web analytics
May 19, 2013 /10 Sivan, 5773
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
jumping Following a Passion for Sports to Israel

In Israel, a new five month scholarship program being offered to young aspiring athletes – one of them could be you.



Home » InDepth » Columns »

The Likud’s Shimon Peres

tell a friend

            Here is the simplest way to describe what happened in Israel’s election: the Right won and the Likud lost.

 

The Right’s clear win is not surprising. Ehud Olmert provided Israel’s citizens with all the incentive they needed to vote for the Right. But the greatest surprise is without doubt the Likud’s searing defeat.

 

It takes extraordinary talent to take the ruling party of the national camp from its height of nearly 40 Knesset mandates at the beginning of December – leading the collapsing Kadima by 15 mandates (all figures based on the Uzit average of pre-election weekly polls) – and to lose to Kadima just two months later.

 

True, it seems that Benjamin Netanyahu has a reasonable chance to form a coalition. But even if he succeeds, and I am far from sure of that, it will be a short-term national paralysis government – at best. Even when Netanyahu had scored a clear victory over the Left in the past, he did not know how to translate this majority into concrete policy changes that would steer Israel on a steady, nationalist course. Now that the Likud has lost and Netanyahu’s power is dependant on Avigdor Lieberman, it is highly unlikely that Netanyahu will be able to lead Israel to make the changes vital to Israel’s survival.

 

The other possibility is, of course, a national unity government. I have written many times that a national unity government essentially creates a monopoly of ideas, neutralizing the voters’ choice. When corporations do that for money it is called a cartel, and their directors go to jail. When politicians do it for power it is called “unity,” and they go to the prime ministerial residence.

 

But even if we momentarily ignore the problematic nature of all unity governments, it is clear that in the best case, this government would be paralyzed. It would be unable to negate the Oslo rationale of retreat and destruction when Oslo’s inventors and proponents would be the bulwark of the government.

 

The solid nationalist Jewish majority in Israel has lost its ability to rule. That is due in large part because it did not have the wisdom to establish a clear, Jewish alternative to the anti-Jewish agenda of the Left. But in this election, the fundamental problem has taken on a new political expression. While the Jewish majority grew even more, its ruling party lost.

 

It is not complicated to analyze the reasons for the Likud defeat. The graph of the polls shows exactly where the Likud began to lose ground. Leaving that issue aside for now, the simple fact is that this is the third straight loss for the Likud under Netanyahu’s leadership.

 

In the 1999 elections, the Likud under Netanyahu plunged from 32 to 19 mandates. Six years later, the Likud under Netanyahu nosedived from 38 mandates to just 12. And now, despite wall-to-wall predictions of a clear victory for the Likud, Netanyahu has led the party to defeat at the hands of Kadima.

 

The first defeat could possibly be explained due to extreme media bias against Netanyahu. The second defeat could possibly be explained due to Ariel Sharon having just created the Kadima party. But this third defeat has no explanation – other than Netanyahu himself. In fact, the only time that Netanyahu ever won an election was against Shimon Peres. Now it seems that the ruling party and leadership tool of the national camp has gotten stuck with a “Shimon Peres” of its very own.

 

This is not just the Likud’s problem or an intra-party question. It is a question of the Jewish majority’s ability to shake off the Oslo mentality, lead the nation on a Jewish path, and save Israel from the agony of the autoimmune plague that we know as Oslo.


                                                            ***

 

Manhigut Yehudit Dinners

 

This year Manhigut Yehudit scheduled two annual dinners, one in New York and the other in Jerusalem. The March 1 dinner in Jerusalem (the first ever in Israel) took place at the Ramada Hotel. The New York dinner – our 7th annual such event – will be held at the Sands of Atlantic Beach on Wednesday, March 11.

 

We welcome your participation in these dinners either in person, or by sending in an ad for our special Journal Book. These dinners are a mustfor our organization, as they are the onlyfundraising events of the year and they determine the level of activity for the coming year.

 

Like the dinner in Israel, I will be joined as guest speaker at the New York dinner by my Manhigut co-founder Shmuel Sackett. Come watch our original film, “Campaign 2008″ – the Likud primary from beginning to end, with amazing media clips and behind-the-scenes footage. For information and reservations, please call 516-295-3222.

tell a friend

About the Author:


You might also be interested in:


no comments

You must log in to post a comment.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Arab rioters hurling rocks at Israeli soldiers during clashes in the village of Aboud, near Ramallah, March 8, 2013.
IDF Latest Response to Arab Riots: ‘Nerf’ Bullets
Latest Indepth Stories
William Dodd, the United States ambassador to Germany, in 1934.

The growing revelations that the Obama State Department watered down public statements on the attack in order to cleanse them of any mention of al Qaeda and terrorism is a travesty.

Secretary of State John Kerry shaking hands with Egyptian President Morsi. The Obama administration cannot even get itself to even use the word “Islamism,” let alone take a stand against the pervasive antisemitism created by Islamists at home and abroad.

We must confront Islamist groups with what Prime Minister David Cameron referred to as “muscular liberalism.”

Egyptian-born cleric Sheikh Yussef al-Qaradawi

Al-Qaradawi’s visit and statements also serve as a reminder that the Israeli-Arab conflict is centered, more than ever, around religion.

Louis Rene Beres

Everyone who reads newspapers should know at least one thing. Threats to annihilate Israel have always been unremarkable. Almost never, it seems, have Israel’s existential enemies sought any reason for concealment.

Mark Treyger, a candidate for city council in New York City’s 47th council district, met recently with the editorial board of The Jewish Press at the newspaper’s Boro Park office.

Israel’s government did not want to liberate Jerusalem. Or to be more specific, the Labor and National Religious Party ministers did not want to liberate Jerusalem. “Who needs that whole Vatican?” Defense Minister Moshe Dayan explained at the time.

Last Friday, the Western Wall underwent an unwelcome transformation from sacred site to media circus as the group known as the Women of the Wall sought to hold a decidedly non-traditional prayer service.

Two recent revelations have raised serious questions about the kind of government President Obama is running.

Readers of my monthly Baseball Insider column may have noticed its absence last week (the column appears in the second issue of every month). The reason for that is I have something more serious and personal to share with you, something that didn’t seem appropriate for a baseball column.

Herbert Romerstein died last week after a long illness. With Herb’s passing, we lose not only a good guy but a vast reservoir of knowledge that is not replaceable.

Freedom House recently released its annual report on press freedom throughout the world at an event sponsored by the Newseum in Washington. But along with the usual and appropriate condemnations of dictatorships and totalitarian states, the group decided to slam the one democracy in the Middle East as well as one of the few states in the region where press freedom actually exists: Israel.

What is the relationship between Pesach and Shavuos?
Rabbi Naftali Jaeger, rosh yeshiva of Sh’or Yoshuv, relates in the name of the Ishbitzer Rebbe a striking metaphor:

Now is the time for Ankara to take some corrective domestic and foreign policy measures consistent with what the country has and continues to aspire for but fails to realize.

Even Muslim Brotherhood think-tanks have said that the Shia, and especially Iran, are more dangerous threats than is Israel.

More Articles from Moshe Feiglin
Moshe-Feiglin-022213

Israel’s government did not want to liberate Jerusalem. Or to be more specific, the Labor and National Religious Party ministers did not want to liberate Jerusalem. “Who needs that whole Vatican?” Defense Minister Moshe Dayan explained at the time.

Member of Knesset Moshe Feiglin (Likud).

Netanyahu made an invaluable turnabout in the way Israel explains itself. We must complete that turnabout. We must not go half way.

The following is my response to a woman who criticized me for visiting the Temple Mount. In a letter to me, she claimed that I broke the law and irresponsibly provoked Arab anger. She suggested that my actions should conform to the will of the “majority.”

It is always easiest to blame the rest of the world and not to make an accounting of your own ideology.

Why throw years of friendly cooperation into the trashcan?

The struggle for Israeli sovereignty on the Temple Mount symbolizes humanity’s struggle in the transition from enslavement to liberty.

Do you really think that retreat from the very foundations of our lives will bring us quiet?

It is unthinkable that Israelis should look at Jonathan through American eyes.

    Latest Poll

    Which is the most beautiful location in Jerusalem?









    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/the-likuds-shimon-peres/2009/03/04/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online:

Close