Join Meir Panim’s campaign to “light up” Chanukah for families in need.
In an unusual ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals in Manhattan removed the trial judge from the celebrated stop and frisk case and stayed implementation of the restrictions she imposed on the NYPD in its use of the crime-fighting tool.
Though the court did not address the merits of U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin’s finding that the current stop and frisk program violated the rights of blacks and Hispanics, it did focus on what it saw as the appearance of the judge’s bias against the program.
The appellate court ruled that Judge Scheindlin “ran afoul” of certain provisions of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges. One provision provides that “A judge should avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all activities.” Another says “A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”
The court said “the appearance of impartiality surrounding this litigation was compromised by [Judge Scheindlin’s] improper application of the …. ‘related case rule’ ” (which generally allows lawyers to request that a judge who previously presided over cases similar to theirs be assigned – at that judge’s discretion – to their case) “and by a series of media interviews and public statements purporting to respond publicly to criticism of [her].”
The court also noted that in an earlier case involving stop and frisk over which she presided, Judge Scheindlin told the plaintiff’s lawyer, “[I]f you got proof of inappropriate racial profiling in a good constitutional case, why don’t you bring a lawsuit? You can certainly mark it as related.”
She also said, “[W]hat I am trying to say, I am sure I am going to get in trouble for saying it, for $65 you can bring that lawsuit.” Later in court she said, “And as I said before, I would accept it as a related case, which the plaintiff has the power to designate.” The current lawsuit was then brought and found its way to Judge Scheindlin.
The court also pointed out that Judge Scheindlin gave interviews about the case and criticism of her to the New York Law Journal, the Associated Press and The New Yorker magazine – a definite no-no.
Over the years Judge Scheindlin has developed a reputation for coming down hard on procedures followed by the NYPD. So whatever one thinks of the stop and frisk program, it isn’t difficult to understand why those favoring it as currently administered would have serious doubts about whether the restrictions imposed by Judge Scheindlin were fair.
The court’s decision presents the new mayor of New York with an opportunity to revisit the issue of stop and frisk and perhaps even calm the passions of a divided city. If done properly, most New Yorkers on either side of the issue will perceive that they have been given a fair shake and accept what is decided.
About the Author:
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Comments are closed.
No one would deny that the program subjected detainees to less than pleasant treatment, but the salient point is, for what purpose?
For the past six years President Obama has consistently deplored all Palestinian efforts to end-run negotiations in search of a UN-imposed agreement on Israel.
For Am Yisrael, the sun’s movements are subservient to the purpose of our existence.
Israelis now know Arab terrorism isn’t caused by Israeli occupation but by ending Israeli occupation
Anti-Semitism is a social toxin that destroys the things that people most cherish and enjoy.
Amb. Cooper highlighted the impact of the Chanukah/Maccabee spirit on America’s Founding Fathers
Zealousness has its place and time in Judaism; Thank G-d for heroic actions of the Maccabees!
Israel and the strengthening of the Jewish people in faith and numbers has brought a growing light
“Can you hear what the dead are whispering? Leave Galut, escape to Eretz Israel-Lech lecha!”
3 main messages emerged from this conference: Communications, Community, and Collaboration.
In his short time with the shul, he has managed to activate a Hebrew school with now over 50 children and five teachers.
Recent headlines show escalation of the same attitudes and actions as existed during the Holocaust
It seems to us that while the Jewish entitlement to the land of Israel transcends the Holocaust, the Jewish experience during that tragic time is the most solid of foundations for these “national rights.”
Last year the Obama administration sought to minimize civilian deaths from drone strikes by generally requiring that missile attacks be limited to instances where Americans were directly threatened and there was a “near certainty” that no civilians would be killed.
If anything, Operation Protective Edge showed that Israel will not pull punches when it comes to combating terror.
Toward the end of Operation Protective Edge this past summer, the president was unusually vocal about Israel’s so-called disproportionate use of force and alleged lack of compliance with international humanitarian law.
There was no accompanying caption, but the cartoon could not help but feed the anti-Semitic canard that Israel was responsible for 9/11.
An accomplished Torah scholar and ardent adherent of Bobov chassidus, he was renowned for his self-effacing dedication and skills as an international lawyer and law professor
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/court-ruling-on-stop-and-frisk-offers-an-important-opportunity/2013/11/06/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: