web analytics
May 23, 2013 /14 Sivan, 5773
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
The Tosfos Yomtov was convinced that the death of 300,000 –600,000 Jews during the Chmielnicki massacres of 1648-49 were because of improper Tefila. Communicated: Tefilla

Chillul Tefila Bifarhesia, as well as halachicly challenged verbiage and dress, are external manifestations of a critical lack of personal yiras shomayim which has lethal consequences.



The Pollard Petition

tell a friend
Jonathan-Pollard-050412

The Jewish Press urges readers to sign a circulating petition that calls on Shimon Peres to do all he can, in advance of accepting the Presidential Medal of Freedom from President Obama, to persuade Mr. Obama to free Jonathan Pollard, the Israeli spy serving a life sentence in a federal prison. (President Obama announced last month that he would be awarding the Medal to Mr. Peres, the president of Israel, in June.)

The petition appears in Hebrew (the project began in Israel, but there is also an accompanying English version) and can be joined by logging on to JonathanPollard.org.

Although Mr. Peres sent a letter to President Obama requesting Mr. Pollard’s release, to this point no such action has been taken. And supporters of Mr. Pollard note the incongruity of the Israeli statesman accepting an award from the American president while Mr. Pollard continues to languish in an American jail under a sentence denounced as draconian and excessive by dozens of former American officials.

We have long felt, and emerging evidence seems to confirm, that Jonathan Pollard’s extraordinary life sentence resulted in no small measure from his having spied for Israel, which though a close ally of the U.S. was anathema to some senior officials in the Reagan administration, particularly then-Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger, and several members of the intelligence community. So it cannot be that Pollard’s plight should not somehow resonate when Israel’s president receives the highest U.S. civilian award – especially given that it was Mr. Peres who happened to be the prime minister of Israel when Mr. Pollard was apprehended.

What role the Israeli president can play here is not clear. But it merits mentioning that in announcing the honor to be bestowed on Mr. Peres, President Obama pointed to the 89-year-old statesman’s long career as one of the architects of modern Israel and his great diplomatic skills. “He has taught us to ask more of ourselves, and to empathize more with our fellow human beings,” said Mr. Obama.

If enough of us sign that online petition, perhaps Mr. Peres might just feel empowered enough to use those diplomatic skills to persuade President Obama to empathize with – and release – Jonathan Pollard.

tell a friend

About the Author:


You might also be interested in:


no comments

You must log in to post a comment.

No Responses to “The Pollard Petition”

  1. Daniel J. Dulnikowski says:

    As an American, Pollard can rot in prison until he is dead.

    • Matthew Huck says:

      As an American Jew, amen. I can't believe the Jewish/Israeli clamor for Pollard's release when the record shows that he would have sold Israel's secrets if he had had access to them. The guy regarded his security clearance as a credit/debit card for which he would never have to pay.

  2. There is much about the Pollard case that never made sense but his guilt was never in question after the trial. He went to the Israeli Embassy in Washington, DC on Nov. 21, 1985 when he was not in U.S. custody but when he asked for aylum in Israel, the guards at the Embassy turned him away. Israel never admitted that it purchased the U.S. Navy classified documents from Pollard until 1998. The life sentence is not excessive given the crime, and Caspar Weinberger had no role in any sentence recommendation but his only role was to give prosecutors and Judge Robinson a damage assessment memorandum which was shared with Pollard and his attorneys. The prosecutor honored the plea agreement deal with Pollard and only recommended "a substantial number of years" for his sentence but Judge Robinson was not part of the deal and he imposed the life sentence as was common in other espionage cases. Pollard was born an American citizen and he has been treated humanely and not unjustly for the nature and scope of his crimes against America and the damage they did to U.S. navy security in the 1980s. Pollard has now served 25 years which is a "substantial number" but any reduction in sentence should come from the U.S. judicial system in an orderly manner using standard due process and not from short cuts or arbitrary emotional negotiations of politicians. Done in the right way, I think Pollard's attorneys could get credit for time served and a reduction in sentence from the courts. But going the route of an executive pardon from any president is not the right approach in my opinion until or unless all court appeals have been exhausted not to absolve the crimes he was guilty of but to reduce the sentence which is the only real issue at this point.

    • Mr Rhoads, you are wrong from the very start of your comments. Jonathan Pollard never had a trial. The judge threw out the plea agreement because of whatever Caspar Weinberger told him, all of which has never been revealed, not even to Jonathan's lawyers. The life sentence that judge Robinson imposed was anything but common as the median sentence for passing classified documents to an ally (the only crime Jonathan was ever charged with) was 2 to 4 years. Jonathan's sentence is unprecedented. Jonathan has not been treated humanely. You call years of solitary confinement and denial of medical treatment humane!? As for the damage done to America by the information that Jonathan passed to Israel, there I can't argue with you. America's had some serious mud on its face because they were in breach of the treaty they had with Israel and should have been sending them that information and more. No damage was done to America by Jonathan except for showing up the state department and the anti Semites that run it. As for the judicial system, it wrote Jonathan off years ago. Jonathan could not even get a "new trial" (hard for it to be new since he never had an "old" one) because his first incompetent lawyer failed to file for one within the time limit of his sentencing. Every petition to the courts has been rejected on some technicality or another. Jonathan's current lawyers have exhausted every legal option and hit a brick wall each time. The only thing left is clemency from the President of the United States. Let's be clear, Jonathan is not asking for a pardon, all he is asking is for his sentence to be reduced to time served. Many high ranking US government officials have already stated that Jonathan should have been released years ago. Even Caspar Weinberger, before he died said "As I say, the Pollard matter was comparatively minor. It was made far bigger than its actual importance." Jonathan's sentence was and remains political punishment, period. I suggest you do a little more research and get your facts straight.

  3. If Shimon Peres had any shred of decency, he would refuse to accept the award unless Pollard is released!

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Peter Bouckaert, emergencies director of Human Rights Watch, having lunch. Peter likes long walks on the beach with fellow "insider" correspondents and dumping on Israel.
Yes, There Is an Anti-Israel Media Cabal and They All Meet on Facebook
Latest Indepth Stories
Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas has said he will never recognize a Jewish state and there will be no Jews allowed in a Palestinian State.

parently an affront to J Street’s worldview, the focus of which appears to be the creation of a Palestinian State, whether or not that will bring peace.

Moshe-Feiglin-022213

The importance of the caucus on organ harvesting in China, sponsored recently by the Liberal Lobby in the Knesset, cannot be exaggerated. On the surface, the caucus’s topic seems odd. Knesset members and other VIPs were called together to discuss horrors being perpetrated by the Communist regime in China against what the government there calls “regime opponents.”

Shurin-Dov

My mother, the eldest daughter of Reb Yaakov Kamenetsky, zt”l, was niftar last month at the age of 92. She took her last breath in her home in Efrat, Israel, next door to the shul that was my father’s for 24 years before his passing in 2007.

Following the Boston Marathon bombing, one crucial point will likely remain overlooked. The most loathsome aspect of this or any other terror bombing attack on civilians will always lie in the inexpressibility of physical pain. While all decent people will abhor the idea of bombs expressly directed at the innocent, whether here or in other countries, none will ever be able to process the very deepest horrors of what has been inflicted.

It’s only natural to see increasing evidence of Jerusalem’s glorious Jewish past being unearthed, quite literally, under modern Israeli sovereignty. The new archaeological finds are also very timely – as the Arab onslaught attempting to detach Jerusalem from its Jewish roots gains steam, the facts on the ground, or “under” the ground, show quite otherwise.

The Talmud (Berachot 26b) says, “tefillot avot tiknum” – “prayer was established by the avot.” The Talmud then uses the following verse (Bereshit 19:27) to prove how Avraham established prayer: “Vayaskem Avraham baboker el hamakom asher amad sham et pnei Hashem” – “And Avraham got up early in the morning to the place where he had stood before God.”

Nearly 13 years ago, then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak journeyed to Camp David to end the conflict with the Palestinians. With the approval of President Clinton, he offered Yasir Arafat an independent Palestinian state in almost all of the West Bank, Gaza and in part of Jerusalem. Arafat said no.

The news that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative groups has brought renewed spotlight on a 2010 lawsuit filed by the pro-Israel group Z Street, which alleges it was also singled out by the IRS when applying for tax-exempt status.

In an editorial last week (“Circling the Wagons”) we noted the efforts by the administration and its supporters to dismiss allegations that the government’s spin on the Benghazi attack was designed to shield the president and that the IRS was improperly used to stifle opposition to Mr. Obama’s reelection.

As the controversies besetting the Obama administration continue to grow in number and intensity, the prospect that President Obama would seriously consider military action against Iran, should that country continue its drive to become a nuclear power, becomes more and more remote. So we welcome the current enhancement of sanctions against Iran on the federal and New York State levels.

To his parents’ friends, he was “Mrs. Greenberg’s disgrace,” but to sports fans he is one of the greatest – if not the greatest – Jewish baseball players of all time. Long before Sandy Koufax, Hank Greenberg excited Jewish sports fans with his prowess on the baseball diamond.

To eat is to live – to keep our physical bodies alive. For without the body, there is nothing. No experience. No memory. No joy and no hardship. But man, unlike animals, eats to live and to enjoy. So how should a Jew respond when he is challenged as to why he imposes upon himself not just ceremonies dedicated to the enjoyment of eating but even more to the limiting of what he can eat?

Neither Secretary of State Kerry nor the president he serves seem to understand Russia’s goals in the Middle East.

More Articles from Editorial Board

In an editorial last week (“Circling the Wagons”) we noted the efforts by the administration and its supporters to dismiss allegations that the government’s spin on the Benghazi attack was designed to shield the president and that the IRS was improperly used to stifle opposition to Mr. Obama’s reelection.

As the controversies besetting the Obama administration continue to grow in number and intensity, the prospect that President Obama would seriously consider military action against Iran, should that country continue its drive to become a nuclear power, becomes more and more remote. So we welcome the current enhancement of sanctions against Iran on the federal and New York State levels.

Two recent revelations have raised serious questions about the kind of government President Obama is running.

We were dismayed by the announcement last week from Google that it was changing the name “Palestinian Territories” to “Palestine” across its products. In explaining the action, a Google spokesman said that “We consult a number of sources and authorities when naming countries…. In this case, we are following the lead of the UN, ICANN (the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers), ISO (International Organization for Standardization) and other international organizations.”

It seems clear that there is a lot more to the current developments regarding Syria than Israel’s bombing some sites there, though staunching the flow of Iranian weapons to Hizbullah through Syria is plainly a significant objective.

Secretary of State John Kerry’s recent embrace of the Arab Peace Initiative is, to say the least, unnerving. Certainly the response of Arab leaders to his action reflects the dangers for Israel inherent in the plan. President Obama seems to be preoccupied these days with Syria and Iran as well as serious domestic issues and is largely leaving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to Mr. Kerry. But the secretary of state seems poised to roil things up without any prospect of real progress.

Syria’s civil war is fast becoming one of the Obama administration’s greatest foreign policy challenges, for the moment even surpassing Iran’s march toward nuclear weaponry in its urgency. Together, both issues have effectively derailed the president’s long-range intention to focus on Asia and the emerging economic and military developments in China and other nations in the so-called Asian Pivot.

The investigation into the Boston bombings is still in its early stages but what seems to be emerging is that the presumed perpetrators were not directly linked to any foreign terrorist infrastructure. Rather, they were individual Americans radicalized by jihadist teachings and guided in their weapons-making by jihadist websites.

    Latest Poll

    Which is the most beautiful location in Jerusalem?









    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/the-pollard-petition/2012/05/02/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online:

Close