The Celebrate Israel Festival on May 31 at Pier 94, slated to be the largest gathering to date of Israeli-Americans in New York.
The hoopla surrounding the meeting in Washington this week of Israeli and Palestinian representatives appears to be much about little.
As we’ve noted in recent weeks, wide gaps exist between the parties on even what there is to negotiate. So rather than the significant breakthrough touted by Secretary of State John Kerry, the decision to resume some manner of negotiations seems to be more a case of both sides being unwilling to play the role of the skunk at the garden party.
One can certainly understand the unwillingness of Israel and the Palestinians to dismiss Mr. Kerry’s efforts out of hand. After all, a U.S. secretary of state has enormous power and influence and few are anxious to tangle with him on his signature issue. Even so, the run-up to this most preliminary of meetings has revealed some alarming truths.
For starters, there is a great disparity between what was expected from Israel and from the Palestinians. That Israel is to release 104 Palestinian prisoners as a “confidence building measure” without any discernible concession from the Palestinian side is quite extraordinary.
It is impossible to identify anything of substance in the public record that PA President Mahmoud Abbas has conceded other than his having agreed to sit down to a pre-negotiation meeting. But Israel’s commitment to release prisoners – a longstanding Palestinian demand – is a significant event.
Peace agreements typically provide for repatriation of prisoners after a deal is struck, not before, and even then only after the implementation of the agreement has begun. And it should be noted that prisoners who are released at the end of hostilities usually pose little risk of recidivism. This does not hold true in the case of the Palestinians, however, even if the prisoners are released piecemeal as negotiations progress.
Hardly encouraging were statements made by Mr. Abbas in Cairo on Monday that seem to be a window into his thinking.
Concerning the West Bank, Mr. Abbas said that no Israeli settlers or border forces could remain in a future Palestinian state. He went on to say that Palestinians consider all Jewish settlement building on land Israel seized in 1967 to be illegal.
“In a final resolution,” he said, “we would not see the presence of a single Israeli – civilian or soldier – on our lands.”
(Israel has always insisted that it must retain a military presence on the border with Jordan to prevent the movement of weapons.)
It will be recalled that Israel has long insisted that there be no preconditions to a return to negotiations. The Palestinians, however, insisted on three main conditions: release of Palestinian prisoners jailed prior to the Oslo agreement; a total freeze on settlement building; and Israeli acceptance of the 1967 lines as the baseline for the borders of a future Palestinian state.
Israel has already announced a prisoner release. Mr. Abbas said on Monday that he will continue to insist on a total settlement freeze. Asked whether Prime Minister Netanyahu had agreed in advance of negotiations to a cessation of settlement building, Mr. Abbas responded by saying, “There was a request, ‘We’ll only build here, what do you think?’ If I agreed, I would legitimize all the rest [of the settlements]. I said no. I said out loud and in writing that to us settlements in their entirety are illegitimate.” Asked whether Secretary Kerry will try to pressure Israel to adopt a de facto freeze, Mr. Abbas smiled and said, “I don’t know.”
Senior aides to Mr. Abbas said that in the next few days Mr. Kerry will issue a statement endorsing the 1967 lines as the basis for negotiations and then seek to pressure Israel to support this approach.
If true, this would represent a complete capitulation on the part of Israel and the United States, both having heretofore taken the position that there be no preconditions to the resumption of talks. But before supporters of Israel descend into possibly premature despair, it needs to be pointed out that these remarks are coming from Palestinian officials and spokesmen who, if they’ve accomplished nothing else in the public arena, have raised prevarication and outright lying to an art form.
About the Author:
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Comments are closed.
On his shloshim, I want to discuss a term I’ve heard countless times about Rav Aharon: Gedol HaDor
After obsequious claims of devotion to Israel, Obama took to criticizing Israel on peace process
Mr. Obama, Israeli voters have democratically chosen to apply Israeli sovereignty over Judea&Samaria
Ronen Shamir’s just the latest tenured Leftist convicted of sexual misconduct with his own student
NY Times precious front page ink is only reserved for portrayals of Israel as the aggressor.
Although I loved law school, I doubted myself: Who would come to me, a chassidish woman lawyer?
American Jews who go gaga for Obama are first and foremost “Liberals of the Mosaic Persuasion”
“Illinois is the first state to take concrete, legally binding action against the BDS campaign”
Many books have supported the preferability- not to be confused with desirability- of the status quo
Consider the Pope’s desperation, reading daily reports of the slaughter of Christians by Muslims
The contrast between a Dem pretending to love Israel & a Dem who truly loves Israel is CRYSTAL CLEAR
Pentecost, derived from the Greek word for 50, is celebrated 50 days after Easter.
U.S and European demands for the creation of a Palestinian State in the West Bank is world hypocrisy.
We take a whole person approach, giving our people assistance with whatever they need.
“Let’s get something straight so we don’t kid each other…[the Iranians] already have paved a path to a bomb’s worth of material,” said Mr. Biden. “Iran could get there now if they walked away in two to three months without a deal.”
The president is unwilling to cede any of what he considers his exclusive powers in the area of foreign policy and has struggled mightily to keep the Senate away from any role in the kind of deal to be negotiated.
A committed Religious Zionist, he was a sought-after adviser on Zionist affairs around the world.
More important, Mr. Obama is simply acceding to Iran’s position on the timing of the lifting of sanctions.
For our community, Mrs. Clinton’s foreign policy record will doubtless attract the most attention. And it is a most interesting one.
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/perversity-on-display/2013/07/31/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: