web analytics
November 24, 2014 / 2 Kislev, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
IDC Herzliya Campus A Day on Campus

To mark IDC Herzliya’s 20th anniversary, we spent a day following Prof. Uriel Reichman, IDC’s founder and president, and Jonathan Davis, VP for External Relations, around its delightful campus.



Home » InDepth » Columns »

The Likud’s Shimon Peres

            Here is the simplest way to describe what happened in Israel’s election: the Right won and the Likud lost.

 

The Right’s clear win is not surprising. Ehud Olmert provided Israel’s citizens with all the incentive they needed to vote for the Right. But the greatest surprise is without doubt the Likud’s searing defeat.

 

It takes extraordinary talent to take the ruling party of the national camp from its height of nearly 40 Knesset mandates at the beginning of December – leading the collapsing Kadima by 15 mandates (all figures based on the Uzit average of pre-election weekly polls) – and to lose to Kadima just two months later.

 

True, it seems that Benjamin Netanyahu has a reasonable chance to form a coalition. But even if he succeeds, and I am far from sure of that, it will be a short-term national paralysis government – at best. Even when Netanyahu had scored a clear victory over the Left in the past, he did not know how to translate this majority into concrete policy changes that would steer Israel on a steady, nationalist course. Now that the Likud has lost and Netanyahu’s power is dependant on Avigdor Lieberman, it is highly unlikely that Netanyahu will be able to lead Israel to make the changes vital to Israel’s survival.

 

The other possibility is, of course, a national unity government. I have written many times that a national unity government essentially creates a monopoly of ideas, neutralizing the voters’ choice. When corporations do that for money it is called a cartel, and their directors go to jail. When politicians do it for power it is called “unity,” and they go to the prime ministerial residence.

 

But even if we momentarily ignore the problematic nature of all unity governments, it is clear that in the best case, this government would be paralyzed. It would be unable to negate the Oslo rationale of retreat and destruction when Oslo’s inventors and proponents would be the bulwark of the government.

 

The solid nationalist Jewish majority in Israel has lost its ability to rule. That is due in large part because it did not have the wisdom to establish a clear, Jewish alternative to the anti-Jewish agenda of the Left. But in this election, the fundamental problem has taken on a new political expression. While the Jewish majority grew even more, its ruling party lost.

 

It is not complicated to analyze the reasons for the Likud defeat. The graph of the polls shows exactly where the Likud began to lose ground. Leaving that issue aside for now, the simple fact is that this is the third straight loss for the Likud under Netanyahu’s leadership.

 

In the 1999 elections, the Likud under Netanyahu plunged from 32 to 19 mandates. Six years later, the Likud under Netanyahu nosedived from 38 mandates to just 12. And now, despite wall-to-wall predictions of a clear victory for the Likud, Netanyahu has led the party to defeat at the hands of Kadima.

 

The first defeat could possibly be explained due to extreme media bias against Netanyahu. The second defeat could possibly be explained due to Ariel Sharon having just created the Kadima party. But this third defeat has no explanation – other than Netanyahu himself. In fact, the only time that Netanyahu ever won an election was against Shimon Peres. Now it seems that the ruling party and leadership tool of the national camp has gotten stuck with a “Shimon Peres” of its very own.

 

This is not just the Likud’s problem or an intra-party question. It is a question of the Jewish majority’s ability to shake off the Oslo mentality, lead the nation on a Jewish path, and save Israel from the agony of the autoimmune plague that we know as Oslo.


                                                            ***

 

Manhigut Yehudit Dinners

 

This year Manhigut Yehudit scheduled two annual dinners, one in New York and the other in Jerusalem. The March 1 dinner in Jerusalem (the first ever in Israel) took place at the Ramada Hotel. The New York dinner – our 7th annual such event – will be held at the Sands of Atlantic Beach on Wednesday, March 11.

 

We welcome your participation in these dinners either in person, or by sending in an ad for our special Journal Book. These dinners are a mustfor our organization, as they are the onlyfundraising events of the year and they determine the level of activity for the coming year.

 

Like the dinner in Israel, I will be joined as guest speaker at the New York dinner by my Manhigut co-founder Shmuel Sackett. Come watch our original film, “Campaign 2008″ – the Likud primary from beginning to end, with amazing media clips and behind-the-scenes footage. For information and reservations, please call 516-295-3222.

About the Author: Moshe Feiglin is the Deputy Speaker of the Knesset and a member of Israel's Security and Defense Committee. He heads the Manhigut Yehudit ("Jewish Leadership") faction of Israel's governing Likud party. He is the founder of Manhigut Yehudit and Zo Artzeinu and the author of two books: "Where There Are No Men" and "War of Dreams." Feiglin served in the IDF as an officer in Combat Engineering and is a veteran of the Lebanon War. He lives in Ginot Shomron with his family.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “The Likud’s Shimon Peres”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Banner at Tehran military parade, Sept. 23, 2013. Although the English statement is relatively mild, in Persian and Arabic it says “Death to America.”
Iran Says Nuclear Deal ‘Impossible’ by Nov. 24 Deadline
Latest Indepth Stories
Jo-map

As Arabs murder and maim Jews, Jordan’s leaders bark the blood libel of “Israeli aggression.”

bulb

Perhaps attacking a terrorist’s legacy broadly and publicly would dissuade others from terrorism?

Medics evacuate the dead and injured after attack on Har Nof synagogue Tuesday morning.

R’ Aryeh yelled “Run, I’ll fight!” Using a chair against terrorists to buy time so others could flee

Kfar Kana Riots

Riot started when Muslim students wore the Pal. kaffiyeh and Druze students demanded them removed

The “Media” didn’t want us to know what a kind, giving, loving young woman Dalia was.

A “Palestine” could become another Lebanon, with many different factions battling for control.

Maimonides himself walked and prayed in the permissible areas when he visited Eretz Yisrael in 1165

Having a strong community presence at the polls shows our elected officials we care about the issues

Israel’s Temple Mount policy prefers to blames the Jews-not the attackers-for the crisis.

When Islam conquered the Holy Land, it made its capital in Ramle of all places, not in Jerusalem.

I joined the large crowd but this time it was more personal; my cousin Aryeh was one of the victims.

Terrorists aren’t driven by social, economic, or other grievances, rather by a fanatical worldview.

The phrase that the “Arabs are resorting to violence” is disgraceful and blames the victim.

Tuesday, Yom Shlishi, a doubly good day in the Torah, Esav’s hands tried to silence Yaakov’s voice.

Because of the disparate nature of the perpetrators, who are also relatively young, and given the lack of more traditional targets and the reverence Palestinians have for their homes, one now hears talk of Israel returning to a policy of destroying the houses of terrorists’ families.

More Articles from Moshe Feiglin
MK Moshe-Feiglin

Israel’s Temple Mount policy prefers to blames the Jews-not the attackers-for the crisis.

MK Moshe-Feiglin

If Hamas is ISIS, the world asks, why didn’t Israel destroy it given justification and opportunity?

What is the solution? We must declare, and believe, that the Land of Israel is truly ours and once again build in Judea and Samaria.

During the First Lebanon War, the IDF forced the PLO terrorists all the way to the Beirut port and then to Tunisia. The PLO, which had lost its stronghold in Lebanon, was shattered. Salach Taamri, the most senior and admired terrorist captured by the IDF, was imprisoned in the Ansar detention camp. He was a broken man.

Soldiers at various hospitals complained that they experienced hostility from Arab hospital staff.

A murderous uprising is taking place in Israel; On the roads, In the mixed Jewish-Arab cities.

We did not win the war in Gaza because we are still captive to the concept of the 2 state solution.

Trapped in a false notion of power, America will lose the battle in the same way Israel now loses.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/the-likuds-shimon-peres/2009/03/04/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: