As Purim approaches, thousands of Israeli children and families grapple with poverty
Last week, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a celebrated challenge by Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. to the Affordable Care Act, popularly known as Obamacare. At issue is whether closely held for-profit corporations like Hobby Lobby – owned by a religious Christian family that opposes several forms of contraception on religious grounds – can claim a religious exemption under federal law from the so-called contraceptive coverage mandate in Obamacare based on the religious beliefs of the corporation’s principals.
The Department of Justice acknowledges that individuals can claim an exemption if they can demonstrate an adverse impact on their religious beliefs. However, the department maintains that if they choose to do business in a corporate form, a common practice in order to provide a limit on financial liability, individuals cannot make that claim on the theory that a corporation, as a legal fiction, can have no religious scruples.
In late January, The Jewish Press reported that COLPA, the National Jewish Commission on Law and Public Affairs, had submitted a friend-of-the court brief, authored by the prominent constitutional lawyer Nathan Lewin on behalf of seven major national Orthodox Jewish organizations, advising the court that if the government’s position were sustained, “observances of American Jews may be significantly curtailed.”
The brief explained that Americans who observe Jewish ritual laws, which often are at odds with standard societal practices, not infrequently operate individual or family-owned businesses and incorporate for financial security. Since Jewish law does not distinguish between individual and corporate business form for purposes of religious practice, general government regulation could create a particular dilemma for observant business owners if they are not able to claim the right to an accommodation.
Interestingly, this issue was front and center in the argument before the Court. Justices Samuel Alito and Stephen Breyer focused on the problems that would face kosher slaughterhouses that are operated as corporations. Federal and state humane slaughter laws require that an animal be stunned before the throat is cut in order to limit the pain felt by the animal. There are built-in exceptions for Jewish ritual slaughter, which requires that the animal be fully conscious, and Justices Alito and Breyer raised questions as to whether the Department of Justice’s position would in effect put kosher slaughterers out of business, since, as corporations, they could not invoke an exemption based on the religious beliefs of the owners.
A decision is expected by June. It should have a lot to say about the kinds of accommodations the law will henceforth provide for us as we navigate the intersection between our ritual requirements and standard societal practices.
About the Author:
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Comments are closed.
Many Jews oppose the speech fearing it will further erode relations between Israel & US. I disagree.
The University of Georgia Student Government Association called for more investment in Israel.
Without an alliance comparable to ISIS, Al Qaida & Iran, militant Islam will conquer the Middle East
Netanyahu addresses a clear, present & lethal threat to the US/Israel/WORLD; NOT political bickering
Buried in the tax-returns of the JCF is millions of dollars funneled to NIF in the last few years.
Bibi’s speech to Congress will bring respect and honor to the Jewish Nation from the US & the world
Obama & Putin have handwriting/signature clues indicating differences between public & private life
It’s time for a new Jewish policy regarding Ramallah, NOT just because of the yarmulke incident
“GETT’s” being screened for Israeli Rabbinical Court judges at their annual convention.
If Jackson were alive he’d denounce Democratic party’s silence towards virulent anti-Semitism
Victim of Palestinian Arab terrorism, a victor in NY federal court, after years of being ignored by Justice Dept.
March 2013: Arabs hurled stones hitting the Biton’s car; Adele’s mother swerved the car-into a truck
I can tell you that Cablevision has been astonished at how high we rank.
The real issue is that in many respects the president has sought to recalibrate American values and our system of government.
Gone are the days when an anchorman sitting in a New York studio could, after sharing 22 minutes of carefully selected and edited news items, trumpet in stentorian tones, “And that’s the way it is.” No it wasn’t. It never was.
President Obama has frequently cautioned that Americans should take great care to avoid fomenting anti-Muslim passions in our reaction to the murderous activities regularly being perpetrated by terrorists in the name of Islam. One wonders why, though, he seems to have no concern with the potential for anti-Semitic fallout from his full-court press against Israeli […]
Typical of the administration’s milquetoast approach is the lack of any call for a substantial increase in military resources in order to crush ISIL, only a tepid mention of the need to “ultimately defeat” it.
He spent the first leg of his daylong visit to the French capital at Hyper Cacher.
In this particular case, the issue was whether the Arkansas prison system could prohibit, for security reasons, a devout Muslim’s maintaining a beard of a certain length as a matter of religious practice.
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/the-hobby-lobby-case/2014/04/02/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: