Join Meir Panim’s campaign to “light up” Chanukah for families in need.
It seems clear that there is a lot more to the current developments regarding Syria than Israel’s bombing some sites there, though staunching the flow of Iranian weapons to Hizbullah through Syria is plainly a significant objective.
For one thing, President Obama seized on the attacks as an opportunity to reiterate his support of Israel’s right to do what, in its judgment, it has to in order to protect its citizens – in this case interdicting deadly weapons to be used against Israel. This straightforward declaration, sans the typical non-committal jargon we have come to expect from public officials, is most welcome and should be applauded for the message it sends to Israel’s enemies, including Iran. But it also sends the implicit message that he reserves a similar right to make judgment when it comes to protecting the interests of the United States – a significant matter given the differences between Israel and the U.S. over the threats posed by Iran and Syria.
Israel’s successful bombing of Syrian targets seems to have given the lie to dire warnings concerning the capability of Syria’s anti-aircraft defenses. This is a message of sorts to the Iranians as well that Israel – and by extension the U.S. – will not, when push comes to shove, be deterred by extravagant threats and that a way will be found to do what has to be done.
Then there was the matter of the president’s unfortunate gaffe in drawing a line regarding Syria’s use of chemical weapons. In a warning to President Bashar Assad, Mr. Obama said that “A red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized.” He followed up later with, “The use of chemical weapons is and would be totally unacceptable…. If you make the tragic mistake of using these weapons, there will be consequences and you will be held accountable.”
Apparently, those strong words from the president, delivered at a press conference in answer to a reporter’s question, were beyond what was originally contemplated. As a senior administration official told The New York Times, “The idea was to put a chill into the Assad regime without actually trapping the president into any predetermined action…what the president said…was unscripted.”
Now, risking an erosion of credibility on the international stage, the president is having second thoughts on how to react and is reduced to proclaiming a lack of clear and convincing evidence concerning the use of chemical weapons. To be sure, whether to commit the U.S. to war over the use of chemical weapons in a civil war far from home is not an easy call. But the president seems to have boxed himself in, at least in the short run.
Indeed there is plenty in play on the Syrian front.
About the Author:
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Comments are closed.
Israel projects global material illumination not always the light of “morality” meant by the Navi
“Mr. Prime Minister, declare a unilateral ceasefire! Remember, Blessed is the peacemaker!”
If the UN Grants national recognition to Palestine, why stop there? Tibet, Chechnya, Basque…
The decision to not publicly light the Menorah in Sydney, epitomizes the eternal dilemma of Judaism and Jews in the Diaspora.
Am Yisrael is one family, filled with excruciating pain&sorrow for losing the 4 kedoshim of Har Nof
What is its message of the dreidel?” The complexity and hidden nature of history and miracles.
Police play down Arab terrorism as mere “violence” until the truth can no longer be hidden.
The 7 branches of the menorah represent the 7 pillars of secular wisdom, knowledge, and science.
Obama obtained NO verifiable commitments from Cuba it would desist from acts prejudicial to the US
No one would deny that the program subjected detainees to less than pleasant treatment, but the salient point is, for what purpose?
For the past six years President Obama has consistently deplored all Palestinian efforts to end-run negotiations in search of a UN-imposed agreement on Israel.
It’s not an admiration. It is simply a kind of journalist fascination. It stands out, it’s different from more traditional Orthodoxy.
It seems to us that while the Jewish entitlement to the land of Israel transcends the Holocaust, the Jewish experience during that tragic time is the most solid of foundations for these “national rights.”
Last year the Obama administration sought to minimize civilian deaths from drone strikes by generally requiring that missile attacks be limited to instances where Americans were directly threatened and there was a “near certainty” that no civilians would be killed.
If anything, Operation Protective Edge showed that Israel will not pull punches when it comes to combating terror.
Toward the end of Operation Protective Edge this past summer, the president was unusually vocal about Israel’s so-called disproportionate use of force and alleged lack of compliance with international humanitarian law.
There was no accompanying caption, but the cartoon could not help but feed the anti-Semitic canard that Israel was responsible for 9/11.
An accomplished Torah scholar and ardent adherent of Bobov chassidus, he was renowned for his self-effacing dedication and skills as an international lawyer and law professor
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/plenty-in-play-on-the-syrian-front/2013/05/08/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: