The Celebrate Israel Festival on May 31 at Pier 94, slated to be the largest gathering to date of Israeli-Americans in New York.
It almost seems like it is open season on Jews and Israel. As we noted here, the president of Egypt can characterize Zionists and Jews as descendants of pigs and apes and call for indoctrinating Egyptian children in Jew-hatred and somehow not risk losing generous American financial and military assistance. To be sure, President Obama roundly criticized the comments and demanded an apology. But actual consequences for Egypt and Mr. Morsi in the real world will be non-existent.
This past Sunday – on International Holocaust Memorial Day – Britain’s Sunday Times ran a cartoon that depicted a burly and menacing Prime Minister Netanyahu, wielding a blood-covered trowel, in the process of building a wall using the blood and limbs of trapped, writhing Palestinians. It carried the caption, “Israeli Elections – Will Cementing Peace Continue?”
The Sunday Times initially defended the travesty, describing it as a “typically robust cartoon by Gerald Scarfe,” its long-time political cartoonist. It added, “The Sunday Times firmly believes that it is not anti-Semitic. It is aimed squarely at Mr. Netanyahu and his policies, not at Israel, let alone at Jewish people.”
Right. And we are to assume that the cartoon’s dredging up of infamous blood libels against Jews never occurred to Mr. Scarfe or his defenders? Or that its appearance on the day set aside for remembering the Nazi genocide was merely coincidental?
It is the sheer presumption and arrogance of the defense that is the point here. Do they think everything goes in the name of condemning the Jewish state’s effort to defend itself against savage hordes that think nothing of targeting innocent children? Is it really a self-evident proposition that there is no possible Jewish side to the controversy? Didn’t the “wall” virtually eliminate terrorist attacks against Jews?
The paper’s publisher, Rupert Murdoch, apologized when he learned about the cartoon, referring to it as “grotesque.” Yet the fact remains that senior professional personnel of a major newspaper believed they could get away with something like this.
Consider also that the political science department at Brooklyn College, part of the City University of New York system, is co-sponsoring a forum along with student and community groups that urge an international boycott of Israel over what the groups charge are violations of Palestinian rights. The event is scheduled for February 7 and will feature virulently anti-Israel speakers.
Again, the underlying assumption is that the Israeli position is so self-evidently without merit that anyone can say anything about Israel and expect to get away with it. Universities, of course, have long been hotbeds of anti-Israel activism and dissent from the party line can be dangerous; the concept of the university as a free marketplace of ideas has largely been rendered ludicrous. What really rankles, though, is that a publicly funded college would foster such one-sidedness through the affirmative support of its political science department.
A publicly funded educational institution has no business encouraging students to pursue a fiercely partisan approach to a complex issue. Administrators need to hear from the many alumni who are no doubt upset that anti-Israel agitation has achieved a solid foothold at Brooklyn College.
About the Author:
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Comments are closed.
U.S and European demands for the creation of a Palestinian State in the West Bank is world hypocrisy.
We take a whole person approach, giving our people assistance with whatever they need.
During my spiritual journey I discovered G-d spoke to man only once, to the Jewish people at Sinai
Connecting Bamidbar&Shavuot is simple-A world without Torah is midbar; with Torah a blessed paradise
Many Black protesters compared Baltimore’s unrest to the Palestinian penchant of terrorism & rioting
She credited success to “mini” decisions-Small choices building on each other leading to big changes
Shavuot 1915, 200000 Jews were expelled; amongst the largest single expulsions since Roman times
Realizing there was no US military threat, Iran resumed, expanded & accelerated its nuclear program
“Enlightened Jews” who refuse to show chareidim the tolerance they insist we give to Arabs sicken me
Somewhat surprisingly, the Vatican’s unwelcome gesture was diametrically at odds with what President Obama signaled in an interview with the news outlet Al Arabiya.
The recent solid victory of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud Party produced something very different.
The reaction is so strong that nine times out of ten, parents engage in some form of coping mechanism before arriving at a level of acceptance of a special-needs diagnosis.
“…his neshamah reached out to us to have the zechus of Torah learning to take with him on his final journey.”
“Let’s get something straight so we don’t kid each other…[the Iranians] already have paved a path to a bomb’s worth of material,” said Mr. Biden. “Iran could get there now if they walked away in two to three months without a deal.”
The president is unwilling to cede any of what he considers his exclusive powers in the area of foreign policy and has struggled mightily to keep the Senate away from any role in the kind of deal to be negotiated.
A committed Religious Zionist, he was a sought-after adviser on Zionist affairs around the world.
More important, Mr. Obama is simply acceding to Iran’s position on the timing of the lifting of sanctions.
For our community, Mrs. Clinton’s foreign policy record will doubtless attract the most attention. And it is a most interesting one.
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/open-season/2013/01/30/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: