web analytics
June 19, 2013 / 11 Tammuz, 5773
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Bicycle in South Pioneers of the Periphery: Olim of the South

Got that pioneering spirit? You’re invited to help build Israel’s periphery by planting roots in southern soil with Nefesh B’Nefesh.



Letters To The Editor

tell a friend
Letters-logo

What Were They Thinking? Re “Jewish Leaders: Arabs Counting on Israel to Eliminate Iran Threat” (front page news story, Feb. 24):

I was troubled by some comments attributed to officials of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations. While I recognize the value of having capable organizational leaders with access to heads of state around the world, I wonder whether revealing what the discussions were all about is helpful.

It would seem to me that if this kind of “back channel” is to be useful, those interested in sending a message must have absolute confidence in the discretion of their messengers. I wonder whether the Arab leaders who were met with were all that happy with the disclosure that they are on board with Israel on significant issues. They, as well as Israel, live in a very dangerous neighborhood.

Also, I hope the positive spin on the intentions of Arab leaders with respect to Iran and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will not serve to feed the pressure on Israel to make further concessions. Andrew Schiller (Via E-Mail)

 

Israel Must Decide The news that American intelligence agencies are advising the president that they have discovered no evidence Iran is moving toward a nuclear military capacity confirms my feeling that Israel is to be isolated regarding Iran in the coming weeks and months (“Division Over Iran?” editorial, Feb. 24).

Of course, the news came just days after the UN’s nuclear monitoring agency came to precisely the opposite conclusion. While Israel is not alone in having reasonable fears of a nuclear Iran, it is in most immediate and direct danger. In the final analysis, it has to be Israel that finally decides on a matter so critical to its survival. Yehudit Franco Jerusalem

 

Rebbetzin Weinberg I thoroughly enjoyed the article in last week’s Magazine section on Rebbetzin Chana Weinberg, a”h, by her grandson Yehuda Weisbord (“Comforting the Afflicted: The Life of Rebbetzin Chana Weinberg”).

Her life of courage and dedication, as lovingly portrayed by her grandson, is a true inspiration. She was the daughter of a Talmudic genius and was also married to one, but she seemed to have a lifelong mission of her own, putting her superior intelligence and creative talents at the service of Jews in need.

One has but to look at her face to just know she was especially compassionate, introspective, utterly unflappable and completely comfortable with her role in life – a mix that is of inestimable value to those in desperate need of guidance and comfort. Menachem Abromovitch (Via E-Mail)

 

Article Inspires Fond Memories Dr. Rivkah Blau’s “A Landscape Transformed: Orthodoxy and America’s Elite Universities” (front-page essay, Feb. 24) was of particular interest to me, since I lived in Elizabeth from 1968 to 1974 and had the privilege of knowing Rav Mordechai Pinchas Teitz, zt”l. I also know Dr. Blau, her husband Rabbi Yosef Blau, and her brother Rabbi Elazar Mayer Teitz.

In her article Dr. Blau writes, “Mr. Levy also underwrote the kosher facility at Stevens Institute of Technology.”

I came to Stevens in 1968 and, after seeing the virtual non-existence of any formal Jewish life on campus, decided a kosher dining club was needed. I was able to convince a group of boys to join a kosher dining club if I could get one started. I went to Rav Teitz and told him what I wanted to do. I will never forget his reply: “We started Princeton and now we must help Stevens.” This was Rav Teitz’s way. He was a doer.

Shortly thereafter he gave me a check for $1,000 to start the dining club in the basement of a nearby synagogue. Truth be told, until I read in Dr. Blau’s article that Mr. Levy supplied the funds, I never knew where they came from.

The dining club lasted only one year, unfortunately. Some of the boys lived on the third floor of the shul, and the rabbi expected them to help make the daily minyan. Given that only one of the boys had a yeshiva education, it is not surprising that they resisted this. At the end of a year the congregation decided it did not want the dining club in its synagogue, and that was the end of it.

Reading Dr. Blau’s article brought back many memories, even though I had nothing to do with Princeton and its Jewish activities. The mention of my friend Rabbi Dr. Leon (Eliezer) Ehrenpreis, z”l, is just one of them. Professor Yitzchok Levine Brooklyn, NY

Editor’s Note: Dr. Levine writes the popular monthly Glimpses Into American Jewish History column for The Jewish Press. This month’s installment can be found on page 68.

 

Demonizing Obama Recently I posted comments on several Orthodox websites defending President Obama from the absurd charges that he’s an anti-Semite and that he wishes to harm Israel. I wish to share some of my feelings with your readers.

I too have issues with Obama, but I also had issues with Bill Clinton and George W. Bush and I never thought to harbor the kind of hateful thoughts about them that so many of us seem to harbor toward Obama.

I’ve never seen a president – liberal or conservative, Democrat or Republican – demonized on such a level by so many in the frum community. I’m sorry, but this has to go beyond mere disagreement over policy. What is it about the man that makes so many of us so crazy? I have my suspicions, but I won’t spell them out here. What I will say is that I appreciate the editorials in The Jewish Press that take Obama to task in no uncertain terms but that do it respectfully. You never resort to name-calling and you have not hesitated to say positive things about Obama if you feel he’s earned that praise.

To those who say Obama hates Israel, I say prove it. Even in his much-maligned Cairo speech in 2009, Obama told the Arab world that the bonds between the U.S. and Israel were unbreakable. Since then he’s increased the level of defense and intelligence aid and cooperation between the U.S. and Israel to unprecedented levels; stood with Israel during the Goldstone Report controversy; backed Israel over the Gaza flotilla incident; urged Congress to fund Israel’s Iron Dome project; stood against the whole world in preventing the formation of a Palestinian state last fall and then went into the lion’s den – the United Nations – and gave a speech that was more pro-Israel than anything any previous American president ever said at the UN.

And as much as I disagree with Obama’s positions on settlements and the ’67 lines, they have been U.S. policy for more than 40 years; every previous president has pressured Israel on settlements and has envisioned a peace agreement based on the ’67 lines with adjustments. Some referred to those adjustments as accommodating reality on the ground while others called them land swaps, but basically the idea was that the negotiations would involve to one extent or another the territories in Judea and Samaria that Israel won in the Six-Day War.

I happen to be a conservative Republican who voted against Obama in 2008 and will do so again later this year, but I can’t stand the ignorance and hate that too may frum Jews exhibit when it comes to the man.
Howard Feinberg
(Via E-Mail)

Pages: 1 2 All Pages
tell a friend

About the Author:


You might also be interested in:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

no comments

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Latest Indepth Stories
Louis Rene Beres

Starting next week, Professor Beres’s column will be on summer hiatus until September. * * * * * In June 1998, Prof. Beres, following publication of an op-ed article in The New York Times, was invited by then-Swiss Ambassador Thomas Borer to present personal testimony before the specially-constituted Swiss Commission on World War II in [...]

Gilor-Dov

Israel is a country that understands security concerns. Many civil rights have been sacrificed in the name of security and Israelis are used to being checked every time they enter a shopping center, a large store or any public building. Americans recently learned that they, too, are subject to many checks on their most private activities.

Moshe-Feiglin-022213

Without a clear worldview, it is impossible to coherently deal with the challenge of the strategic changes taking place throughout the world – and particularly in the Middle East. Before our very eyes, a worldwide and local revolution is unfolding; their significance is greater than both World Wars combined.

No one can envy President Obama’s current dilemma over Syria.

His decision to begin arming the Syrian rebels challenging Bashar Assad’s regime drew charges that the rebel forces are driven by jihad movements, particularly al Qaeda. Further, many rebel spokesmen have regularly denounced Israel and suggested that once in power they will end Mr. Assad’s policy of not rocking the boat with Israel. How, then, critics ask, could the president align the U.S. with the rebels?

In a gushing report on the election of Hassan Rohani as Iran’s new president, The New York Times began with this: “In a striking repudiation of the ultraconservatives who wield power in Iran, voters…overwhelmingly elected a mild-mannered cleric who advocates greater personal freedoms and a more conciliatory approach to the world.”

Last month in this space we noted that the New York State Assembly was considering legislation that would prohibit domestic insurers from including on their financial statements investments in companies that engage in investment activities in Iran. These financial statements are relied upon by the state to determine whether the company is solvent and able to pay claims. That bill has since passed the Assembly, but the New York State Senate is balking at passing it as well.

There is no other candidate running for mayor who supports our community’s values as Salgado does.

If the eyes are the window to the soul, then children’s eyes are the window to the Almighty Himself.

Adding Turkey to the list of volatile states would mean even more uncertainty for Israel.

Making Rouhani the president was a brilliant strategic move for Khamene’i.

Noone, least of all me, wants to see any Arab child suffer, God forbid.

The Sanctuary was built with an ezrat nashim, a separate area for women.

The 686 men who expressed their desire to run in Iran’s presidential election were whittled down to 8.

    Latest Poll

    Female, Orthodox, Halachic Deciders and Spiritual Leaders (Maharat)









    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/letters-to-the-editor/letters-to-the-editor-204/2012/02/29/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online:

Close