As Purim approaches, thousands of Israeli children and families grapple with poverty
We’ve been dismayed by some of the observations made concerning the Metropolitan Opera’s production of “The Death of Klinghoffer.” Defenders of the opera claim it is not at all anti-Semitic; a New York Times editorial blandly described it as a work “that gives voice to all sides in this terrible murder, but does not offer resolutions.”
In 1985 Leon Klinghoffer, a wheelchair-bound elderly American Jewish passenger on an Italian cruise ship, was shot and then thrown overboard by Palestinian terrorists who had commandeered the vessel in international waters.
There is no disputing that Mr. Klinghoffer was selected for execution because he was Jewish. So his murder in fact represents the ultimate expression of anti-Semitism. Yet the opera gives its Palestinian protagonists – the murderers – a platform to express their side of the story.
But can there be a conceivable Palestinian “side” to the cold-blooded murder of an American solely because he was Jewish? What does the killing of Leon Klinghoffer have to do with any notion of Palestinian victimhood? How can the opera not be deemed anti-Semitic?
More fundamentally, why would it occur to the opera’s composer to choose the murder of an American Jew by Palestinian terrorists as a vehicle to make points about Israeli policies vis-à-vis the Palestinians? And why would the Metropolitan Opera cooperate with him in that effort?
The controversy over the opera is not new. The production debuted back in 1991 and immediately drew criticism for its rank effort to draw a moral equivalency between terrorists and their victims. When Lisa and Ilsa Klinghoffer, the daughters of Leon Klinghoffer, saw the opera at the Brooklyn Academy of Music in 1991, they angrily denounced it. Last week the women made it clear the passage of time had not softened their view, saying in a statement released by the Anti-Defamation League that the work “perverts the terrorist murder of our father and attempts to romanticize, rationalize, legitimize and explain it.”
About the Author:
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Comments are closed.
Many Jews oppose the speech fearing it will further erode relations between Israel & US. I disagree.
The University of Georgia Student Government Association called for more investment in Israel.
Without an alliance comparable to ISIS, Al Qaida & Iran, militant Islam will conquer the Middle East
Netanyahu addresses a clear, present & lethal threat to the US/Israel/WORLD; NOT political bickering
Buried in the tax-returns of the JCF is millions of dollars funneled to NIF in the last few years.
Bibi’s speech to Congress will bring respect and honor to the Jewish Nation from the US & the world
Obama & Putin have handwriting/signature clues indicating differences between public & private life
It’s time for a new Jewish policy regarding Ramallah, NOT just because of the yarmulke incident
“GETT’s” being screened for Israeli Rabbinical Court judges at their annual convention.
If Jackson were alive he’d denounce Democratic party’s silence towards virulent anti-Semitism
Victim of Palestinian Arab terrorism, a victor in NY federal court, after years of being ignored by Justice Dept.
March 2013: Arabs hurled stones hitting the Biton’s car; Adele’s mother swerved the car-into a truck
I can tell you that Cablevision has been astonished at how high we rank.
The real issue is that in many respects the president has sought to recalibrate American values and our system of government.
Gone are the days when an anchorman sitting in a New York studio could, after sharing 22 minutes of carefully selected and edited news items, trumpet in stentorian tones, “And that’s the way it is.” No it wasn’t. It never was.
President Obama has frequently cautioned that Americans should take great care to avoid fomenting anti-Muslim passions in our reaction to the murderous activities regularly being perpetrated by terrorists in the name of Islam. One wonders why, though, he seems to have no concern with the potential for anti-Semitic fallout from his full-court press against Israeli […]
Typical of the administration’s milquetoast approach is the lack of any call for a substantial increase in military resources in order to crush ISIL, only a tepid mention of the need to “ultimately defeat” it.
He spent the first leg of his daylong visit to the French capital at Hyper Cacher.
In this particular case, the issue was whether the Arkansas prison system could prohibit, for security reasons, a devout Muslim’s maintaining a beard of a certain length as a matter of religious practice.
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/questions-linger-about-the-met-and-the-death-of-klinghoffer/2014/06/25/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: