In Israel, a new five month scholarship program being offered to young aspiring athletes – one of them could be you.
President Obama will finally follow up his June 4, 2009 visit to Cairo with one to Israel. Though he was just a stone’s throw from Israel at the time, he chose not to go the Jewish state and it is not too hard to figure out why.
Early on in his speech at Cairo University he pulled no punches: “I’ve come here to Cairo to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world….” The new president may not have meant his words to be understood this way, but many supporters of Israel saw them as sending a message that the longstanding U.S.-Israel relationship would be recalibrated to one extent or another in order to win the trust of Muslims.
In a sense, this inauspicious beginning soured Jewish and Israeli perceptions of Mr. Obama and created fear about his feelings toward the Jewish state.
In retrospect, at least, much of that fear appears to have been groundless; with the exception of his view on settlements (which at any rate dovetail pretty much with the views of prior U.S. presidents) and his at times testy personal relationship with Prime Minister Netanyahu, his administration has been supportive of Israel at the UN and other international forums, and U.S.-Israel military and intelligence ties are as robust as they’ve ever been.
But the old adage about first impressions has certainly held true here, and the suspicion with which Mr. Obama is viewed by many in the pro-Israel community is as palpable today as it was in 2009. Indeed, some are suggesting that the current trip is designed to address the problems created by the Cairo trip and speech.
One thing that stood out in the speech and which many saw as troubling was his characterization of the relationship between the United States and Israel:
America’s strong bonds with Israel are well known. This bond is unbreakable. It is based upon cultural and historical ties, and the recognition that the aspiration for a Jewish homeland is rooted in a tragic history that cannot be denied.
At first glance that statement might seem as nothing less than praiseworthy; here, after all, was an American president in the heart of the Muslim Middle East telling an Egyptian audience that the U.S.-Israel friendship is “unbreakable.” But what disturbed so many and set the alarm bells ringing was that, perhaps inadvertently, he was embracing the Arab narrative that Jews have no historical claims in the Middle East and the establishment of a Jewish state there was the result of Western guilt feelings and penance for the Holocaust.
Following his connecting the Holocaust with Israel, the president said:
On the other hand, it is also undeniable that the Palestinian people, Muslims and Christians, have suffered in pursuit of a homeland. For more than sixty years they have endured the pain of dislocation…. So let there be no doubt: the situation for the Palestinian people is intolerable.
So he seemed to be saying that while the Jews are artificial transplants to the region, the Palestinians are indigenous. Moreover, he seemed to equate the victimization of the Jews by the most ruthlessly efficient killing machine in history to the Palestinian experience under the dislocations and deprivations of Israeli occupation.
Of course, Mr. Obama, as noted above, has thus far come through for Israel both militarily and diplomatically for the better part of his presidency. Whether that can be attributed to political expediency or to a genuine appreciation for Israel and the U.S.-Israel relationship on Mr. Obama’s part remains to be seen.
Mr. Obama’s main challenge during this week’s visit will be to try to reverse the negative first impressions he created four years ago. Frankly, the fact that he has refused to visit such politically symbolic places as the Knesset is not encouraging. But he will be going to places that underscore the Jewish connection to the land such as the Shrine of the Book at the Israel Museum, which contains the ancient Dead Sea Scrolls that testify to Jewish life in the Middle East more than 2,000 years ago. He also plans to lay a wreath at the grave of Theodor Herzl, the founder of political Zionism.
About the Author:
You must log in to post a comment.
Ahmadinejad may plan to reveal proof that the 2009 elections were rigged if his candidate’s registration for presidential candidacy is not accepted.
With a ‘friend’ like Erdogan, Obama’s policy toward Syria, Iran, the advance of revolutionary Islamism, and the Israel-Palestinian “peace process,” is in serious trouble.
The media loved Obama, but it discovered early on that he did not love it back.
How far the PA will go to present the lie as the truth and the truth as a lie? Its claim that Jesus was a Palestinian is old hat. But now the “resurrection” also refers to “the Palestinian state.”
The progressive consolidation imagines that organization can contain the messier side of man.
The Russian Yakhont missiles already delivered to Syria threaten Israel Navy ships carrying out vital missions in the Mediterranean.
Islamism represents the transformation of Islamic faith into a political ideology.
America could be said to be building a united front against Iran, but at what price?
The Japanese do not feel the need to apologize to Muslims for the negative way in which they relate to Islam.
Palestinian youths from Hebron, though, who met with Israelis near Bethlehem to share their problems and insights have been forced to issue a statement distancing themselves from the meeting.
Benghazi isn’t likely to keep Hillary out of the Democratic field in 2016, but after 2008, she is justifiably paranoid.
The contractors received the land at a bargain basement price, moved the prices up to 1.8 million NIS and pocketed one million NIS per apartment.
Many of my fellow college students are quick to voice their acceptance of their LGBT friends, but they turn up their noses and frown slightly when they speak of a Hasid.
The growing revelations that the Obama State Department watered down public statements on the attack in order to cleanse them of any mention of al Qaeda and terrorism is a travesty.
We must confront Islamist groups with what Prime Minister David Cameron referred to as “muscular liberalism.”
Two recent revelations have raised serious questions about the kind of government President Obama is running.
We were dismayed by the announcement last week from Google that it was changing the name “Palestinian Territories” to “Palestine” across its products. In explaining the action, a Google spokesman said that “We consult a number of sources and authorities when naming countries…. In this case, we are following the lead of the UN, ICANN (the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers), ISO (International Organization for Standardization) and other international organizations.”
It seems clear that there is a lot more to the current developments regarding Syria than Israel’s bombing some sites there, though staunching the flow of Iranian weapons to Hizbullah through Syria is plainly a significant objective.
Secretary of State John Kerry’s recent embrace of the Arab Peace Initiative is, to say the least, unnerving. Certainly the response of Arab leaders to his action reflects the dangers for Israel inherent in the plan. President Obama seems to be preoccupied these days with Syria and Iran as well as serious domestic issues and is largely leaving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to Mr. Kerry. But the secretary of state seems poised to roil things up without any prospect of real progress.
Syria’s civil war is fast becoming one of the Obama administration’s greatest foreign policy challenges, for the moment even surpassing Iran’s march toward nuclear weaponry in its urgency. Together, both issues have effectively derailed the president’s long-range intention to focus on Asia and the emerging economic and military developments in China and other nations in the so-called Asian Pivot.
The investigation into the Boston bombings is still in its early stages but what seems to be emerging is that the presumed perpetrators were not directly linked to any foreign terrorist infrastructure. Rather, they were individual Americans radicalized by jihadist teachings and guided in their weapons-making by jihadist websites.
During the run-up to the confirmations of Secretary of State Kerry and Secretary of Defense Hagel, we and others forcefully challenged the latter over statements he had made about Iran and Israel, and were more favorably inclined toward the former.
This week Jews around the world celebrated Yom Ha’Atzmaut, Israel Independence Day. Sixty-five years ago on the day before the British mandate over Palestine was set to expire, the Jewish People’s Council, comprised of the political leadership of the Jewish residents of Palestine, proclaimed the establishment of the State of Israel.
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/the-presidents-trip/2013/03/20/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: