Close your eyes, breathe in deeply, now exhale slowly… That was easy, wasn’t it? Not for everyone…
We were dismayed by the announcement last week from Google that it was changing the name “Palestinian Territories” to “Palestine” across its products. In explaining the action, a Google spokesman said that “We consult a number of sources and authorities when naming countries…. In this case, we are following the lead of the UN, ICANN (the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers), ISO (International Organization for Standardization) and other international organizations.”
ICANN is a non-governmental international organization that coordinates the Internet’s system of unique identifiers and addresses. The ISO, also an international non-governmental body, promotes standardization in various fields around the world. Following the UN General Assembly’s granting non-member observer state status to “Palestine,” both ICANN and the ISO followed suit and began referring to “Palestinian territories” as “Palestine.”
It is not yet clear how far Google intends to go with “Palestine.” At this point Google has changed the logo of its localized search pages serving the Palestinians to read “Palestine” rather than “Palestinian territories.” Even this seemingly innocuous move is significant since localized search pages serving the United Kingdom, France and other countries list the name of the particular country served on the local logo.
Some Israeli officials downplayed the matter, noting that Google is not a government or an international organization like the UN. But such calm is misplaced. The Palestinians reacted with glee to this recognition, rightly seeing it as a form of “virtual recognition.” Google has a global reach and its move to rebrand “Palestine” will be understood by untold millions as somehow defining.
Google certainly has come a long way from its original mission statement, in which it proposed “to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful.”
About the Author:
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Comments are closed.
How and when is it appropriate for pulpit rabbis to comment publicly on the Iran issue?
David was many things: Brother, son, grandson, nephew, uncle, cousin, talmid, comrade, AND a WARRIOR
Some Israelis seem to have forgotten no one has yet tracked down the murderers of Ali Bawabsheh.
“Isn’t it enough that the whole world hates us? WHy do we have to hate each other?”
Who said Kerry won no concessions from Iran? He secured pistachios and Beluga caviar for America!
In 2015, Israel’s fertility rate (3+ births per woman) is higher than all Arab countries except 3
The New Israel Fund, as usual, condemns the State of Israel rather than condemning a horrible act.
I sought a Muslim group that claims to preach a peaceful and accepting posture of Islam, Ahmadiyya
While Orthodox men are encouraged to achieve and celebrated for it, Orthodox women too often are not
Jonathan remember, as long as you’re denied your right to come home to Israel you’re still in prison
Reports of a dead baby, a devastated family, and indications of a gloating attacker.
“The fear of being exposed publicly is the only thing that will stop people,” observed Seewald.
“Yesha” and Binyamin Regional Council leaders said the attack “is not the path of Jews in Judea and Samaria.”
The occasion? The rarely performed mitzvah of pidyon peter chamor: Redemption of a firstborn donkey.
The next day, in a speech in New York to the Council on Foreign Relations, Mr. Kerry substantially upped the ante.
Mr. Silver’s legislation changed the primary date to April 19, which avoids any conflict. And, we are happy to say, he received the support of Republicans in the legislature for changing the date.
The issue of the Chief Rabbinate’s control over conversions and other life-cycle matters has long been a contentious one.
Can adoption agencies limit the placement of children to heterosexual couples only?
The court’s finding that the president has exclusive jurisdiction in recognizing foreign countries might have been be apt if the issue at hand were a congressional attempt to grant recognition to “Palestine” as a state.
It wasn’t too long ago that Mr. Erdogan, in his determination to burnish Turkey’s credentials as an Islamist state at the cost of the secularism that had brought much economic and political success to Turkey, upended his country’s decades-long cooperative relationship with Israel.
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/google-goes-political/2013/05/08/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: