Congratulations to all the winners of the JewishPress.com raffle at The Event
As it now appears, the jury did not hold Lemrick Nelson responsible for the death of Yankel Rosenbaum, even though they convicted Nelson of stabbing him, because “everybody knew” that the Rosenbaum family has filed a lawsuit against the hospital, claiming he died because of inadequate post-stabbing care. This is what the jury forewoman told The New York Times. She went on to observe, “How can you hold two people responsible for the same death?” It also seems from The Times report that the jury forewoman came by her knowledge of the lawsuit through her employment at the hospital.
Without question, because Nelson put him in a life-threatening situation by stabbing him, as a legal matter, the hospital’s alleged subsequent negligence is irrelevant to Nelson’s culpability for Yankel Rosenbaum’s death. Indeed, the presiding judge in the case refused to allow evidence of the charges against the hospital. The result, though, was that the issue, which obviously was known to the jurors, was not squarely addressed and possibly countered.
In retrospect, and purely with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight, it would seem that the prudent thing would have been for the prosecution to have supported the introduction of evidence of the lawsuit and have the issue of the lawsuit squarely before the jury together with a “full court press” as to its irrelevance. The lawsuit was big news at the time it was commenced and that is the sort of thing that lingers in people’s mind in high profile matters.
We mean this not as a criticism of the prosecution team since we would have, if asked, probably have instinctively weighed in against giving the jury a basis for giving Nelson a pass, certainly in such a sharply adversarial context. However, we do admit to being puzzled that given her employment history, the jury forewoman was on the jury.
In any event, we think that there is an important object lesson here. There doubtless would have been a public outcry in the Jewish community had any stone been left unturned in the effort to keep evidence of the lawsuit from getting to the jury. One’s position on the issue would have become a litmus test for sensitivity to Jewish interests. Yet whether or not it actually applies in the Lemrick Nelson case, the old adage of discretion sometimes being the better part of valor comes to mind.
About the Author:
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Comments are closed.
“these soldiers are on the front lines of a war that the entire world is fighting”
Hayovel’s vision: to share with them (Jews) a passion for the soon coming jubilee in yeshua messiah.”
Dalai Lama: In the interest of Tibetans today to have peaceful co-existence with the Chinese.
The War projects to lower Israel’s 2014 GDP 0.5% but will have little influence on foreign investors
It is in the nature of the Nations of the World to be hostile towards the Jewish People.
Hamas and Islamic Jihad are actually fighting to “liberate Jerusalem and all Palestine.”
The bad news is that ISIS and Al Qaeda are on the Syrian Golan. The good news is that every terrorist in Syria is killing each other.
The congregants, Ethiopians spanning generations, were beaming with joy and pride.
The withdrawal from the Gaza Strip nine years ago did not enhance Israel’s security.
How does a soldier from a religious home fall in love with a soldier from a non- religious kibbutz?
In 19th century entire ancient Jewish communities fled Palestine to escape brutal Muslim authorities
Responsibility lies with both the UN and Hamas, and better commitments should have been demanded from both parties in the ceasefire.
But the world is forever challenging our Jewish principle and our practices.
If this is how we play the game, we will lose. By that I mean we will lose everything.
Reportedly, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates have formed a bloc that seeks to counter Islamist influence in the Middle East.
And why would the U.S. align itself on these issues with Turkey and Qatar, longtime advocates of Hamas’s interests?
Several years ago the city concluded that the metzitzah b’peh procedure created unacceptable risks for newborns in terms of the transmission of neo-natal herpes through contact with a mohel carrying the herpes virus.
Hamas has coupled its ideological intolerance of the existence of Israel with numerous terrorist attacks and rocket launchings.
Since nothing is static in warfare, the lesson is clear: Iron Dome must be continuously improved to stay ahead of developments in any rocket technology Hamas and Israel’s other enemies might get their hands on.
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/the-lemrick-nelson-verdict/2003/06/27/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: