web analytics
January 30, 2015 / 10 Shevat, 5775
 
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Reconsidering Iran Policy

Much attention has properly been paid to the problems inherent in the provisions of the Geneva agreement struck with Iran. There are substantial loopholes that allow Iran to run trucks through its commitments and Iran seems to have been able to blunt the full court press that had been mounted against it in the form of economic sanctions and threats of military force. Thus, despite UN resolutions calling for the elimination of Iran’s nuclear capacity, there is now primarily talk only of containing and regulating it. And while the Geneva agreement was initially said to call for relaxation of sanctions to the tune of approximately $4-$5 billion pending further discussions, it is now widely thought to be more than two times that amount.

But, as serious as these concerns are, there is also the matter of the process having perversely cast Iran as a major international player, contending on an equal basis with the major powers. Despite the fact that the Geneva conference was initially portrayed as Iran being called to the woodshed, the Iranians have deftly taken the air out of the anti-Iran united front; kicked any confrontation up the road; all but eliminated the threat of joint military action against them by the major powers or by Israel acting on its own; secured international acknowledgment of their right to continue to enrich uranium; and undermined the sanction regime – perhaps fatally so.

It has also created fissures among the major powers and caused consternation in the ranks of America’s allies as to U.S. reliability by highlighting President Obama’s penchant for ignoring his own “red lines.” And it has effectively given a pass to Iran for its support of terror around the world.

Moreover, Iran has emerged as a diplomatic force, providing its own self-serving interpretation of the language in the agreement without drawing rebuke from the U.S. and even temporarily pulling out of the negotiations because of alleged U.S. violations of the agreement before making a public show of returning as a magnanimous gesture to peace.

It is no secret that Israel has taken a profound lesson from the Geneva agreement. Indeed, Itamar Rabinovich, a former Israeli ambassador to the United States, said at a recent session of the World Policy Conference that after President Obama declined to strike Syria despite conclusive evidence of the Assad regime’s use of poison gas, neither Israel nor Iran believe any longer that the U.S. would use military force against Tehran.

A key casualty in all of this has been the relationship between the United States and Saudi Arabia. In fact, that special relationship has been an important part of American policy for decades and it has now plainly been undermined. Prince Turki al Faisal, a former Saudi intelligence chief now serving as a spokesman for the Saudi government, told the World Policy Conference that his country lacked confidence in the U.S. because of its failure to follow through on Syria and the implications of the Geneva agreement. He said the growth of Iranian power in the Gulf is viewed by Saudi Arabia as a threat to its security and complained that the U.S. seems bent on withdrawing inward.

Plainly, a mistake was made early on in treating Iran as a full negotiating partner. What should have been a process built around Iran’s being instructed as to the major powers’ fundamentally unalterable demands became one largely granting legitimacy to Iran’s basic position, though subjecting it to various adjustments.

An Iran with nuclear weapons is one of the great issues of our time with geopolitical implications of the highest order. America’s role in the world is another. We still cling to some hope that this president, perhaps with nudging by Congress, will be up to the task and stem the unraveling of longstanding international alliances and understandings now underway.

About the Author:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Reconsidering Iran Policy”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Photo of Al Qaeda founder and former leader, Osama Bin Laden, seen above a Palestinian Authority flag.
Shin Bet Sting Nabs Israeli Arabs Joining Al Qaeda, ISIS
Latest Indepth Stories
Israeli-flag

At some point we need to stop simply defending and promoting Israel and start living in Israel

Rabbi Berel Wein

“We Jews are the only people who when we drop a book on the floor pick it up and kiss it.”

Rabbi Sholom Klass

Though Zaide was the publisher of The Jewish Press, a big newspaper,I always remember him learning

Sheldon Silver

Speaker Silver has been an extraordinary public servant since his election to the Assembly in 1975 and has been an exemplary leader of that body since 1994.

He spent the first leg of his daylong visit to the French capital at Hyper Cacher.

Drawing Congress into the Iran nuclear debate is the last thing the White House wants.

Great leaders like Miriam and like Sarah Schenirer possess the capacity to challenge the status quo that confronts them.

Obama’s foreign policy is viewed by both liberals and conservatives as deeply flawed

Many journalists are covertly blaming the Charlie Hebdo writers themselves through self-censorship.

Why does the Times relay different motivations and narratives for jihadists in Europe and Israel?

To defeat parasites-the hosts of terrorists-we need to deny them new people, potential terrorists

Combating Amalek doesn’t mean all who disagree with you is evil-rather whom to follow and to oppose

Desperate people take what they can, seizing opportunity to advance their main goal; the Arabs don’t

There was a glaring void in the President’s State of the Union speech: Israel.

More Articles from Editorial Board

He spent the first leg of his daylong visit to the French capital at Hyper Cacher.

In this particular case, the issue was whether the Arkansas prison system could prohibit, for security reasons, a devout Muslim’s maintaining a beard of a certain length as a matter of religious practice.

According to Natan Sharansky, director of the Jewish Agency for Israel, France was the largest source of Jewish emigration to Israel last year and he believes as many as 15,000 French Jews may make aliyah in 2015.

Despite the president’s respectable anti-terrorism record, he doubtless has little interest in being identified with anything that might suggest, however tangentially, criticism of Muslims or Islam.

One wonders what connection that rejection has with turning to the ICC, which would allow the Palestinians to bring war-crime charges against individual Israelis and is certainly one more step away from seeking a negotiated settlement.

In the NPR interview, Mr. Obama said Iran could become a “very successful regional power” if it agreed to a long-term nuclear deal.

Thus, despite the increasingly serious problems for the mayor arising out of the current anti-police protests, Mr. de Blasio apparently will be cut no slack by those who seem to be aiming for a significant role in running the city from the streets and who will do whatever they can to prevent their momentum from ebbing.

Despite strong pressure to throw the book at the accused, Mr. Thompson allowed him to plead guilty to assault.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/reconsidering-iran-policy/2013/12/18/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: