Join Meir Panim’s campaign to “light up” Chanukah for families in need.
The belligerency with which Hamas has made its demands known in the various rounds of efforts to forge a cease-fire with Israel – even in the wake of the profound devastation visited upon Gaza during Operation Protective Edge – makes it clear the terrorist outfit began the current war in order to force a political settlement that would accommodate its core needs.
Thus Hamas has taken the hardest of lines regarding an end to the Israeli blockade of Gaza and the opening of a Mediterranean seaport to enable international trade, declaring that there can be no discussions about a cease-fire unless Israel agrees in advance to meet its demands.
Israel’s insistence on a demilitarized Gaza and international monitoring as part of any cease-fire agreement flows from its understanding of the intrinsic nature of Hamas, an organization defined by its refusal to accept the existence of Israel and commitment to its violent demise.
Hamas has coupled its ideological intolerance of the existence of Israel with numerous terrorist attacks and rocket launchings. And most recently it created an existential threat to Israel with the construction of a vast network of military tunnels extending into Israel.
Providentially, Israel was able to locate the majority of the tunnels and destroy them after several Hamas terrorists emerged from one of them in the course of Operation Protective Edge. Plainly, Israel cannot permit Hamas the opportunity to rebuild its capacity to attack or even pose a threat to Israel.
Similarly, Israel’s refusal to end all its restrictions on the flow of what goes into or out of Gaza stems from the reasonable fear that Hamas can be counted on to take advantage of any means it has to advance its goal of harming and, if it could, eradicating Israel.
Given the dynamics of international diplomacy and the normal human impulse to avoid bloodshed, one fully expects Israel, as the civilized and responsible party in this conflict, to come under enormous pressure to compromise. Indeed, there are signs that such importuning is already in play.
Secretary of State Kerry continues to talk about the need for the cease-fire negotiations to address the underlying issues between Israel and Hamas. Incredibly, despite Mr. Kerry’s constant refrain that Hamas’s terrorist attacks precipitating Operation Protective Edge should not be rewarded in any agreement, he has no problem with urging Israel to go along with giving Hamas a platform for its grievances – and possibly more.
President Obama went in the same general direction in an interview last week with Tom Friedman of The New York Times. In Mr. Friedman’s words, the president urged an approach of “No victor, no vanquished and work together,” a formulation that clearly envisions all sides to the dispute having a right to be heard.
Finally, comparisons are increasingly being made between the leadership of Hamas and that of the Palestinian Authority. The PA’s Mahmoud Abbas, it is said, can be trusted to implement any deals made with Hamas. Judging from Mr. Abbas’s actions, however, he seems to share much of Hamas’s antipathy for Israel.
Indeed, he names roads and other public projects after terrorist “martyrs” who killed Jews on buses and in other public places and he provides stipends to the families of the “heroes” imprisoned by Israel for the murder and maiming of Jews. Nor can it be said he has negotiated in good faith, given his penchant for making end runs to the UN to try to get what he wants without having to make reasonable concessions at the negotiating table.
It is not hard to understand why Hamas wished to instigate a war with Israel. The blockade (magnified by Egypt’s closure of the Rafah crossing) and lack of access to the sea has crippled the Gazan economy and its Hamas rulers were desperate to change perceptions, if not reality.
About the Author:
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Comments are closed.
Obama’s foreign policy is viewed by both liberals and conservatives as deeply flawed
Many journalists are covertly blaming the Charlie Hebdo writers themselves through self-censorship.
Why does the Times relay different motivations and narratives for jihadists in Europe and Israel?
Combating Amalek doesn’t mean all who disagree with you is evil-rather whom to follow and to oppose
Desperate people take what they can, seizing opportunity to advance their main goal; the Arabs don’t
There was a glaring void in the President’s State of the Union speech: Israel.
Let’s focus not on becoming an ATM for that little bundle of joy, but on what you can save in taxes.
Since the passing of the Governance bill legislation on March 11, 2014, new alignments have become to appear in Israeli politics.
Israel has some wild places left; places to reflect and think, to get lost, to try to find ourselves
The British government assured Anglo-Jewry that it is attacking the rising levels of anti-Semitism.
Obama’s Syrian policy failures created the current situation in the Golan Heights.
Our journey begins by attempting to see things differently, only then can we be open to change.
Despite Western ‘Conventional Wisdom&PC,’ the Arab/Israeli conflict was never about the Palestinians
Confrontation & accountability, proven techniques, might also help dealing with religious terrorists
In this particular case, the issue was whether the Arkansas prison system could prohibit, for security reasons, a devout Muslim’s maintaining a beard of a certain length as a matter of religious practice.
Despite the president’s respectable anti-terrorism record, he doubtless has little interest in being identified with anything that might suggest, however tangentially, criticism of Muslims or Islam.
One wonders what connection that rejection has with turning to the ICC, which would allow the Palestinians to bring war-crime charges against individual Israelis and is certainly one more step away from seeking a negotiated settlement.
In the NPR interview, Mr. Obama said Iran could become a “very successful regional power” if it agreed to a long-term nuclear deal.
Thus, despite the increasingly serious problems for the mayor arising out of the current anti-police protests, Mr. de Blasio apparently will be cut no slack by those who seem to be aiming for a significant role in running the city from the streets and who will do whatever they can to prevent their momentum from ebbing.
Despite strong pressure to throw the book at the accused, Mr. Thompson allowed him to plead guilty to assault.
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/no-compromise-with-hamas/2014/08/13/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: