web analytics
September 19, 2014 / 24 Elul, 5774
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Apartment 758x530 Africa-Israel at the Israel Real Estate Exhibition in New York

Africa Israel Residences, part of the Africa Israel Investments Group led by international businessman Lev Leviev, will present 7 leading projects on the The Israel Real Estate Exhibition in New York on Sep 14-15, 2014.



Home » InDepth » Columns »

The Likud’s Shimon Peres

            Here is the simplest way to describe what happened in Israel’s election: the Right won and the Likud lost.

 

The Right’s clear win is not surprising. Ehud Olmert provided Israel’s citizens with all the incentive they needed to vote for the Right. But the greatest surprise is without doubt the Likud’s searing defeat.

 

It takes extraordinary talent to take the ruling party of the national camp from its height of nearly 40 Knesset mandates at the beginning of December – leading the collapsing Kadima by 15 mandates (all figures based on the Uzit average of pre-election weekly polls) – and to lose to Kadima just two months later.

 

True, it seems that Benjamin Netanyahu has a reasonable chance to form a coalition. But even if he succeeds, and I am far from sure of that, it will be a short-term national paralysis government – at best. Even when Netanyahu had scored a clear victory over the Left in the past, he did not know how to translate this majority into concrete policy changes that would steer Israel on a steady, nationalist course. Now that the Likud has lost and Netanyahu’s power is dependant on Avigdor Lieberman, it is highly unlikely that Netanyahu will be able to lead Israel to make the changes vital to Israel’s survival.

 

The other possibility is, of course, a national unity government. I have written many times that a national unity government essentially creates a monopoly of ideas, neutralizing the voters’ choice. When corporations do that for money it is called a cartel, and their directors go to jail. When politicians do it for power it is called “unity,” and they go to the prime ministerial residence.

 

But even if we momentarily ignore the problematic nature of all unity governments, it is clear that in the best case, this government would be paralyzed. It would be unable to negate the Oslo rationale of retreat and destruction when Oslo’s inventors and proponents would be the bulwark of the government.

 

The solid nationalist Jewish majority in Israel has lost its ability to rule. That is due in large part because it did not have the wisdom to establish a clear, Jewish alternative to the anti-Jewish agenda of the Left. But in this election, the fundamental problem has taken on a new political expression. While the Jewish majority grew even more, its ruling party lost.

 

It is not complicated to analyze the reasons for the Likud defeat. The graph of the polls shows exactly where the Likud began to lose ground. Leaving that issue aside for now, the simple fact is that this is the third straight loss for the Likud under Netanyahu’s leadership.

 

In the 1999 elections, the Likud under Netanyahu plunged from 32 to 19 mandates. Six years later, the Likud under Netanyahu nosedived from 38 mandates to just 12. And now, despite wall-to-wall predictions of a clear victory for the Likud, Netanyahu has led the party to defeat at the hands of Kadima.

 

The first defeat could possibly be explained due to extreme media bias against Netanyahu. The second defeat could possibly be explained due to Ariel Sharon having just created the Kadima party. But this third defeat has no explanation – other than Netanyahu himself. In fact, the only time that Netanyahu ever won an election was against Shimon Peres. Now it seems that the ruling party and leadership tool of the national camp has gotten stuck with a “Shimon Peres” of its very own.

 

This is not just the Likud’s problem or an intra-party question. It is a question of the Jewish majority’s ability to shake off the Oslo mentality, lead the nation on a Jewish path, and save Israel from the agony of the autoimmune plague that we know as Oslo.


                                                            ***

 

Manhigut Yehudit Dinners

 

This year Manhigut Yehudit scheduled two annual dinners, one in New York and the other in Jerusalem. The March 1 dinner in Jerusalem (the first ever in Israel) took place at the Ramada Hotel. The New York dinner – our 7th annual such event – will be held at the Sands of Atlantic Beach on Wednesday, March 11.

 

We welcome your participation in these dinners either in person, or by sending in an ad for our special Journal Book. These dinners are a mustfor our organization, as they are the onlyfundraising events of the year and they determine the level of activity for the coming year.

 

Like the dinner in Israel, I will be joined as guest speaker at the New York dinner by my Manhigut co-founder Shmuel Sackett. Come watch our original film, “Campaign 2008″ – the Likud primary from beginning to end, with amazing media clips and behind-the-scenes footage. For information and reservations, please call 516-295-3222.

About the Author: Moshe Feiglin is the Deputy Speaker of the Knesset and a member of Israel's Security and Defense Committee. He heads the Manhigut Yehudit ("Jewish Leadership") faction of Israel's governing Likud party. He is the founder of Manhigut Yehudit and Zo Artzeinu and the author of two books: "Where There Are No Men" and "War of Dreams." Feiglin served in the IDF as an officer in Combat Engineering and is a veteran of the Lebanon War. He lives in Ginot Shomron with his family.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “The Likud’s Shimon Peres”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
A US Air Force (USAF) F-15E Strike Eagle aircraft in flight.
Senate Approves ‘ISIS Bill’ – US Military Hopes for More
Latest Indepth Stories
IDF lone soldier and  David Menachem Gordon (z"l).

Why has his death been treated by some as an invitation for an emotional “autopsy”?

Starck-091914

SWOT analysis: Assessing resources, internal Strengths&Weaknesses; external Opportunities&Threats.

Kohn-091914

Strategy? For the longest time Obama couldn’t be bothered to have one against a sworn enemy.

Miller-091914

Seventeen visual skills are needed for success in school, sports, and everyday life.

We started The Jewish Press. Arnie was an integral part of the paper.

Fear alone is substantial; without fusing it to beauty, fear doesn’t reach its highest potential.

Fortunate are we to have Rosh Hashanah for repentance, a shofar to awaken heavenly mercy.

Arab leaders who want the US to stop Islamic State are afraid of being dubbed traitors and US agents

National Lawyers Guild:Sworn enemy of Israel & the legal arm of Palestinian terrorism since the ’70s

A little less than 10 percent of eligible Democratic voters came out on primary day, which translates into Mr. Cuomo having received the support of 6.2 percent of registered Democrats.

The reality, though, is that the Israeli “war crimes” scenario will likely be played out among highly partisan UN agencies, NGOs, and perhaps even the International Criminal Court.

Peace or the lack of it between Israel and the Palestinians matters not one whit when it comes to the long-term agenda of ISIS and other Islamists, nor does it affect any of the long-running inter-Arab conflicts and wars.

Rather than serving as a deterrent against terrorist attacks, Israel’s military strength and capabilities are instead looked at as an unfair advantage in the asymmetrical war in which it finds itself.

Sisi:”The religious nature of the Middle East creates challenges for the governing authorities.”

More Articles from Moshe Feiglin
MK Moshe-Feiglin

We did not win the war in Gaza because we are still captive to the concept of the 2 state solution.

9/11 attack on Twin Towers: Will Obama use next week's anniversary as a platform to attack the Assad regime?

Trapped in a false notion of power, America will lose the battle in the same way Israel now loses.

Israel is our land, not theirs – Gaza included. No talk of the 2state solution; 1 state for 1 people

If this is how we play the game, we will lose. By that I mean we will lose everything.

We take US “aid” for psychological reasons-if we have an allowance, that means we have a father.

All the tactical problems have solutions. The real problem is not with the enemy; it is with us.

Why couldn’t the artillery barrage have been implemented before the soldiers went into that hell?

The Gazan octopus arm is a test case, as the rest of the arms are closely watching it.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/the-likuds-shimon-peres/2009/03/04/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: