In Israel, a new five month scholarship program being offered to young aspiring athletes – one of them could be you.
After September 11, many expressed amazement at the relative ease with which illegal aliens from Arab countries were apparently able to lose themselves in American society. This in no small measure contributed to the horrific events of that day. But a startling story in this past Monday's New York Times documents that there was doubtless another related dimension as well. According to a The Times piece entitled, “After A Long, Slow Climb to Respectability, a Muslim Charity Experiences a Rapid Fall,” the US was not only duped into providing a home for terrorists, it also served as a cash cow for terrorists.
On December 3rd, President Bush froze the assets of the Texas-based Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, the nation's largest Muslim charity. According to The Times, over the years, the Foundation did everything it could to portray itself as a mainstream, benign, philanthropic machine seeking only to promote the well-being of the needy. But government documents, Arabic publications and some of the Foundation's literature directed at Arab audiences tell a far different story about what the Holy Land Foundation was really about. In documents filed in court by the FBI, the Bureau charges that the Holy land Foundation conspired with Hamas to use its money to support terrorism against Israel. Citing surveillance records and statements from informants, the Bureau claims that the Foundation provided an incentive for terrorists to attack Israel by sending money to families of suicide bombers and other terrorists.
The Times reports that in its early days, the Foundation, then known as the Occupied Land Fund, openly stated in its advertisements that its funds were available not only for educational purposes. One such advertisement appeared in the Arabic-language Ila Filastin and said:
“We call you to Jihad for the sake of Allah by donating any amount you can in support of the Intifada's families in Palestine. You can send your contributions in the name of Occupied Land Fund, P.O. Box 928, L.A., CA.”
The FBI also maintains that it has linked the Foundation's chairman, Ghassan Elashi, directly to Hamas. The agency said it bugged a meeting held in a Philadelphia hotel in 1993, “at which Mr. Elashi and two other Holy Land officials met with five leaders of Hamas. Those at the meeting, according to the Bureau, discussed how they could violently defeat the peace process and supplant the Palestinian Authority with Hamas….”
“It was mentioned that the United States provided them with a secure, legal base from which to operate,” and FBI memo on the meeting said. “The democratic environment in the United States allowed them to perform activities extremely important to their cause. In discussing financial matters, the participants stated a belief that continuation of the Holy War was inevitable.”
Although Elashi and other foundation leaders have denied all this, the FBI has said it observed all the participants entering the hotel at the time of the meeting and also confirmed their presence through American Express charge records.
The FBI says in a memo that it also overheard a meeting in Oxford, Mississippi in 1994 in which Hamas officials said that the Holy Land Foundation had been designated its primary fund-raising entity in the United States. Also, the memo recites that the FBI used American Express records to show that the Foundation paid for 11 fund-raising trips around the United States by two prominent Hamas activists in the West Bank. One informant quoted in the memo said that one of the two men was the head of the Hamas military wing in Gaza. He reportedly told guests at a fund-raising dinner in Los Angeles in 1994: “Finish off the Israelis! Kill them all! Exterminate them! No peace ever!”
Plainly, there was clear evidence in FBI files of the Holy Land Foundation's ties to Hamas since the early 1990's. Yet, until President Bush's bold step last week freezing their assets, they appear to have taken advantage of our democratic society and done their thing with impunity throughout the eight years of the Clinton administration! Yet, on the other hand, Mr. Clinton, who touted himself as the “best friend Israel ever had in the White House,” mounted a full court press on Israel “to take risks for peace.”
About the Author:
You must log in to post a comment.
How far the PA will go to present the lie as the truth and the truth as a lie? Its claim that Jesus was a Palestinian is old hat. But now the “resurrection” also refers to “the Palestinian state.”
The progressive consolidation imagines that organization can contain the messier side of man.
The Russian Yakhont missiles already delivered to Syria threaten Israel Navy ships carrying out vital missions in the Mediterranean.
America could be said to be building a united front against Iran, but at what price?
The Japanese do not feel the need to apologize to Muslims for the negative way in which they relate to Islam.
Palestinian youths from Hebron, though, who met with Israelis near Bethlehem to share their problems and insights have been forced to issue a statement distancing themselves from the meeting.
Benghazi isn’t likely to keep Hillary out of the Democratic field in 2016, but after 2008, she is justifiably paranoid.
The contractors received the land at a bargain basement price, moved the prices up to 1.8 million NIS and pocketed one million NIS per apartment.
Many of my fellow college students are quick to voice their acceptance of their LGBT friends, but they turn up their noses and frown slightly when they speak of a Hasid.
The growing revelations that the Obama State Department watered down public statements on the attack in order to cleanse them of any mention of al Qaeda and terrorism is a travesty.
We must confront Islamist groups with what Prime Minister David Cameron referred to as “muscular liberalism.”
Al-Qaradawi’s visit and statements also serve as a reminder that the Israeli-Arab conflict is centered, more than ever, around religion.
Everyone who reads newspapers should know at least one thing. Threats to annihilate Israel have always been unremarkable. Almost never, it seems, have Israel’s existential enemies sought any reason for concealment.
Mark Treyger, a candidate for city council in New York City’s 47th council district, met recently with the editorial board of The Jewish Press at the newspaper’s Boro Park office.
Israel’s government did not want to liberate Jerusalem. Or to be more specific, the Labor and National Religious Party ministers did not want to liberate Jerusalem. “Who needs that whole Vatican?” Defense Minister Moshe Dayan explained at the time.
Two recent revelations have raised serious questions about the kind of government President Obama is running.
We were dismayed by the announcement last week from Google that it was changing the name “Palestinian Territories” to “Palestine” across its products. In explaining the action, a Google spokesman said that “We consult a number of sources and authorities when naming countries…. In this case, we are following the lead of the UN, ICANN (the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers), ISO (International Organization for Standardization) and other international organizations.”
It seems clear that there is a lot more to the current developments regarding Syria than Israel’s bombing some sites there, though staunching the flow of Iranian weapons to Hizbullah through Syria is plainly a significant objective.
Secretary of State John Kerry’s recent embrace of the Arab Peace Initiative is, to say the least, unnerving. Certainly the response of Arab leaders to his action reflects the dangers for Israel inherent in the plan. President Obama seems to be preoccupied these days with Syria and Iran as well as serious domestic issues and is largely leaving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to Mr. Kerry. But the secretary of state seems poised to roil things up without any prospect of real progress.
Syria’s civil war is fast becoming one of the Obama administration’s greatest foreign policy challenges, for the moment even surpassing Iran’s march toward nuclear weaponry in its urgency. Together, both issues have effectively derailed the president’s long-range intention to focus on Asia and the emerging economic and military developments in China and other nations in the so-called Asian Pivot.
The investigation into the Boston bombings is still in its early stages but what seems to be emerging is that the presumed perpetrators were not directly linked to any foreign terrorist infrastructure. Rather, they were individual Americans radicalized by jihadist teachings and guided in their weapons-making by jihadist websites.
During the run-up to the confirmations of Secretary of State Kerry and Secretary of Defense Hagel, we and others forcefully challenged the latter over statements he had made about Iran and Israel, and were more favorably inclined toward the former.
This week Jews around the world celebrated Yom Ha’Atzmaut, Israel Independence Day. Sixty-five years ago on the day before the British mandate over Palestine was set to expire, the Jewish People’s Council, comprised of the political leadership of the Jewish residents of Palestine, proclaimed the establishment of the State of Israel.
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/a-long-festering-problem/2002/01/11/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: