web analytics
May 27, 2015 / 9 Sivan, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Home » InDepth » Columns »

Your Tax Dollars At Work… In Gaza

The United States government may be sinking deeper into debt than at any time in recorded history, but that hasn’t stopped President Obama from reaching down into the pockets of American taxpayers and grabbing some more funds to hand over to the Palestinians.
 
On June 9, with Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas at his side, Obama announced his latest spending spree, which will see hundreds of millions of hard-earned American tax dollars going straight into the coffers of the Palestinians.
 
After reiterating to reporters his determination to carve up the Land of Israel and create a Palestinian state, the president declared that “the United States – which is already the biggest humanitarian aid donor in Gaza – is going to be announcing an additional $400 million in assistance for housing, school construction, business development – not only in Gaza, but also in the West Bank.”
 
This support comes in addition to the $900 million the administration was already planning to give this year, bringing the total American aid package to the Palestinians for 2010 to a whopping $1.3 billion.
 
Incredibly, Obama’s announcement came on the very same day that Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke went before Congress to warn that America needs to rein in its deficit, declaring the country’s current financial trajectory to be “unsustainable.”
 
“The risk,” Bernanke told the House of Representatives’ Budget Committee, “of ongoing deficits is the potential loss of confidence in markets and the way to reassure the markets is by creating a plausible plan for medium-term stability in the fiscal situation. Obviously you can’t run deficits of 10 per cent of GDP forever.”
 
Try telling that to Obama, who seems to have few qualms about taking out the federal checkbook and making yet another generous gift to the Palestinians.
 
And just what, you might be wondering, is the reason for this largesse, particularly at a time when most Americans are busy tightening their belts?
 
Well, according to Obama, it is really very simple: “We think it’s important for us to reaffirm once again our commitment to improving the day-to-day lives of ordinary Palestinians.”
 
So even though, by the president’s own admission, the U.S. is “already the biggest humanitarian aid donor in Gaza,” he nonetheless feels the need to “reaffirm” it to the tune of $400 million.
 
Aren’t there more inexpensive ways of doing so?
 
Worse yet, Obama is essentially rewarding the Palestinians for refusing to negotiate directly with Israel.
 
Indeed, despite repeated calls by Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu to launch direct bilateral negotiation without preconditions, the Palestinian chairman has instead preferred to limit exchanges to the indirect proximity talks being administered by U.S. Middle East envoy George Mitchell.
 
And even as Washington is lavishing praise and funds on Abbas, the Palestinians openly continue to incite violence against the Jewish state with wild abandon.
 
In the aftermath of the Gaza flotilla incident, for example, it was Abbas himself who labeled Israel’s actions a “massacre” and “state terrorism,” paving the way for the harsh international response that quickly followed.
 
But rather than holding Abbas accountable for this, Obama prefers to stuff his account.
 
Hamas, too, stands to benefit from America’s infusion of capital, half of which will reportedly go to projects in the areas under its control in Gaza.
 
Even if safeguards are put into place, and Hamas doesn’t succeed in siphoning off some of the aid money, as it has been wont to do in the past, it will still boost the terrorist group’s standing among the Palestinians living under their rule.
 
In short, this is a “lose-lose” proposition no matter how one looks at it. Obama is giving away money America cannot afford to leaders who do not deserve it for a cause that will only strengthen the radicals.
 
With congressional elections less than five months away, now would be a perfect time for American citizens to stand up and say: “Enough! We don’t want our tax dollars going to support Israel’s enemies!”
 
Each and every one of you reading this newspaper should contact your local senators and congressmen and politely but firmly express your opposition to sending further aid to the Palestinian Authority.
 
As taxpayers and voters you have the right, and the obligation, to ensure that your money is not going to fuel still more anti-Israel extremism.
 

So raise your voices and declare that while you want to see your tax dollars put to good use, there are plenty of better ways to do so than by giving Mahmoud Abbas and Gaza another unnecessary boost.

 

 

 

Michael Freund, whose Jewish Press-exclusive column appears the third week of each month, served as deputy director of Communications & Policy Planning in the Israeli Prime Minister’s Office under Benjamin Netanyahu from 1996 to 1999. He is founder and chairman of Shavei Israel (www.shavei.org), which reaches out and assists “lost Jews” seeking to return to the Jewish people.

About the Author: Jason Maoz is the Senior Editor of The Jewish Press. He can be contacted at jmaoz@jewishpress.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Your Tax Dollars At Work… In Gaza”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Russian S-300 surface-to-air missile systems deployed in a military exercise.
Russia to Deliver S-300 Missile System to Iran… Eventually
Latest Indepth Stories
Rabbi Lichtenstein (z"l).

On his shloshim, I want to discuss a term I’ve heard countless times about Rav Aharon: Gedol HaDor

Abbas and Obama

After obsequious claims of devotion to Israel, Obama took to criticizing Israel to on peace process

Ronal Shoval Voting

Mr. Obama, Israeli voters have democratically chosen to apply Israeli sovereignty over Judea&Samaria

Ayelet Shaked

Netanyahu so disdains Shaked’s appointment he completely ignored her after the swearing-in ceremony

Ronen Shamir’s just the latest tenured Leftist convicted of sexual misconduct with his own student

NY Times precious front page ink is only reserved for portrayals of Israel as the aggressor.

Although I loved law school, I doubted myself: Who would come to me, a chassidish woman lawyer?

American Jews who go gaga for Obama are first and foremost “Liberals of the Mosaic Persuasion”

“Illinois is the first state to take concrete, legally binding action against the BDS campaign”

Many books have supported the preferability- not to be confused with desirability- of the status quo

Consider the Pope’s desperation, reading daily reports of the slaughter of Christians by Muslims

The contrast between a Dem pretending to love Israel & a Dem who truly loves Israel is CRYSTAL CLEAR

Pentecost, derived from the Greek word for 50, is celebrated 50 days after Easter.

U.S and European demands for the creation of a Palestinian State in the West Bank is world hypocrisy.

We take a whole person approach, giving our people assistance with whatever they need.

During my spiritual journey I discovered G-d spoke to man only once, to the Jewish people at Sinai

More Articles from Jason Maoz
Front-Page-051515

Some of the president’s defenders took to arguing that the overwhelming majority of German military personnel interred in Bitburg were regular Wehrmacht soldiers who died on the battlefield and likely were not involved in atrocities against civilians.

Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, both outspokenly critical of Netanyahu’s upcoming visit to Congress, were wowed by him in 2011.

Note also the response to the speech by the top Democrats in the House and Senate, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, both of whom have been outspoken in their criticism of Netanyahu’s upcoming visit.

The New York State comptroller manages the state’s $180.7 billion pension fund, audits the spending practices of all state agencies and local governments, oversees the New York State and Local Retirement System, reviews the New York State and City budgets, and approves billions in State contracts and spending.

While not all criticism of Israel stemmed from anti-Semitism, Podhoretz contends the level of animosity towards Israel rises exponentially the farther left one moved along the spectrum.

When you grow up in a home where your parents went through what my parents went through, you realize that life has to be meaningful. You have to be there for other people.

“It’s a lousy column and a dishonest one,” Halberstam wrote. “So close it. Or you will end up just as shabby as Safire.”

Wye would be seen to have set the groundwork for the creation of a Palestinian state

These are not necessarily the best all-around biographies or studies of the individual presidents listed (though some rank right up there), but the strongest in terms of exploring presidential attitudes and policies toward Israel.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/your-tax-dollars-at-work-in-gaza/2010/06/16/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: