Close your eyes, breathe in deeply, now exhale slowly… That was easy, wasn’t it? Not for everyone…
As it now appears, the jury did not hold Lemrick Nelson responsible for the death of Yankel Rosenbaum, even though they convicted Nelson of stabbing him, because “everybody knew” that the Rosenbaum family has filed a lawsuit against the hospital, claiming he died because of inadequate post-stabbing care. This is what the jury forewoman told The New York Times. She went on to observe, “How can you hold two people responsible for the same death?” It also seems from The Times report that the jury forewoman came by her knowledge of the lawsuit through her employment at the hospital.
Without question, because Nelson put him in a life-threatening situation by stabbing him, as a legal matter, the hospital’s alleged subsequent negligence is irrelevant to Nelson’s culpability for Yankel Rosenbaum’s death. Indeed, the presiding judge in the case refused to allow evidence of the charges against the hospital. The result, though, was that the issue, which obviously was known to the jurors, was not squarely addressed and possibly countered.
In retrospect, and purely with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight, it would seem that the prudent thing would have been for the prosecution to have supported the introduction of evidence of the lawsuit and have the issue of the lawsuit squarely before the jury together with a “full court press” as to its irrelevance. The lawsuit was big news at the time it was commenced and that is the sort of thing that lingers in people’s mind in high profile matters.
We mean this not as a criticism of the prosecution team since we would have, if asked, probably have instinctively weighed in against giving the jury a basis for giving Nelson a pass, certainly in such a sharply adversarial context. However, we do admit to being puzzled that given her employment history, the jury forewoman was on the jury.
In any event, we think that there is an important object lesson here. There doubtless would have been a public outcry in the Jewish community had any stone been left unturned in the effort to keep evidence of the lawsuit from getting to the jury. One’s position on the issue would have become a litmus test for sensitivity to Jewish interests. Yet whether or not it actually applies in the Lemrick Nelson case, the old adage of discretion sometimes being the better part of valor comes to mind.
About the Author:
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Comments are closed.
Aside from my own 485-page tome on the subject, Red Army, I think Jamie Glazov did an excellent job at framing things in United in Hate: The Left’s Romance with Tyranny and Terror.
Who said Kerry won no concessions from Iran? He secured pistachios and Beluga caviar for America!
In 2015, Israel’s fertility rate (3+ births per woman) is higher than all Arab countries except 3
I sought a Muslim group that claims to preach a peaceful and accepting posture of Islam, Ahmadiyya
While Orthodox men are encouraged to achieve and celebrated for it, Orthodox women too often are not
Jonathan remember, as long as you’re denied your right to come home to Israel you’re still in prison
Reports of a dead baby, a devastated family, and indications of a gloating attacker.
“Yesha” and Binyamin Regional Council leaders said the attack “is not the path of Jews in Judea and Samaria.”
The occasion? The rarely performed mitzvah of pidyon peter chamor: Redemption of a firstborn donkey.
American leftists have a pathological self-inflicted blindness to the dangers of political Islam
Hillary should THANK Trump; By dominating the news he’s overshadowed the implosion of her campaign
Hard to remember when Jewish youth were so hostile to their heritage as they are on campuses today.
Names of the enablers of Iran’s Nuclear weapons will be added next to Hitler’s on the list of infamy
The next day, in a speech in New York to the Council on Foreign Relations, Mr. Kerry substantially upped the ante.
Mr. Silver’s legislation changed the primary date to April 19, which avoids any conflict. And, we are happy to say, he received the support of Republicans in the legislature for changing the date.
The issue of the Chief Rabbinate’s control over conversions and other life-cycle matters has long been a contentious one.
Can adoption agencies limit the placement of children to heterosexual couples only?
The court’s finding that the president has exclusive jurisdiction in recognizing foreign countries might have been be apt if the issue at hand were a congressional attempt to grant recognition to “Palestine” as a state.
It wasn’t too long ago that Mr. Erdogan, in his determination to burnish Turkey’s credentials as an Islamist state at the cost of the secularism that had brought much economic and political success to Turkey, upended his country’s decades-long cooperative relationship with Israel.
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/the-lemrick-nelson-verdict/2003/06/27/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: