web analytics
May 26, 2013 /17 Sivan, 5773
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
The Tosfos Yomtov was convinced that the death of 300,000 –600,000 Jews during the Chmielnicki massacres of 1648-49 were because of improper Tefila. Communicated: Tefilla

Chillul Tefila Bifarhesia, as well as halachicly challenged verbiage and dress, are external manifestations of a critical lack of personal yiras shomayim which has lethal consequences.



Kafka In Washington: Deceptive Cartographies And Hidden Meanings


tell a friend
Beres-Louis-Rene

            Many people prowl round Mount Sinai.  Their speech is blurred, either they are garrulous or they shout or they are taciturn.  But none of them comes straight down a broad, newly made, smooth road that does its own part in making one’s strides long and swifter.

Franz Kafka, Mount Sinai

 

             Gershom Scholem, a noted authority on the Kabbalah even before it was made fashionable by Madonna, associated Kafka with the “light of the canonical,” a rare quality of special texts that compels examination and reflection.  Focusing this light in very brief parables  - a genre in which he deployed image and motif with the strictest possible economy of language  - Kafka forces the reader to unravel mystery in order to understand.  A  “heretical Kabbalist,” as Scholem once called him, Kafka essentially gives us a unique secular representation of the sacred world.

 

            These encrypted messages can be decoded in various ways. Today, they can be productively deciphered from the critical standpoint of Israel’s stance before the twisted cartographies of Washington’s Road Map” now also known as President Barack Obama’s five-point Mitchell Plan.

 

            We will consider Kafka’s Mount Sinai.  Embedded in this exquisite parable are particular lessons and basic truths.  But it is up to the individual reader, obstructed by very grave difficulty at every turn, to make the necessary effort. Moreover, this effort must be preceded by a meaningful theme, a lucid motif wherein a genuinely useful elucidation may be undertaken.

 

            Let us now make this effort, together. Let us now also determine that our combined energies will be directed toward the “big question” of Israel’s physical survival, a question that I have taken up repeatedly in the pages of The Jewish Press.  Such a no-nonsense question would have pleased Kafka himself.  A keen student of Jewish texts who saw the destructions of the First and Second Temples as a cosmic catastrophe, Kafka, laboring painstakingly in Prague over his meticulously crafted prose, would have been eternally grateful for any opportunity to help preserve a now-reborn Jewish State.

 

            The people, who “prowl round Mount Sinai,” the allegedly emancipated Children of Israel, are deeply afflicted by their wanderings.  Although a “newly made, smooth road” might be followed to the top of the holy mountain, and hence to a much-higher level of emancipation, these people,all of these people, plainly avoid the direct road.  Instead, they remain at the base of the mountain, at the periphery of solemnity, unclear; distressed; sometimes shrill, sometimes silent.  These people, we should not be surprised to learn, will have very great difficulty in making survival choices.

 

            So it is today, with the People of Israel, living in roughly the same bad neighborhood: (1) now with a reconstituted State to protect;  (2) now with a new hostile Arab state called “Palestine” about to be torn crudely from its own still-living body; and (3) now with a surrounding Islamist world that voluptuously embraces a deeply theological anti-Semitism.  Overwhelmed by wrong directions, some of it from Jerusalem (” we will accept a demilitarized Palestinian state,” says the prime minister), some of it from Washington (the Mitchell Plan codifies both old and new expectations of Jewish land for nothing), these battered citizens of a beleaguered State prowl this way and that, tentatively, always round the outer margins of both safety and suffering.

 

            Often confusing rough roads for safe paths and for unsafe paths, they mumble, scream, shout and occasionally become mute. Daily, hourly, minute-by-minute, they search desperately for “clear instructions.”  This time, however, redemptive instructions will not likely come from a burning bush.

 

            Mount Sinai is not in Washington. Large portions of the Arab/Islamic world remain expressly committed to a new genocide for the Jews, at least to a Final Solution for the “Israel question.” Ironically, President Obama, in defiance of all binding obligations under authoritative international law, and of our own American political traditions, now implements new and improved ways of training and protecting the prospective genociders.

 

             Proudly, United States military forces continue to train Fatah “security” personnel, in reality, the grotesque vanguard of future anti-American terrorism. The Road Map, thus drawn more outrageously from the theater of the absurd than from any comprehensible diplomacy, emerges as just the newest international mantra for Israel’s annihilation.

 

            Kafka would have understood. He would not have approved, to be sure, but he would have understood. Sinai is still our sacred mountain.

 

             How, precisely, shall Israelis now attempt a climb to its summit? “Show restraint, compromise,” say some of them, even after the latest bomb or rocket of screws, bolts, razor blades and rat poison explodes upon Jewish children. “Commit more fully to the Road Map,” say those prominent journalists who loathe history and who insistently revere the senseless.  “Climb slowly,” and with “good will gestures,” say some of the taciturn academics, for they remain unshaken in their conviction that any real intelligence and courage must always be a personal liability.

 

            Alarmingly, none of these roads is a smooth one and none is capable of making one’s strides  “long and swifter.” Where, then, shall Israel find this road, the shorter and surer path to the top of the mountain?  It exists, to a point, but it is far from the route favored by Washington and by the blurred, garrulous, shouting and taciturn people.

 

             Constructed by those who still remember the true meanings of “civilization,” it is discoverable not by the Many (nothing important is ever discoverable by the Many), but only by the Few. Aware that smooth roads can be artfully rocky, and that seemingly smooth roads are often treacherous, this Few still hold the most hidden and therefore the most vital messages of Sinai.

 

            Look beyond the crowd, beyond “experts,” beyond the politicians, beyond journalists, beyond geography, beyond maps. Look in secret places, look where no one else is looking, look even where looking is forbidden.

 

             Look to some roads “newly made” and even to some roads not yet even imagined. Look not for ease or painlessness, but rather for destination and access.  Look not to Washington, but to Sinai’s original voice.

 

            Sinai’s summit, a convenient metaphor for Israel’s enduring survival, is accessible only to those who will heed this complex injunction.  Detached from those persistent policies that are inherently rooted in error, alert climbers must now consider roadways that are harder to identify or that might even still need to be built.  Although there are certainly no guarantees that freer minds will see clearly, it is certain that unfree minds will never bring us to the mountain’s summit.

 

            Sinai’s summit is blocked by enemy armies and armaments, and by relentless enemy convictions that will never bow to reason or negotiation.  To reach this blocked summit, those who prowl round the base of the mountain will inevitably have to contend, intermittently, with increasingly formidable obstructions, even preparing, if necessary, for protracted war and incessant terror. Because these enemy armies and armaments might ultimately reach a level that could forever prevent successful ascent upon the mountain, Israel will, from time to time, still have to use force purposefully.

 

             Israel will sometimes have to strike enemy positions first. It might even have to respond to certain enemy first strikes with overwhelmingly destructive reprisals. Importantly, it will also have to let both state and non-state enemies know this defensive and retributive plan in advance. After all, the Lex Talionis, the law of exact retaliation, was born upon this very mountain.

 

            Most perplexing of all, and most difficult to accept, will be a final awareness that Sinai’s summit can never be fully accessible, that all roads, even the best among them, will be temporary, and that the “smooth road,” while indispensable, will also remain, always, only partially navigable.

 

LOUIS RENÉ BERES, the author of many books on international relations and international law, was educated at Princeton (Ph.D., 1971).  His work on security matters is well-known to Israel’s political, military, academic and intelligence communities. Professor Beres was born in Zurich on August 31, 1945, the son of Austrian Jewish refugees in Switzerland. He is Strategic and Military Affairs columnist for The Jewish Press.

tell a friend

About the Author: Louis René Beres, strategic and military affairs columnist for The Jewish Press, is professor of Political Science at Purdue University. Educated at Princeton (Ph.D., 1971), he lectures and publishes widely on international relations and international law and is the author of ten major books in the field. In Israel, Professor Beres was chair of Project Daniel.


You might also be interested in:


no comments

You must log in to post a comment.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Sayed Nasrallah Speech
Nasrallah Vowing to Sustain Assad’s Regime (Dubbed Video)
Latest Indepth Stories
Al-Dura_Postage_Stamp

France 2 and Enderlin must have their press accreditation revoked and be thrown out of Israel.

Palestinian kindergarten children enacting a military operation.

Slaughter is a routine, widespread practice among many Moslem families.

Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas has said he will never recognize a Jewish state and there will be no Jews allowed in a Palestinian State.

parently an affront to J Street’s worldview, the focus of which appears to be the creation of a Palestinian State, whether or not that will bring peace.

Member of Knesset Moshe Feiglin (Likud).

The importance of the caucus on organ harvesting in China, sponsored recently by the Liberal Lobby in the Knesset, cannot be exaggerated.

My mother, the eldest daughter of Reb Yaakov Kamenetsky, zt”l, was niftar last month at the age of 92. She took her last breath in her home in Efrat, Israel, next door to the shul that was my father’s for 24 years before his passing in 2007.

Following the Boston Marathon bombing, one crucial point will likely remain overlooked. The most loathsome aspect of this or any other terror bombing attack on civilians will always lie in the inexpressibility of physical pain. While all decent people will abhor the idea of bombs expressly directed at the innocent, whether here or in other countries, none will ever be able to process the very deepest horrors of what has been inflicted.

It’s only natural to see increasing evidence of Jerusalem’s glorious Jewish past being unearthed, quite literally, under modern Israeli sovereignty. The new archaeological finds are also very timely – as the Arab onslaught attempting to detach Jerusalem from its Jewish roots gains steam, the facts on the ground, or “under” the ground, show quite otherwise.

The Talmud (Berachot 26b) says, “tefillot avot tiknum” – “prayer was established by the avot.” The Talmud then uses the following verse (Bereshit 19:27) to prove how Avraham established prayer: “Vayaskem Avraham baboker el hamakom asher amad sham et pnei Hashem” – “And Avraham got up early in the morning to the place where he had stood before God.”

Nearly 13 years ago, then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak journeyed to Camp David to end the conflict with the Palestinians. With the approval of President Clinton, he offered Yasir Arafat an independent Palestinian state in almost all of the West Bank, Gaza and in part of Jerusalem. Arafat said no.

The news that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative groups has brought renewed spotlight on a 2010 lawsuit filed by the pro-Israel group Z Street, which alleges it was also singled out by the IRS when applying for tax-exempt status.

In an editorial last week (“Circling the Wagons”) we noted the efforts by the administration and its supporters to dismiss allegations that the government’s spin on the Benghazi attack was designed to shield the president and that the IRS was improperly used to stifle opposition to Mr. Obama’s reelection.

As the controversies besetting the Obama administration continue to grow in number and intensity, the prospect that President Obama would seriously consider military action against Iran, should that country continue its drive to become a nuclear power, becomes more and more remote. So we welcome the current enhancement of sanctions against Iran on the federal and New York State levels.

To his parents’ friends, he was “Mrs. Greenberg’s disgrace,” but to sports fans he is one of the greatest – if not the greatest – Jewish baseball players of all time. Long before Sandy Koufax, Hank Greenberg excited Jewish sports fans with his prowess on the baseball diamond.

More Articles from Louis Rene Beres
Louis Rene Beres

Following the Boston Marathon bombing, one crucial point will likely remain overlooked. The most loathsome aspect of this or any other terror bombing attack on civilians will always lie in the inexpressibility of physical pain. While all decent people will abhor the idea of bombs expressly directed at the innocent, whether here or in other countries, none will ever be able to process the very deepest horrors of what has been inflicted.

Louis Rene Beres

Everyone who reads newspapers should know at least one thing. Threats to annihilate Israel have always been unremarkable. Almost never, it seems, have Israel’s existential enemies sought any reason for concealment.

In the face of seemingly irrational threats from North Korea, at least one American conclusion should be obvious and prompt: Nuclear strategy is a “game” that sane world leaders must play, whether they like it, or not. President Obama can choose to play this complex game purposefully or inattentively. But, one way or another, he will have to play.

A fundamental inequality is evident in all expressions of the Middle East peace process.

One must presume that President Obama’s most recent calls for Israeli cooperation in the Middle East peace process are balanced, fair, and well-intentioned. Why not? At the same time, unsurprisingly, these all-too-familiar calls are manifestly thin, in the sense that they lack any genuine intellectual content.

Needed changes in Israel’s decision making process have simply not kept up with the growing complexities and synergies of Israel’s always-hostile external environment.

Israel must continue to base its policies toward both Iran and ‘Palestine’ upon an utterly candid and unvarnished awareness of threats to Jewish life.

Under all relevant criteria of international law, Iran’s ongoing stance toward Israel remains unequivocally genocidal.

    Latest Poll

    If you could only choose one of the following scenarios regarding Chareidi IDF service, which would you choose?





    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/louis-bene-beres/kafka-in-washington-deceptive-cartographies-and-hidden-meanings-2/2010/05/12/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online:

Close