web analytics
May 6, 2015 / 17 Iyar, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


The Two Lists

The folks over at the American Jewish Congress say that the State Department's inclusion of Palestinian groups on its list of “Foreign Terrorist Organizations” should reassure Israel. They are dead wrong! Those organizations are not on the other, more important list the State Department issued last week. To be sure, U.S. citizens are prohibited from financially supporting groups on the Foreign Terrorist Organizations list and all U.S. financial institutions are required to freeze the assets under their control. But the other list, the one containing those organizations whose assets are not only to be frozen but also to be otherwise aggressively targeted internationally in the war against terrorism, does not include any Palestinian groups.

An AJCongress statement issued the other day said in part:

The release by the State Department today of a list of terrorist organizations which not only includes Osama bin Laden's Al-Qaeda organization, but Israel's deadly enemies ? Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and Hezbollah ? as well, should come as reassurance to Israel's Prime Minister Sharon that in the fight against terrorism being waged by the Bush Administration, Palestinian groups have neither been forgiven nor forgotten.

Yet the list issued last week of groups to be targeted for economic strangulation in order to dry up their resources and capacity to mount new terrorist acts, did not include Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and Hezbollah. The point is very simple. The assets of these particular groups ? whose immediate focus is on Israel ? will not be vigorously pursued and their capacity to kill Israelis will not thereby be undermined.

Not only is this an ominous encouraging message to those miscreants to continue their terror, it also undermines the entire effort itself. As the Associated Press reports, after meeting in Washington this past weekend the world's finance ministers and central bank governors ? from the so-called G-7 nations, namely, the United States, Japan, Germany, France, Britain, Italy and Canada ? issued a joint statement:

We stand united in our commitment to vigorously track down and intercept the assets of terrorists and to pursue the individuals and countries suspected of financing terrorists.

The G-7 ministers went on to say that they were encouraged by the number of other countries that have agreed to join in the effort to make it harder for terrorists to use the international financial system.

The G-7 also released a one-page action plan focusing on money laundering and announced they would soon meet to develop new policies to combat terrorist financing. “We are well on the way to building an international coalition to disrupt terrorist fund-raising,” U.S. Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill declared. French Finance Minister Laurent Faubus said pressure had to be applied to make all countries comply with whatever standards are developed. Britain's Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown said, “We must act to cut off the finances that are the lifeblood of terrorism.”

It seems downright perverse that because it is in a selective context, the more vocal the G-7 nations are in their calls for action, the more they will serve to encourage terror.

And with the notorious symbiotic relationship between Al-Qaeda and the Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Hezbollah groups, the notion of an effective plan against the former without bringing the latter into the net becomes laughable. Indeed, many of the same countries that support Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Hezbollah will be free to funnel funds to them as long as they eschew direct payments to Al Qaeda!

Underscoring the political nature of the State Department “listing” process, it is to be noted that the Japanese Red Army and the Tupac Amaru Revolutionary Movement were dropped from its latest list of designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations.

The reason, reportedly, is that as the list is reviewed every two years and these groups have not committed any terrorist acts since their last inclusion on the list. Yet, continued on the list is Kahane Chai (now representing a merger of the Kahane Chai and Kach group). What, pray tell, have been the even alleged “terrorist” acts of Kahane Chai in the past two years?

About the Author:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “The Two Lists”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Presidents
A Tale of Two Societies: When a President’s Hero is a Terrorist
Latest Indepth Stories
Presidents

Palestinian society treats mass murderers as heroes & is led by a president who embraces terrorists

Lewis-050115-Police-Training-at-Aleh

Although it’s emotionally difficult to see the suffering, helping out makes me happy.

I decided to really understand what Jewish people go through by becoming a Jew.

March for Armenian Genocide

Why does Obama and other democratic world leaders resist branding the Armenian killings as genocide?

I stated with clarity in simple terms, “Jews don’t have gangs.”

FBI’s undercover agents contacted ORA (Org. for the Resolution of Agunot) pretending to be an agunah

Israel promotes coexistence and peace, providing freedom for all religions on the Temple Mount.

The Jewish vote won’t impact polls as much as it will the coffers of candidates and their Super PACs

Iran stands unopposed by the “international community” and is racing to assert regional dominance.

If some Israeli cops got a Jewish education & learned to love Jews, Israel would be a better place

No where in the world is there the level of intervention by foreign countries as exists in Israel.

The Ravens’ Ray Lewis screamed that violence is never the answer.” Unfortunately, he is wrong.

Obama is the latest incarnation of our ancient enemies who arise every generation with a new face

Why do Jews, then, sometimes feel more intensely about Polish anti-Semitism than they do about German anti-Semitism?

More Articles from Editorial Board

The president is unwilling to cede any of what he considers his exclusive powers in the area of foreign policy and has struggled mightily to keep the Senate away from any role in the kind of deal to be negotiated.

A committed Religious Zionist, he was a sought-after adviser on Zionist affairs around the world.

More important, Mr. Obama is simply acceding to Iran’s position on the timing of the lifting of sanctions.

For our community, Mrs. Clinton’s foreign policy record will doubtless attract the most attention. And it is a most interesting one.

He went on to say that the United States would defend Israel if it were “attacked by any state.”

In their zechus may we all come to appreciate that life is a fleeting gift and resolve to spend every precious moment of it as if it were the last.

A worthy idea any way you look at it.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/the-two-lists/2001/11/10/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: