although Israel’s leaders may maintain that this menace is somehow unrelated to Palestinian statehood, exactly the opposite is true. 
            In a few years, Iran will likely have the capacity to launch nuclear missiles against Israel from its own territory. While this would not require the strategic advantages of a cooperative “Palestine,” its willingness to launch will be enlarged by the antecedent Oslo/Road Map/UN dismemberment of Israel.  The overall effect of such dismemberment will be to weaken Israel generally, including its basic will to resist.
            Preemption, in some form (and this includes newly promising and non-explosive forms of cyber defense and cyber-warfare), may still be essential to Israel’s survival. Oslo/Road Map expectations may have prevented Israel from striking preemptively in a more timely fashion.  In a Middle East shaped by “Peace Process” expectations, such a strike could have appeared as inexcusably belligerent, thus upsetting the delicate peacemaking then underway.  Naturally, the “civilized world,” even after acknowledging that Israel has always been the only viable democracy in the Middle East, would never have tolerated such Israeli “aggressions.” 
            What if Menachem Begin had thought this way back in June 1981?  What if he had chosen to forgo the preemption option against Iraq at that time? What sorts of warheads would have then been fitted on Iraqi Scuds ten years later? 
  
           While Begin’s timely actions at Osiraq (Operation Opera) did probably save the country from “another Holocaust” (Begin’s own words after the uniquely successful raid), Prime Ministers Barack, Sharon, Olmert and Netanyahu all refused to act against Iran.    
       
           As for the intermittent sanctions imposed by the U.N. and U.S., they have been no more than a fly on the elephant’s back.
            General Yitzhak Rabin, on the eve of the Yom Kippur War, assured his countrymen that the Arabs would not attack.  This view, derivative from the similarly misconceived assessment of then Minister of Defense Moshe Dayan, came to be known in Israel as the mechdal, the concept or idea that the enemy is not preparing for war.  A scant twenty-four hours before the attack, A’man’s official estimate on the probability of war, according to Chaim Herzog, was “the lowest of the low.” 

            Today, even after the Arab world and parts of North Africa undergo far-reaching internal turmoil and political re-fashioning, Israel faces another mechdal, an omission, an instance of nonperformance, an expression of neglect with vastly more catastrophic potential.  This time, perhaps, “The Concept” could produce an effective end to the Third Temple Commonwealth, a “solution” that Israel’s enemies would describe as final.

            Under international law, Israel was never under any binding obligation to comply withOslo. On the contrary, the Jewish state has always been legally obliged to terminate this set of asymmetrical agreements with terrorists.  Should Israel’s current prime minister manage somehow to avoid “Palestine,” Israel may still have a secure future.  But, should a newly-reconciled Fatah-Hamasunity government soon give way to a genuine Palestinian state, and one that would be unambiguously militarized, Israel’s long-term survival will have become problematic.

            The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) was founded in 1964, three years before there were any “occupied territories.”

            What, precisely, was the PLO seeking to “liberate?”  The answer, of course, is all of Israel. Today, nothing has changed.

            The more things change, the more they remain the same.

 

LOUIS RENÉ BERES  was educated at Princeton (Ph.D., 1971), and is the author of many books and articles dealing with international relations and international law.  In the United States,  he has worked for over forty years on international law and nuclear strategy matters, both as a scholar, and as a lecturer/consultant to various agencies of the United States Government.  In Israel, he has lectured widely at various academic centers for strategic studies, at the Dayan Forum, and at the National Defense College (IDF).  Professor Beres was Chair of Project Daniel. Born in Zürich, Switzerland, he is Strategic and Military Affairs columnist for The Jewish Press.

About the Author: Louis René Beres, strategic and military affairs columnist for The Jewish Press, is professor of Political Science at Purdue University. Educated at Princeton (Ph.D., 1971), he lectures and publishes widely on international relations and international law and is the author of ten major books in the field. In Israel, Professor Beres was chair of Project Daniel.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “After Fatah-Hamas Reconciliation The Endless Futility Of Israel’s ‘Peace Process’ (Conclusion)”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Soldiers take wounded comrade wounded in Gaza from helicopter to Soroka Hospital in Be'er Sheva.
Hamas Fires while Israel Extends Ceasefire
Latest Indepth Stories
Jewish Home leader Naftali Bennett

Because let’s face it: Hamas obviously can’t defeat the IDF in the field, soldier against soldier

Shimon Peres meets with the family of fallen IDF soldier Max Steinberg.

As Peres retires, Israel fights sour legacy: Insistence on setting policy in line with hopes, rather than with reality.

Keeping-Jerusalem

Our capital was not arbitrarily chosen, as capitals of some other nations were.

UNHRC High Commissioner Navi Pillay accuses the IDF of possible war crimes in Gaza again, cutting slack to Hamas.

There is much I can write you about what is going here, but I am wondering what I should not write. I will start by imagining that I am you, sitting at home in the Los Angeles area and flipping back and forth between the weather, traffic reports, the Ukraine, Mexican illegals and Gaza. No […]

Should Jews in Europe take more responsibility in self-defense of community and property?

It is time for a total military siege on Gaza; Nothing should enter the Gaza Strip.

Germany’s The Jewish Faith newspaper ominously noted, “We Jews are in for a war after the war.”

The truth is we seldom explore with kids what prayer is supposed to be about.

Almost as one, Jews around the world are acknowledging the day-to-day peril facing ordinary Jews in Israel and the extraordinary service of the IDF in protecting them.

So on the one hand Secretary Kerry makes no bones about who is at fault for the current hostilities: he clearly blames Hamas.

King Solomon said it long ago: “Cast your bread upon the waters” because you don’t know when you’ll hit something. Our job is to do.

The anti-Israel camp does not need to win America fully to its side. Merely to neutralize it would radically alter the balance of power and put Israel in great jeopardy.

More Articles from Louis Rene Beres
Louis Rene Beres

President Obama’s core argument on a Middle East peace process is still founded on incorrect assumptions.

Louis Rene Beres

Once upon a time in America, every adult could recite at least some Spenglerian theory of decline.

President Obama’s core argument is still founded on incorrect assumptions.

Specific strategic lessons from the Bar Kokhba rebellion.

Still facing an effectively unhindered nuclear threat from Iran, Israel will soon need to choose between two strategic options.

For states, as for individuals, fear and reality go together naturally.

So much of the struggle between Israel and the Arabs continues to concern space.

An undifferentiated or across-the-board commitment to nuclear ambiguity could prove harmful to Israel’s’s overall security.

    Latest Poll

    Do you think the FAA ban on US flights to Israel is political?






    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/louis-bene-beres/after-fatah-hamas-reconciliation-the-endless-futility-of-israels-peace-process-conclusion/2011/08/10/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: