web analytics
February 26, 2015 / 7 Adar , 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Critical Anti-Terrorism Lawsuit

Represented by noted Washington lawyer Nathan Lewin, the parents of David Boim ? a 17 year-old New Yorker who was murdered by Hamas terrorists at a bus stop in Beit El, Israel on May 13, 1996 ? filed suit against several U.S.-based organizations that provided significant support and contributions to Hamas. These including the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, the Islamic Association for Palestine and the Quranic Literacy Institute. The core issue in the case is whether charities in the United States that knowingly contribute to foreign terrorist organizations that have killed and injured American citizens in bombings and other acts of terror may be sued for damages in a United States court by the American victims of these terrorist acts under a 1990 federal anti-terrorism law. A federal district judge, George W. Lindberg, ruled that the organizations could be held liable and they appealed. In an unusual move, the appeals court has asked the United States Justice Department to file a brief, amicus curiae, outlining the government's position on the legal question.

The 1990 law provides that,

Any national of the United States injured in his or her person, property, or business by reason of an act of international terrorism, or his or her estate, survivors, or heirs, may sue therefor in any appropriate district court of the United States and shall recover threefold the damages he or she sustains and the cost of the suit, including attorney's fees.

The defendants in the case maintain that this language permits a lawsuit only against the individuals who personally commit the “act of terrorism.”

New York Senators Charles Schumer (D) and Hillary Clinton (D) joined by Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA), Charles Grassley (R-A) and Richard Durbin (D-IL) have sent a letter to Attorney General John Ashcroft urging that the Justice Department's brief to the court “take a vigorous stance in support of the Boim family” in order to vindicate “Congress' purpose in enacting the law, which was to make any person or entity that contributes in any way to acts of international terror liable to victims of that terror.”

We heartily concur and hope that the great potential of this law in the battle against terrorism be realized.

About the Author:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Critical Anti-Terrorism Lawsuit”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Photo of Al Qaeda founder and former leader, Osama Bin Laden, seen above a Palestinian Authority flag.
New York Jury Convicts Saudi Man in 1998 Al Qaeda Attack on US Embassy
Latest Indepth Stories
Korenblit-022715

Obama & Putin have handwriting/signature clues indicating differences between public & private life

NY City Councilman David Greenfield: "They are angry because Hitler did not finish the job."

It’s time for a new Jewish policy regarding Ramallah, NOT just because of the yarmulke incident

Levmore-022715

“GETT’s” being screened for Israeli Rabbinical Court judges at their annual convention.

Senator Henry Jackson

If Jackson were alive he’d denounce Democratic party’s silence towards virulent anti-Semitism

Victim of Palestinian Arab terrorism, a victor in NY federal court, after years of being ignored by Justice Dept.

March 2013: Arabs hurled stones hitting the Biton’s car; Adele’s mother swerved the car-into a truck

The real issue is that in many respects the president has sought to recalibrate American values and our system of government.

Former Connecticut senator Joe Lieberman, writing in the Washington Post on Sunday, provided one of the clearest and most compelling analyses we’ve seen of the importance of the prime minister’s speech.

A central concept in any discussion about happiness is achieving clarity. “Ain simcha ela k’hataras hasefeikos” – there is no joy as that experienced with the removal of doubt.

“Je Suis..,” like its famous origin 400 years ago, implies the ability & freedom to think & question

Many anti-Israel demonstrations at universities have a not-so-latent anti-Semitic agenda as well

Believing a few “extremists” hijacked Islam is myopic in history and geography, numbers and scope

Punishment of those waging war against Allah and his messenger…is they be murdered or crucified

More Articles from Editorial Board

The real issue is that in many respects the president has sought to recalibrate American values and our system of government.

Former Connecticut senator Joe Lieberman, writing in the Washington Post on Sunday, provided one of the clearest and most compelling analyses we’ve seen of the importance of the prime minister’s speech.

Gone are the days when an anchorman sitting in a New York studio could, after sharing 22 minutes of carefully selected and edited news items, trumpet in stentorian tones, “And that’s the way it is.” No it wasn’t. It never was.

President Obama has frequently cautioned that Americans should take great care to avoid fomenting anti-Muslim passions in our reaction to the murderous activities regularly being perpetrated by terrorists in the name of Islam. One wonders why, though, he seems to have no concern with the potential for anti-Semitic fallout from his full-court press against Israeli […]

Typical of the administration’s milquetoast approach is the lack of any call for a substantial increase in military resources in order to crush ISIL, only a tepid mention of the need to “ultimately defeat” it.

He spent the first leg of his daylong visit to the French capital at Hyper Cacher.

In this particular case, the issue was whether the Arkansas prison system could prohibit, for security reasons, a devout Muslim’s maintaining a beard of a certain length as a matter of religious practice.

According to Natan Sharansky, director of the Jewish Agency for Israel, France was the largest source of Jewish emigration to Israel last year and he believes as many as 15,000 French Jews may make aliyah in 2015.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/critical-anti-terrorism-lawsuit/2001/12/14/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: