web analytics
April 19, 2015 / 30 Nisan, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


No Compromise With Hamas

The belligerency with which Hamas has made its demands known in the various rounds of efforts to forge a cease-fire with Israel – even in the wake of the profound devastation visited upon Gaza during Operation Protective Edge – makes it clear the terrorist outfit began the current war in order to force a political settlement that would accommodate its core needs.

Thus Hamas has taken the hardest of lines regarding an end to the Israeli blockade of Gaza and the opening of a Mediterranean seaport to enable international trade, declaring that there can be no discussions about a cease-fire unless Israel agrees in advance to meet its demands.

Israel’s insistence on a demilitarized Gaza and international monitoring as part of any cease-fire agreement flows from its understanding of the intrinsic nature of Hamas, an organization defined by its refusal to accept the existence of Israel and commitment to its violent demise.

Hamas has coupled its ideological intolerance of the existence of Israel with numerous terrorist attacks and rocket launchings. And most recently it created an existential threat to Israel with the construction of a vast network of military tunnels extending into Israel.

Providentially, Israel was able to locate the majority of the tunnels and destroy them after several Hamas terrorists emerged from one of them in the course of Operation Protective Edge. Plainly, Israel cannot permit Hamas the opportunity to rebuild its capacity to attack or even pose a threat to Israel.

Similarly, Israel’s refusal to end all its restrictions on the flow of what goes into or out of Gaza stems from the reasonable fear that Hamas can be counted on to take advantage of any means it has to advance its goal of harming and, if it could, eradicating Israel.

Given the dynamics of international diplomacy and the normal human impulse to avoid bloodshed, one fully expects Israel, as the civilized and responsible party in this conflict, to come under enormous pressure to compromise. Indeed, there are signs that such importuning is already in play.

Secretary of State Kerry continues to talk about the need for the cease-fire negotiations to address the underlying issues between Israel and Hamas. Incredibly, despite Mr. Kerry’s constant refrain that Hamas’s terrorist attacks precipitating Operation Protective Edge should not be rewarded in any agreement, he has no problem with urging Israel to go along with giving Hamas a platform for its grievances – and possibly more.

President Obama went in the same general direction in an interview last week with Tom Friedman of The New York Times. In Mr. Friedman’s words, the president urged an approach of “No victor, no vanquished and work together,” a formulation that clearly envisions all sides to the dispute having a right to be heard.

Finally, comparisons are increasingly being made between the leadership of Hamas and that of the Palestinian Authority. The PA’s Mahmoud Abbas, it is said, can be trusted to implement any deals made with Hamas. Judging from Mr. Abbas’s actions, however, he seems to share much of Hamas’s antipathy for Israel.

Indeed, he names roads and other public projects after terrorist “martyrs” who killed Jews on buses and in other public places and he provides stipends to the families of the “heroes” imprisoned by Israel for the murder and maiming of Jews. Nor can it be said he has negotiated in good faith, given his penchant for making end runs to the UN to try to get what he wants without having to make reasonable concessions at the negotiating table.

It is not hard to understand why Hamas wished to instigate a war with Israel. The blockade (magnified by Egypt’s closure of the Rafah crossing) and lack of access to the sea has crippled the Gazan economy and its Hamas rulers were desperate to change perceptions, if not reality.

About the Author:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

4 Responses to “No Compromise With Hamas”

  1. No compromise and if they fire rockets tonight IDF should finish them.

  2. Ali Haider says:

    Just like hitler, no compromise with Jews

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Said Arikat, al-Quds Washington, D.C. reporter. Jan. 29, 2015
More PA Lobbying from the State Dept Briefing Room
Latest Indepth Stories
Temple Israel Of Boston

“The resentment towards us (Jews/Israelis) was really intense. They clearly hate Zionism & Zionists”

US has no problem with Egypt's bombing hundreds of homes of Gaza civilians but can't stand to see Israel destroy a terrorist's home.

Egypt has been more effective against Gazan smuggling tunnels than Israel’s military operations

Mrs. Golda Katz a"h

She had many names and was many things to many people, but to me she was just Babineni.

ISIS terrorist carries the group's black flag.

Is ISIS in Gaza? “No, but there are ISIS loyalists here..we pray to God they unite under ISIS’ flag”

Rabbi Portal was that great “inspirer,” changing people for the better, enriching the lives of all

Iran knows Obama, Putin, and the Europeans don’t have a Red Line beyond which they will go to war

There is no way to explain the Holocaust. I know survivors who are not on speaking terms with G-d. I know many who are the opposite. I have no right to go there…

When a whole side of your family perishes, friends become the extended family you do not have.

“We stand with Israel because of its values and its greatness and because its such a wonderful ally”

Mr. Obama himself inelegantly cautioned members of the Senate to be careful not to “screw up” the negotiations by seeking to have input into the future of the sanctions regime that has been imposed on Iran.

For our community, Mrs. Clinton’s foreign policy record will doubtless attract the most attention. And it is a most interesting one.

Mitchell Bard is nothing if not prolific. He has written and edited 23 books, including “The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Middle East” and “The Arab Lobby: The Invisible Alliance That Undermines America’s Interests in the Middle East.” Bard, who has a Ph.D. in political science from UCLA, is also the executive director of both the […]

Understanding the process described in Dayenu reveals deep relevance for us today.

For Rabbi Zvi Yehuda Kook, the tanks, planes, and uniforms of the IDF were implements of mitzvot

More Articles from Editorial Board

For our community, Mrs. Clinton’s foreign policy record will doubtless attract the most attention. And it is a most interesting one.

He went on to say that the United States would defend Israel if it were “attacked by any state.”

In their zechus may we all come to appreciate that life is a fleeting gift and resolve to spend every precious moment of it as if it were the last.

A worthy idea any way you look at it.

If nothing really changes in the hearts and minds of the Palestinians, is Israel obligated to provide them and its other adversaries launching pads for attacks?

The United States placed enormous pressure on Israel to relinquish its gains, which Prime Minister Ben-Gurion did with great reluctance.

The real issue is that in many respects the president has sought to recalibrate American values and our system of government.

Former Connecticut senator Joe Lieberman, writing in the Washington Post on Sunday, provided one of the clearest and most compelling analyses we’ve seen of the importance of the prime minister’s speech.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/no-compromise-with-hamas/2014/08/13/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: