Across Israel, Meir Panim responds to the growing needs of the country’s 1.75 million impoverished residents through various food and social service programs.
As the days go by, the outlines of President Bush's strategy for dealing with the aftermath of September 11th are becoming more and more clear. As the President intimated in his riveting “This Is War”/”You Are Either With Us Or Against Us” speech to the nation, and as Secretaries Powell, Rumsfeld and Fleischer have since fleshed out, the United States is trying to craft the broadest possible coalition ? including even those who have heretofore harbored or otherwise assisted “terrorists.” And the focus of the coalition is to be on terrorism with a “global reach” ? as opposed to “terrorism” in all its forms. The primary goals are to make the overall effort to appear as nothing other than a confrontation with international outlaws and to make as many, particularly in the Arab world, part of the solution with a vested interest in its success rather than having them remain as part of the problem.
Accordingly, entrance to “the club” will ordinarily be available to all who will henceforth eschew any support for international terrorism, regardless of past record. Hence, the invitations to Syria, Iran and the PLO. And, in order to avoid desertions from the Arab world, Israel will not be formally listed as a coalition partner. Nor will terrorism directed against Israel be an explicit concern of the coalition. However, the thinking goes, because of the obvious financial, informational, training and personnel interaction between Hamas, Hizballah, Islamic Jihad, et alia and the bin Laden network, there is no way the Arab states and Arafat & Company will be able to continue fostering attacks against Israel while sitting at the anti-terrorist coalition table.
The underpinnings of this approach are is also crystallizing. The concern is not so much for the maximization, per se, of participants on our side. More and more analysts are pointing to the fragility of governments in the Arab world so that it would not take very much to destabilize them to the point of collapse under the pressure of an inflamed Muslim fundamentalism on the march. Nothing, according to this thinking, could be expected to ignite such a catastrophe more than having Arab governments being seen as participating in an anti-Muslim crusade or appearing as carrying Israel's political water.
To be sure, there is a certain surface logic to the President's plan. But one does not have to look any further back than the Oslo “peace process” debacle for instruction. There too, the theory was that a track leading to Palestinian control of territory of their own would provide an incentive to eschew violence in favor of negotiations to resolve differences. Yet, as we are painfully aware, Arafat's disavowal of violence evaporated as soon as talks broke down, after being offered what even President Clinton ? and almost everyone else ? conceded was a historic Israeli offer. Equally as important, Arafat's incitements against Israel continued throughout the course of Oslo. Nor did there seem to be any dividends for Israel even before September 11. As Norman Podhoretz devastatingly demonstrates in the current issue of Commentary magazine in “Oslo: The Peace Mongers Return,” the Arab world will never elect to accept Israel into the Middle East family.
Nor is this only a matter of concern for Israel. As we have noted, no one now believes that there is a way of separating the bin Laden terror network from the activities of the so-called “regional terrorists” such as Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Hizballah. They are all cogs in the machine and there is no meaningful distinction to be drawn. They all share resources and information as well as a deep-rooted anti-America/anti-West pathology, of which Israel is only a small part. We would be deluding ourselves at our peril ? and materially compromising the war against terrorism ? by ignoring some of the key entries on the bin Laden organizational chart.
Equally as important, Israel is being told that now is the most propitious time for it to resume negotiations with the Palestinians, even though its condition of a cessation of violence ? which the Bush administration has heretofore supported ? has not been met. The desire of Arafat and the rest of the Arab world to “get out of the penalty box,” it is said, provides an important window of opportunity to resolve differences. Yet, once again, Oslo tells us there is a fatal flaw in the analysis. And there is no getting away from the fact that as horrible as the September 11th attacks were, they are qualitatively of a piece with other acts of terror which were not rewarded with concessions.
President Bush has agonizing choices to make. But we fear that the ineluctable message, so far, is: extraordinary terror works. And, we fear we will all come soon to rue the day.
About the Author:
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Comments are closed.
The answer is an emphatic no.
The meaning of “God’s watch” here is not entirely clear.
Don’t Israelis and Arab Palestinians deserve more than this? Is it not time to stop the insanity?
At age 104, my mother was still concerned about her relationship with Hashem.
Obama’s incompetence, the way his naive worldview and credulity have made a fool of him, are equally frightening
“The only difference between this world and the time of Meshiach is our bondage to the gentile kingdoms.”
You’ve discovered our little secret!
Klein’s challenger has demonstrated a propensity to unleash poisonous vitriol, even to other Zionists
President Obama’s foreign policy is based on fantasy.
Welcome the book of Leviticus!
If the nationalist Knesset members don’t provide the answer, the Arab MKs will do so in their place.
International Agunah Day falls annually on Ta’anis Esther, this year on March 13.
Yeshiva University Museum recently hosted an exhibit titled “Threshold to the Sacred.”
Even a foxhole Yid has to admit that antisemitism is on the upswing.
One can almost imagine a shocked Mr. Kerry thinking to himself, “How could he?” Yet not only did Mr. Putin do what he did, China, one of the three major international players along with the U.S. and Russia, agreed with him, not with Mr. Kerry.
We are not unmindful that generally appropriate governmental initiatives may have some inappropriate aspects in execution.
Al Qaeda, despite President Obama’s claims to the contrary, is newly resurgent and no doubt salivating at the prospect of a severely diminished U.S. military capacity.
Last month, after the Israeli government published plans for new construction, the State Department promptly repeated its longstanding refrain that the settlements were “illegitimate” and that “It is never helpful to have steps taken that are not conducive to our efforts to move forward on peace.”
While the thrust of the proposed law is easily understandable, there is a problem as well. The current draft requires claimants to prove malicious intent on the part of the present holder of the property, which some legal authorities say would be extremely difficult.
Recent stories in the Israeli media, citing “unnamed sources,” indicate that Mr. Kerry failed to get backing from President Obama to confront Israel over its rejection of his peace proposals
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/getting-out-of-the-penalty-box/2001/11/03/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online:
No related posts.