In Israel, a new five month scholarship program being offered to young aspiring athletes – one of them could be you.
Ever since 9/11, President Bush’s constant refrain has been an uncompromising effort at eliminating terror and its infrastructure around the world. Plainly, this has not been the product of a Pollyannish notion of refashioning the world in the American image, but rather of a hard-nosed evaluation of what it will take to minimize the threat from fundamentalists around the world bent on America’s destruction.
Thus, soon after 9/11, Mr. Bush declared that he would pursue the Bin Ladens of the world wherever they were hiding, and cautioned that the governments that harbored them must either
“cough them up” or be deemed as collaborators and face a U.S. driven effort at “regime change.” The ousting of the Taliban from Afghanistan and Operation Iraqi Freedom followed.
Now, as Saddam Hussein is fast being relegated to the dust bin of history, it is important that President Bush stay on message. Despite the blandishments of those in Europe who opposed him for not compromising on Iraq, and even the importunings of those like Prime Minister Blair who supported him, Mr. Bush must not exempt Yasir Arafat from “regime change.” Surely there can be no doubt at this point that Arafat is an unreconstructed terrorist who, despite his regular renunciations of violence, continues to deem the “intifadah” as legitimate resistance. Indeed, the transcripts of the interrogation of Marawan Barghouti document how he was so
recently Arafat’s financial conduit to the Fatah’s military wing and the Al Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigade.
But it is not only that preserving Yasir Arafat would represent a double standard. Only if the President is firm in his resolve that we will not do business as usual and look to paper over problems will the Arab world begin to take us seriously. Should an exception be made for Arafat and Palestinian terror, it would send the inescapable message that the steam is running out of U.S. resolve.
The appointment of Abu Mazen as Palestinian Prime Minister is being widely touted as tantamount to a Palestinian “regime change.” Yet virtually all commentators have noted that real power on military and security matters and negotiations with Israel is retained by Arafat. Thus, our announcement of the so-called “roadmap” to Mideast peace at this time is a declaration that we are no longer serious and we really are back to the Clintonian posture of business as usual and prepared to defer dealing with the post 9/11 challenges. The premise of the roadmap is that all parties are serious about peaceful resolution of differences. The Palestinian side, however, has yet to demonstrate there is any point in giving it a seat at the table.
The State Department’s desire to repair relations with Europe, Tony Blair’s political problems and fear of Senator John Kerry and the Democrats seizing a possible political issue for 2004 cannot be allowed to dilute our message. Operation Iraqi Freedom did not follow a “failure of diplomacy” on the part of the Bush Administration as Kerry recently charged. It was just never in the cards that Europe would have gone along with military action against Saddam Hussein. France in particular had too much financial interest in preserving the Saddam Hussein regime, and the French and most of the rest of the world continue to be fixated on denying the U.S. opportunities to project its power around the world.
This is not the time for roadmaps. It is time for honest, hard-nosed analysis – and perseverance.
About the Author:
You must log in to post a comment.
How far the PA will go to present the lie as the truth and the truth as a lie? Its claim that Jesus was a Palestinian is old hat. But now the “resurrection” also refers to “the Palestinian state.”
The progressive consolidation imagines that organization can contain the messier side of man.
The Russian Yakhont missiles already delivered to Syria threaten Israel Navy ships carrying out vital missions in the Mediterranean.
America could be said to be building a united front against Iran, but at what price?
The Japanese do not feel the need to apologize to Muslims for the negative way in which they relate to Islam.
Palestinian youths from Hebron, though, who met with Israelis near Bethlehem to share their problems and insights have been forced to issue a statement distancing themselves from the meeting.
Benghazi isn’t likely to keep Hillary out of the Democratic field in 2016, but after 2008, she is justifiably paranoid.
The contractors received the land at a bargain basement price, moved the prices up to 1.8 million NIS and pocketed one million NIS per apartment.
Many of my fellow college students are quick to voice their acceptance of their LGBT friends, but they turn up their noses and frown slightly when they speak of a Hasid.
The growing revelations that the Obama State Department watered down public statements on the attack in order to cleanse them of any mention of al Qaeda and terrorism is a travesty.
We must confront Islamist groups with what Prime Minister David Cameron referred to as “muscular liberalism.”
Al-Qaradawi’s visit and statements also serve as a reminder that the Israeli-Arab conflict is centered, more than ever, around religion.
Everyone who reads newspapers should know at least one thing. Threats to annihilate Israel have always been unremarkable. Almost never, it seems, have Israel’s existential enemies sought any reason for concealment.
Mark Treyger, a candidate for city council in New York City’s 47th council district, met recently with the editorial board of The Jewish Press at the newspaper’s Boro Park office.
Israel’s government did not want to liberate Jerusalem. Or to be more specific, the Labor and National Religious Party ministers did not want to liberate Jerusalem. “Who needs that whole Vatican?” Defense Minister Moshe Dayan explained at the time.
Two recent revelations have raised serious questions about the kind of government President Obama is running.
We were dismayed by the announcement last week from Google that it was changing the name “Palestinian Territories” to “Palestine” across its products. In explaining the action, a Google spokesman said that “We consult a number of sources and authorities when naming countries…. In this case, we are following the lead of the UN, ICANN (the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers), ISO (International Organization for Standardization) and other international organizations.”
It seems clear that there is a lot more to the current developments regarding Syria than Israel’s bombing some sites there, though staunching the flow of Iranian weapons to Hizbullah through Syria is plainly a significant objective.
Secretary of State John Kerry’s recent embrace of the Arab Peace Initiative is, to say the least, unnerving. Certainly the response of Arab leaders to his action reflects the dangers for Israel inherent in the plan. President Obama seems to be preoccupied these days with Syria and Iran as well as serious domestic issues and is largely leaving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to Mr. Kerry. But the secretary of state seems poised to roil things up without any prospect of real progress.
Syria’s civil war is fast becoming one of the Obama administration’s greatest foreign policy challenges, for the moment even surpassing Iran’s march toward nuclear weaponry in its urgency. Together, both issues have effectively derailed the president’s long-range intention to focus on Asia and the emerging economic and military developments in China and other nations in the so-called Asian Pivot.
The investigation into the Boston bombings is still in its early stages but what seems to be emerging is that the presumed perpetrators were not directly linked to any foreign terrorist infrastructure. Rather, they were individual Americans radicalized by jihadist teachings and guided in their weapons-making by jihadist websites.
During the run-up to the confirmations of Secretary of State Kerry and Secretary of Defense Hagel, we and others forcefully challenged the latter over statements he had made about Iran and Israel, and were more favorably inclined toward the former.
This week Jews around the world celebrated Yom Ha’Atzmaut, Israel Independence Day. Sixty-five years ago on the day before the British mandate over Palestine was set to expire, the Jewish People’s Council, comprised of the political leadership of the Jewish residents of Palestine, proclaimed the establishment of the State of Israel.
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/no-time-to-blink-2/2003/05/09/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online:
No related posts.