Sun Bat Yam is a spectacular new seaside real estate project combining tourism with real estate investment.
Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas’s statement last Saturday that “Israeli intransigence” was behind the collapse of the recently convened Israel-Palestinian talks in Jordan may provide a moment of truth for President Obama.
According to The New York Times’s Ethan Bronner, citing senior officials from both sides, Israeli negotiators told their Palestinian counterparts that their guiding principle for future borders in a two state solution would include existing settlement blocs as part of Israel. The Palestinians summarily rejected this. Significantly, a Palestinian spokesman said that “Our starting point is the 1967 borders with minor swaps and theirs is the wall and settlements.” (The wall refers to the separation barrier Israel has been building for a number of years.)
President Obama famously said last spring that he favored final borders based on the 1967 lines with mutual swaps – by which he said he meant to include the major Jewish population centers in the West Bank. Mr. Obama’s formulation, which he claims to have been initially misunderstood, caused a very public confrontation with Prime Minister Netanyahu.
The Palestinian position now pushes things beyond the debate over what President Obama really meant. In the here and now, the Palestinian focus on the 1967 lines with “minor changes” is plainly inconsistent with the notion that “swaps” would include tradeoffs for large population centers.
The question is thus whether President Obama is prepared to take the next step and tell the Palestinians that America stands for Israel’s retaining the major settlement blocs. At the very least, he should declare who he thinks is at fault for the breakdown in the talks.Editorial Board
About the Author:
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Comments are closed.
According to ADL Director Greenblatt’s logic, Jews who defame Israel and canvas foreign governments to intensify pressure on Israel are welcome because disagreement and dissent are “Jewish ideals”
Kissinger’s almost anti-Semitic claim that US support for Israel is bought with Jewish money was probably untrue in 1975 and is even less so today,
Instead of gratitude to Israel for their generosity, Arabs use the Temple Mount as a club to beat Israel which allows this despite not having to. Israel’s stupidity is breathtaking.
For the NY Times, Gazan and Palestinian fears are real while Israeli fears are overblown, delusional scenarios, which the army then uses as a propaganda to conceal their over-reactions
If no act of God intervenes, this November’s presidential election offers 2 bad choices: Hillary OR Bernie on the Dem. side vs. Donald Trump, the loudest, crudest mouth in the race
UN resolutions and EU statements condemn Israel for the audacity of not committing suicide while no resolutions are brought against Palestinian leaders for inciting hate and encouraging murder
The message of E Pluribus Unum has long resonated in American hearts and minds. But the Left doesn’t like it. According to them, it’s racist.
Millions of dollars are stolen in the ongoing scandal of Palestinian corruption via willfully-gullible European governments, and a co-operative United States in a Rewards for Terror scheme.
Hamas are not burrowing tunnels because Gaza has no port. They are burrowing them despite the fact it does not have one.
What books would you recommend to someone seeking intellectual ammunition for his belief in 1) the existence of G-d? and 2) the divinity of the Bible?
Bogy Ya’alon, trumpeted as the new savior by the Right and settlers, turned out to be (surprise, surprise) a strategic disaster for Israel’s security
Numbers resonate in our consciousness and our world but no number has the power and significance of the number seven. It is the perfect number and Judaism’s most sacred number.
Once upon a time Venezuela was a true friend and supporter of Israel, today it attacks Israel with anti-Semitic rhetoric at UN Security Council meetings.
As for the legislation passed by the Senate, if it becomes law it would carve out an exception to a 1976 law that largely immunizes foreign nations from being sued in U.S. courts.
Significantly, though, there is precious little leverage the president has with Russia, North Korea, and China.
Actually, the public doesn’t appear to share the media’s obsession with the minutiae of a candidate’s tax returns…
We had hoped that Mr. Silver’s prodigious accomplishments on behalf of all New Yorkers would play a greater role in his sentencing than they apparently did.
The article was built around an interview Mr. Samuels conducted with Mr. Rhodes and clearly shows how the public and Congress were purposefully misled.
“Almost any deal is better than no deal,” seemed to be the operating principle.
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/time-for-a-presidential-clarification/2012/02/01/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: