Warning: session_start(): open(/var/www/tmp/sess_aks0oaaiblfh125it1ha2std75, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/wp-masquerade/masquerade.php on line 61
The Jewish Press » » The Police Commissioner And ‘The Third Jihad’
May 3, 2016 / 25 Nisan, 5776
InDepth
Sponsored Post


The Police Commissioner And ‘The Third Jihad’


The current controversy surrounding the film “The Third Jihad” is ostensibly over the propriety of the NYPD’s airing it as part of in a training program. In reality it is the continuation of a broad and continuing effort to discredit any investigation of the growth of Muslim radicalism in New York. And as usual, The New York Times is right up front with Muslim organizations in voicing outrage.

We doubt Commissioner Kelly will heed the calls from some Muslim quarters that he resign over the issue. But we would do well to appreciate that the future intimidation of decision-makers charged with providing for our safety is not an idle concern. A New York Times editorial on the issue last week, entitled, “Hateful Film” is instructive:

There is absolutely no excuse for the New York Police Department’s decision to show a hateful film about Muslims to more than 1,400 city police officers.

Relations between police and the diverse Muslim community are already tense after the Associated Press uncovered aggressive surveillance of Muslims, including American citizens. The propaganda of this film will only damage those relations further and make law enforcement more difficult.

And, finally, we are told – without any elaboration – that the film “was financed by the conservative Clarion Fund.”

So for the Times, the primary issue is whether the Muslim community likes the idea of a police force tasked with defending against Muslim terrorism taking its job seriously. Indeed, the Times editorial said absolutely nothing about the training value of the film in thwarting terror – not, apparently, out of deference to the expertise of the NYPD in this regard. Indeed, it was not sheepish about voicing an opinion about its views on what will make law enforcement more difficult.

But we find it incredible that while the Times does not address the issue of the film’s factual presentations, it does say “The film shows some of the grisliest jihadist terrorists in recent years and argues that the real agenda for Islamists in America is to infiltrate and dominate the country.”

The Times apparently accepts the validity of the factual presentations but seems to have a problem with the context. The editorial doubtless was informed by a column on the movie by Times regular Michael Powell that appeared the day before. Here is some of what he wrote:

Ominous music plays as images appear on the screen: Muslim terrorists shoot Christians in the head, car bombs explode, executed children lie covered by sheets and a doctored photograph shows an Islamic flag flying over the White House.

“This is the true agenda of much of Islam in America,” a narrator intones. “A strategy to infiltrate and dominate America.… This is the war you don’t know about.”

This is the feature-length film titled “The Third Jihad,” paid for by a nonprofit group, which was shown to more than a thousand officers as part of training in the New York Police Department….

The 72-minute film was financed by the Clarion Fund, nonprofit group whose board includes a former Central Intelligence Agency official and a deputy defense secretary for President Ronald Reagan. Its previous documentary attacking Muslims’ “war on the West” attracted support from the casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, a major supporter of Israel who has helped to reshape the Republican presidential primary by pouring millions of dollars into a so-called super PAC that backs Newt Gingrich….

Repeated calls over the past days to the Clarion Fund, which is based in New York, were not answered. The nonprofit group shares officials with Aish HaTorah, an Israeli organization whose officials have opposed a full return of the West Bank to Palestinians. The producer of “The Third Jihad,” Raphael Shore, also works with Aish HaTorah.

Clarion’s financing is a puzzle. Its federal income tax forms show contributions, grants and revenues typically hover around $1 million annually – except in 2008, when it booked contributions of $18.3 million. That same year, Clarion produced “Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against the West.” The Clarion Fund used its surge in contributions to pay to distribute tens of millions of copies of this DVD in swing electoral states across the country in September 2008.

We note that both the editorial and Mr. Powell’s piece are significantly in error as regards the film narrator’s comment about the agenda of Islam in America. While the editorial paraphrased the narrator as saying “the real agenda for Islamists in America is to infiltrate and dominate the country” and Mr. Powell reported the quote as “This is the true agenda of much of Islam in America…,” the actual comment in the film spoke of “the true agenda of much of Muslim leadership here in America.” Also, the film opens with the text: “This is not a film about Islam. It is about the threat of radical Islam. Only a small percentage of the world’s 1.3 billion Muslims are radical.”

If there were any doubt about what the Times is about, consider what Mr. Powell wrote this week in a column about a sparsely attended demonstration by “a few dozen Muslim New Yorkers” who had gathered to protest the NYPD’s use of the film. Noting that no politicians or elected were present, he opined, without any corroboration, that “[s]uch isolation no doubt counts as a success for the deep-pocketed backers of the video, ‘The Third Jihad,’ who apparently hope to tar Muslim leaders as ‘radical Islamists’ and so render them politically toxic.”

It will be recalled that several months ago Congressman Peter King was savaged by the Times as well as some of the same Islamic organizations over his hearings designed to pursue the question of the role of mosques in the recruitment of home grown fundamentalist terrorists. Just a few weeks ago there was a similar targeting of the NYPD for its connection to a CIA anti-terror monitoring effort.

As we see it, the jihad film controversy is just the latest episode in a calculated attempt to delegitimize efforts to deal with a serious threat the larger Muslim community recognizes but is unwilling to address. We acknowledge that an unwelcome broad focus and somewhat unconventional methods are uncomfortable, but something has to be done and such efforts cannot simply be summarily dismissed.

We wonder why the Times – which seems to have no problem casting vague aspersions on possible Jewish and pro-Israel connections with parochial agendas as driving anti-terrorist efforts – ignores the recurrent involvement of several Muslim organizations out front in opposition to those efforts.

Editorial Board

About the Author:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “The Police Commissioner And ‘The Third Jihad’”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (L) and Education Minister Naftali Bennett
Analysis: Bennett Threatening to Walk If Bibi Gives Shaked’s Justice Portfolio to Bougie
Latest Indepth Stories
israeli-american flags

“Israel constitutes the largest US aircraft carrier, which does not require a single US boot on board, cannot be sunk, deployed in a most critical region to the US economy and national security. “

Richard Cravatts

It has never been the function of academic free speech to protect or promote irresponsible, inaccurate, or deranged speech-yet anti-Semitic speech of this kind apparently is

Golub-042916

Pro-Israel Jewish Democrats have little hope to find in the words of Sanders OR Clinton.

MK Moshe-Feiglin

The elimination of the Hevron terrorist rectified the horrible moral distortion of the 6 immoral minutes he remained alive after being ‘neutralized’

The more the radical Left loses its grip on public opinion, the more it attempts to thwart the will of the Israeli public.

Hamner’s 2 shows -The Walton’s and Falcon Crest-serve as indications of a certain negative transition in American culture.

Obama has used both congressional majorities and minorities to thwart Republicans in Congress all the while attacking them

Liberals define freedom as “doing as we please,” in tandem with liberty from the demands of a religious life.

13 years ago, Lt. Daniel Mandel, of the Nahal Brigade, was murdered by a terrorist. Today, there are 18 babies who have been named Daniel, after him.

The strong likelihood that prosecutors violated the plea agreement didn’t matter.

There is a whole other transcendental level of delight, enchantment, and reverence that applies to collectors of Judaica documents.

By its denial of truth, unrestrained Liberalism generates nihilism, undermining any normative understanding of Islamic terrorism,

Isn’t it remarkable how the entire world can cooperate against Zionism, when it can’t cooperate on almost anything else?!

More Articles from Editorial Board
Jonathan Pollard

The strong likelihood that prosecutors violated the plea agreement didn’t matter.

JewishPress Logo

This form of preachiness is unknown in the ordinary interactions of nations but has become quite de rigueur when American officials come down hard on their Israeli counterparts.

Where would the IDF direct its fire if not at the sites of the missile launchers?

It has long been clear that Mr. Obama feels frustrated for not having resolved the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians.

Significantly, at the time of his detention Israel was under extreme international pressure to show that it was serious about responding to Jewish attacks against Palestinians.

“Have we lost our minds?” asked Bennett. “We are at war. War against vicious terrorism.”

The ability of relatively marginal groups bent on destruction to project their power is unprecedented.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/the-police-commissioner-and-the-third-jihad/2012/02/01/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online:





Warning: Unknown: open(/var/www/tmp/sess_aks0oaaiblfh125it1ha2std75, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0

Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/var/www/tmp) in Unknown on line 0