web analytics
January 30, 2015 / 10 Shevat, 5775
 
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Pain And Martyrdom In The ‘New Middle East’: Hidden Meanings Of Impending Jihadist Terrorism


Beres-Louis-Rene

              Revolutionary fervor still sweeping the Middle East is plainly ongoing and perilously “contagious.” Above all, perhaps, these eruptions confirm that the so-called “Palestinian Problem” has never been more than a manipulated contrivance of corrupt Arab monarchies and dictatorships, and that Israel has had absolutely nothing to do with the region’s core problems. Indeed, to the contrary, this fervor reveals that if the Arabs had simply embraced rather than demonized Israel from the start – a fully rational and deserved embrace that would have been enthusiastically welcomed by all Israelis – the Arab states would have benefited politically, intellectually, medically, scientifically and materially.

 

            But what is real in world politics is not always rational.  As part of classical strategies of deflection and deception, Arab demonization of Israel, not symbiotic embrace, was de rigueur from the beginning. And now, ironically, in the wake of multiple revolutionary eruptions across the Arab world calling loudly for “democracy,” Islamist forces will quickly surface and expand with a renewed dedication to narrowly theological power and determinedly religious purity. The literally explosive results of this largely unexpected rededication and renewal will be felt not only in the Arab Middle East itself, but also in Israel, Europe and the United States.

 

             In Gaza, al-Qaeda, not to be outdone by newly emergent Muslim Brotherhood elements now coalescing throughout the Hamas-controlled strip, will re-double its own commitment to “sacred” violence. For all Jihadist terrorists, violence and the sacred will remain inseparable.

 

            Oddly, today’s headlines from the “revolutionary” Middle East are sometimes misleading, and generally incomplete. At its core, Jihadist terrorism has little to do with war, politics or resistance to oppression. Rather, the essential meanings of these recurrent excursions into barbarism can be found within personal feelings of fear, dissatisfaction, cowardice and loathing.  More particularly, these include: (1) a consuming, though unrecognized, horror of death  (relieved for “martyrs” by a compelling promise of immortality);  (2) an unfulfilled wish for ecstasy or intense pleasure;  (3) a palpable joy drawn from the targeting of those who “lack sacredness;” and, even more acutely after Mubarak,  (4) an abiding hatred of all “apostates” and  “infidels.”

 

            In searching for the truest meanings of regional revolutionary fervor in the Middle East, the implications for Jihadist terrorism will never be fully discoverable in official declarations, charters and covenants.  Nor will they be made understandable in less formal Islamist diatribes.  Obliquely but profoundly, these deeper meanings will remain hidden in the intense sufferings inflicted by Jihadists upon their past and future victims.

 

            In Egypt, and elsewhere in the volatile region, Jihadist terror will soon re-emerge with a “sacred” vengeance. Seeking to express Shahada, or Death For Allah, the now still-seemingly secular goals of revolutionary terror will create a convenient smokescreen for unalterably religious objectives.

 

            Human language can never describe agony. It follows that the defiling horror of Jihadist terror-violence can never really be understood or felt by others. Expert commentaries notwithstanding, this horror can never be reduced to any tangible, measurable, inventory of casualties.

 

             All agony is incommunicable. In matters of Jihadist terror, quantification must always miss the point.   

 

             Facing a “new Middle East,” the anguish of new terror victims will not only defile language, it will also be language defiling. The sheer inexpressibility of pain, although never determinable by politics, revolution or society, can still have expressible political, revolutionary and societal outcomes. In the case of still-coming Jihadist terrorism, it may even stand in the way of recognizing new Islamist violence as authentically evil or unacceptable. We may even encounter, in this connection, comfortingly romantic celebrations of Jihadist terrorism as the necessary “revolutionary” expression of  freedom-fighters.”

 

            According to certain recent WikiLeaks revelations, the U.S. Department of State had routinely identified the Iranian-backed Hezbollah in precisely such neatly sanitized terms.

 

             To adequately understand the “new Middle East,” especially the long-term consequences of multinational revolution, we will need to look far beyond the agitated but largely futile cries for “democracy.” To begin, we must understand that Jihadist terrorists are spurred on by the distinctly voluptuous and purifying satisfactions of their planned violence.  Islamist suicide-bombers, in particular, prepare carefully for their cathartic missions of pain and extinction because of the anticipated ecstasy.  Drawn from a presumed religious obligation, this ecstasy, which rewards doubly because it is also “cleansing,” represents an almost exact reciprocal of the unendurable suffering that must be borne by the victims. 

 

             For Jihadist suicide terrorists, both past and future, the death that is meted out to “profane” others is only an abstraction.  These victims, by definition, lack sacredness. Moreover, in the unchanging Koranic concept of war, terrorizing the profane unbeliever who refuses to be dhimmi (to accept Shari’a domination) is a desired end unto itself.

 

            Physical pain within the human body can not only destroy ordinary language, it can also bring about a visceral reversion to pre-language human sounds – that is, to those primal moans, cries and whispers that are anterior to learned speech. While the soon-to-be expanding number of victims of Jihadist terror will writhe agonizingly from the burns and the nails and the screws, neither the “civilized” world publics who bear silent witness, nor the “martyrs” themselves, will ever experience what is actually being suffered. 

 

             Physical pain, even in the “new Middle East,” can have no consequential “voice.” When, at last, it may discover some potentially decipherable sound, the listener will no longer want to listen. This audience, after all, mortal and fragile, will wish strenuously to deny its own existential vulnerabilities.  Significantly, such denial, as Freud himself recognized, always lies at the very core of what it means to be human.

 

             Violent upheavals now spreading across the Middle East contain important hidden meanings. For the most part, their principal legacy will have little to do with any sustained popular revolution, democracy, or the overthrow of earthly despotisms. Instead, it will bear upon long latent and much more primal human hopes of achieving the indisputably greatest power of all, power over death.

 

            Drawing upon these important hidden meanings of current revolutionary fervor in the “new” Middle East and North Africa, the essence of any capable counter-terrorist policy must soon begin to lie in the following critical awareness:  Jihadist violence is never rooted in any conveniently fashionable political or revolutionary ideology, but rather in remorselessly vengeful images of irresistible religious obligation.Jihadist terror, as I have written here previously, is always a distinctly sacred form of religious sacrifice. Once this elusive concept can be understood, we will finally be able to deal intelligently and purposefully with emerging hazards of the region.

 


LOUIS RENÉ BERES (Ph.D., Princeton, 1971) lectures and publishes widely on international law and international relations.  He is the author of some of the earliest scholarly books and articles on nuclear war and nuclear terrorism. Professor of Political Science and International Law at Purdue, Dr. Beres was born in Zürich, Switzerland, on August 31, 1945. He is Strategic and Military Affairs columnist for The Jewish Press.

About the Author: Louis René Beres (Ph.D., Princeton, 1971) is professor of political science and international law at Purdue University and the author of many books and articles dealing with international relations and strategic studies.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Pain And Martyrdom In The ‘New Middle East’: Hidden Meanings Of Impending Jihadist Terrorism”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Jeremy Bird, working for Israeli campaign outfit V15, shown at Ted Talk, May 20, 2014.
V15 US Political Operative Marinated in Hate-Israel Activism
Latest Indepth Stories
Eli Weiss

Shepherding in the Shomron isn’t your usual kind of shepherding – despite his business-minded beginnings, Eli has discovered that a strong ideological impetus powers the job.

Resnick-013015-Pilot

I said to myself, “This story has got to be told. We’re losing this generation of World War II and if we don’t listen to them now, we’ve lost it.”

Eller-013015

His entire existence was about spreading simcha and glorifying G-d’s name on a daily basis.

IRAN-US-POLITICS-MILITARY

An Israeli strike could theoretically damage Iran’s nuclear program; only US can terminate program

At some point we need to stop simply defending and promoting Israel and start living in Israel

“We Jews are the only people who when we drop a book on the floor pick it up and kiss it.”

Though Zaide was the publisher of The Jewish Press, a big newspaper,I always remember him learning

Speaker Silver has been an extraordinary public servant since his election to the Assembly in 1975 and has been an exemplary leader of that body since 1994.

He spent the first leg of his daylong visit to the French capital at Hyper Cacher.

Drawing Congress into the Iran nuclear debate is the last thing the White House wants.

Great leaders like Miriam and like Sarah Schenirer possess the capacity to challenge the status quo that confronts them.

Obama’s foreign policy is viewed by both liberals and conservatives as deeply flawed

Many journalists are covertly blaming the Charlie Hebdo writers themselves through self-censorship.

Why does the Times relay different motivations and narratives for jihadists in Europe and Israel?

More Articles from Louis Rene Beres

A “Palestine” could become another Lebanon, with many different factions battling for control.

Louis Rene Beres

President Obama’s core argument on a Middle East peace process is still founded on incorrect assumptions.

Once upon a time in America, every adult could recite at least some Spenglerian theory of decline.

President Obama’s core argument is still founded on incorrect assumptions.

Specific strategic lessons from the Bar Kokhba rebellion.

Still facing an effectively unhindered nuclear threat from Iran, Israel will soon need to choose between two strategic options.

For states, as for individuals, fear and reality go together naturally.

So much of the struggle between Israel and the Arabs continues to concern space.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/louis-bene-beres/pain-and-martyrdom-in-the-new-middle-east-hidden-meanings-of-impending-jihadist-terrorism/2011/03/02/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: