web analytics
July 6, 2015 / 19 Tammuz, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Resurrecting Nonsense: Why There Is Still No ‘Cycle of Violence’ Between Israel and Palestinians


Beres-Louis-Rene

            Back during the presidential election campaign, then-Senator Barack Obama made repeated reference to a “cycle of violence” in the Middle East. Although, thankfully, he no longer uses this particularly inappropriate term in describing ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinians, now President Obama continues to allege a basic symmetry between the warring parties. These disturbing allegations, whether explicit or couched in innuendo, are wrong and troubling. They encourage U.S. policies that can only revive and exacerbate Arab violence.

 

              Before he can hope to make any real progress with plans for peace in the Middle East (and this would mean abandoning, finally, the wholly twisted cartography of the so-called “Road Map“), the president must first understand something very basic about law and justice: There can never be any equivalence between the expressly criminal violence of terrorism and the indispensable law-enforcing resort to counter-terrorism. Instead of worrying about a small number of Jews who seek apartments in their capital city of Israel, Mr. Obama should start worrying about the much large number of Palestinians for whom illegitimate violence remains an integral and ineradicable element of “peacemaking.”

 

            Although not usually plain and explicit, Mr. Obama still seemingly accepts a manifestly crude symmetry between Arab terrorism and Israeli counter-terrorism. This unfortunate and ironic acceptance (ironic, because he simultaneously regards similar insurgent threats against the United States as unambiguously terroristic) belies his announced intent to proffer a fair and honorable approach to the problem. Jurisprudentially, it also has the injurious effect of eroding crucial differences between crime and punishment, between murder and self-defense.

 

             President Obama should now speak far more plainly on this vital issue. Words matter. There is still no cycle of violence in the Palestinian war against Israeli civilians. All Palestinian terror groups (Fatah, Hamas – there is no real difference) argue openly that their killings of noncombatants are in “retaliation” for Israel’s “occupation.”  Even now, both organizations steadfastly refuse to renounce “armed struggle.”

 

            President Obama still presses Israel to make further and far-reaching territorial concessions, urgings that amount to “land for nothing.”  Fatah, in its very latest “Internal Order Document,” states at Article 17:  “The armed popular revolution is the only inevitable way to the liberation of Palestine.” And at Article 19:  “The struggle will not end until the elimination of the Zionist entity and the liberation of Palestine” (emphasis added). Of course, “Palestine” still includes all of Israel.

 

            The Palestine Liberation Organization was founded in 1964, three years before the Israeli “occupation.” What, exactly, was the PLO seeking to liberate from 1964 – 1967? And what about persistent Arab terror from the 1949 armistice until June 1967? During that time, Gaza was held illegally by Egypt and West Bank (Judea/Samaria) by Jordan. What was then the object of Arab (Fedayeen) terror?

 

            More “moderate” Fatah’s present position calls officially for terrorism and genocide.  From the incontestable standpoint of international law, there is no reasonable way that such a stance could ever be judged comparable to Israel’s own firm commitment to oppose terrorism and genocide. To argue otherwise – to suggest openly or even tacitly that there remains a “cycle of violence” in the Middle East – would be tantamount to accepting the following: (1) a duly constituted democratic state, and a criminal terror organization are of equivalent legal stature; and (2) terrorist leaders and defenseless civilians are equally permissible targets.

 

            President Obama should finally clarify that he does not support such an argument.  At a minimum, such clarification would greatly enhance his steadily eroding stature among Israelis.  There are palpably vital differences between criminality and law-enforcement. Why not say so?
             Even if the incessant Palestinian refrain of an Israeli “occupation” were not concocted, and even if the ritualistic claims of “stolen Palestinian land” made any historical or legal sense, there could still never be any legal justification for the deliberate Fatah and Hamas policies of terror and genocide.  Significantly, on these common and unhidden policies, there is not a shred of difference between the two groups.

 

             As long as President Obama continues to pressure Israel to travel the suicidal “Road Map,” Palestinian “suicide” bombers will begin to reemerge with new fervor. These uniquely cowardly terrorists who fight only for their own personal reputations and for their personal immortality (they actually fear death more intensely than ordinary human beings; the “suicide” that they expect to suffer is only a momentary inconvenience on their  “martyr’s” way to “paradise”) will again pack explosives with nails, screws and razor blades dipped in rat poison.

 

            These cowards are not militants. They are not revolutionaries. Their expected “martyrdom” is a desperate way to avoid death. They are therefore murderers.

 

            There is no “cycle of violence” in the Middle East. Terror groups never have any right to “retaliate” under international law – no more so than does an individual criminal in domestic society have any such a right against municipal police authorities. Indisputably, on the basis of their own current statements and platforms, Fatah and Hamas are organizations that recognize absolutely no proper boundaries in the use of force. Such boundaries, however, are always a critical and binding component of humanitarian international law (also known as the Law of War or the Law of Armed Conflict).

 

            What is Israel to do? There is no cycle of violence in the region, only a continuous and fanaticism-driven murder of Israelis on their own land. Left unchallenged by correct naming from Washington, this Jihad or coming war of extermination against Israel will also leave America unprepared for future attacks by new waves of Islamist suicide bombers. Such attacks are already being prepared, primarily in Gaza – where Hamas is now building new ties with al-Qaeda – and are ultimately likely to involve chemical, biological or even nuclear materials. Significantly, in this connection, Mr. Obama’s newly signed follow-on START agreement with Russia will be of no recognizable deterrent or preventive value.

 

            There has never been a cycle of violence in the Middle East. For President Barack Obama, it is time to say so plainly, and to finally stop alleging any kind of equivalence between relentless Arab terror and unavoidable Israeli counter-terror.

 


LOUIS RENÉ BERES, Professor of International Law at Purdue, was educated at Princeton (Ph.D., 1971), and publishes widely on terrorism and international law. He is author of many of the earliest major books dealing with nuclear war and nuclear terrorism, and also with Israel’s nuclear strategy. Professor Beres, who was Chair of Project Daniel,  is Strategic and Military Affairs columnist for The Jewish Press.

About the Author: Louis René Beres (Ph.D., Princeton, 1971) is professor of political science and international law at Purdue University and the author of many books and articles dealing with international relations and strategic studies.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Resurrecting Nonsense: Why There Is Still No ‘Cycle of Violence’ Between Israel and Palestinians”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Rings with Islamic State slogans on them.
Shin Bet Foils ISIS Terror Cell in Negev Bedouin Town
Latest Indepth Stories
President Obama

Sources say seemingly irreconcilable differences between the 2 main parties, Washington and Tehran.

Seder at the White House. The one without the kippa is President Obama.

Instead of accepting reality, the President is trying to hold on to an illusion.

peace in our time iran

Those who suggest further capitulation to Iran are wrongly harming the interests of the West.

Haneen Zoabi (L) and Basel Ghattas (R), Arab members of Israel's parliament, both participated in flotillas attempting to break Israel's legal naval blockade of the Gaza strip.

Few Arab Israelis found anything positive in the decision of its MKS to join any Gaza flotilla.

US Jews prefer to be like their non-Jewish liberal friends complaining about “settlements” and Bibi

New Israel Fund & its supporters must be countered; Israel’s in the midst of an unprecedented storm

PM Netanyahu this week identified ISIS and Iran as Israel’s primary threat. It is a planetary threat that carries the promise of peace.

Haym Solomon, overlooked hero of the Revolutionary War, was America’s “Funding Father.”

Latvia, July 4, 1941 they forced many Jews in the shul putting it on fire; everyone was burned alive

There’s blood on the reporters’ hands AND New Israel Fund for funding groups feeding lies to the UN

Respect & appreciation for our country is not only a civic value but an essential Jewish one as well

When words lose meaning, the world becomes an Orwellian dystopia; a veritable Tower of Babel

Israel, like the non-radical Islamic world. will be happy see the ISIS beheaded for once.

Kids shouldn’t have “uninstructed” Internet access, better to train them how to use it responsibly

What if years from now, IS were to control substantial territory? What world havoc would that wreak?

Rambam writes the verse’s double term refers to 2 messiahs: first King David; 2nd the final Mashiach

More Articles from Louis Rene Beres

A “Palestine” could become another Lebanon, with many different factions battling for control.

Louis Rene Beres

President Obama’s core argument on a Middle East peace process is still founded on incorrect assumptions.

Once upon a time in America, every adult could recite at least some Spenglerian theory of decline.

President Obama’s core argument is still founded on incorrect assumptions.

Specific strategic lessons from the Bar Kokhba rebellion.

Still facing an effectively unhindered nuclear threat from Iran, Israel will soon need to choose between two strategic options.

For states, as for individuals, fear and reality go together naturally.

So much of the struggle between Israel and the Arabs continues to concern space.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/louis-bene-beres/resurrecting-nonsense-why-there-is-still-no-cycle-of-violence-between-israel-and-palestinians-2/2010/06/02/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: