web analytics
July 29, 2015 / 13 Av, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Letters To The Editor

Letters-logo

Painful Loss (I)

I want to thank The Jewish Press for the beautiful and extensive coverage of the life and untimely petirah of Shlomo Zakheim, zt”l.

Unlike the countless beneficiaries of his kindness and warmth, I was never privileged to meet Mr. Zakheim. But I sincerely felt I came to know him through the tributes you featured and I mourned the painful loss to Klal Yisrael. It was fitting that I read these articles on September 11 and just before Yom Kippur; I was sobbing audibly from the very moving and inspiring memories and anecdotes you shared.

May his bereaved family have a nechamah, and may his pleas on our behalf help hasten the geulah sheleimah.

Yehi zichro baruch.

Naomi Gross
Ramat Beit Shemesh, Israel

Painful Loss (II)

I never met Shlomo Zakheim but from what I’ve read he was like a storybook character who dreams of accumulating wealth and spreading it around in order to make a difference in the lives of the unfortunate.

In many of those stories the dream doesn’t quite pan out. Mr. Zakheim, however, was able to use the fruits of his success to help so many others. The Jewish community is fortunate to have had a man of his generosity.

Chaim Halpern
(Via E-Mail)

AIPAC’s Push On Syria

Re: “AIPAC Makes Belated but Big Push on U.S. Response to Syria Chemical Attack” (front page news story, Sept. 13):

I can understand why Jewish organizations would be pushing for Congressional support should President Obama make good on his promise to punish Syria if it used chemical weapons. Israel’s security depends in large measure on how seriously Israel’s enemies take U.S. guarantees.

However, I also believe it is very dangerous for American Jews to get too far out in front of most other Americans on this issue. It is one thing to advocate U.S. intervention when and if Israel is under attack or seriously threatened. It is quite another to promote an American war to protect Israel’s long term security interests. Such a thing would not play well with our fellow Americans.

Bruce Atterman
(Via E-Mail)

Putin’s Price

“Does Putin’s Help Come With a Price?” asks the title of one of your editorials last week. Of course it does. Who can seriously contest the fact that Obama’s incoherent policies on Syria have immensely elevated Russia’s influence and effective power in the region, thereby filling the vacuum left by a diminished U.S.?

The chickens have indeed come home to roost in the perverse scenario of Putin presenting a lifeline to an American president faced with the very real probability that a wary Congress would deal a fatal body blow to his request for authorization of a military strike on Syria.

The ultimate price for Putin’s help is yet to be calculated.

Fay Dicker
Lakewood, NJ

Long National Nightmare

If the Obama administration’s incredible mishandling of the Syria situation wasn’t embarrassing enough, Vladimir Putin’s nauseatingly hypocritical Sept. 12 New York Times op-ed article surely supplied several more exclamation points.

Putin’s piece invoked a panoply of Western political pieties, such as “international law and order,” and stoked war fears. He scolded claims of American exceptionalism. The former KGB operative also advanced the pope’s pleas for peace and called down God’s blessings. Israel’s fate came in for his deep concern.

The only genuine sentiment evident throughout the article was an utter contempt for the political intelligence of Americans and, by extension, the administration.

This from a man who routinely jails journalists and political opponents, slowly suffocates Russian democracy, violently suppresses Caucasus rebellions despite its “language of force” and the civilian casualties he otherwise decries, supplies arms and UN Security Council vetoes to a Syrian regime massacring its own people, steals state assets for his cronies, and thwarts the U.S. at every opportunity.

For its part, the Times should be deeply ashamed at having printed such self-serving claptrap. It is of a piece with Charlie Rose’s lamentable recent PBS interview with Bashar al Assad. Taken together, they are damning evidence of the precipitous decline of American journalism. Sadly, providing such propaganda platforms for America’s enemies has now become commonplace.

The willful weakness this administration projects can only embolden America’s enemies and demoralize its friends. Unfortunately, its tenure extends for another forty months. Our long national nightmare is far from over.

About the Author:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Letters To The Editor”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Obama on Iran Deal
Is Obama a State Sponsor of Terrorism?
Latest Indepth Stories
Obama on Iran Deal

If the Iran deal passes, Obama’s WH becomes world’s leading financier of terrorism against Americans

Open Tent

{Originally posted to the author’s website, FirstOne Through} Some passionate and eloquent liberals have bemoaned the state of inclusiveness among Jews today. Leon Wieseltier, editor of the New Republic penned an angry piece “J Street’s Rejection Is a Scandal” about the exclusion in 2014 of J Street from the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations. […]

Hamas on the Temple Mount - Jul 3, 2015

Magnanimity by Moshe Dayan, allowing Muslim control of the Temple Mount, led to today’s situation.

Community-Jewels-logo

It was modeled upon a similar fund that had been set up by Sephardic Jews in Venice. But Amsterdam’s Dotar was initially more ambitious in scope.

Rav Aharon Margalit is a bestselling author – his book, As Long As I Live, has been translated into four languages – and a standing-room only lecturer. Both religious and non-religious audiences flock to hear him. What makes him so extraordinary? Rav Margalit is a Chasidic Jew who experienced incredible challenges from a very young […]

J Street is the vanguard (Jewish face)in support of Obama’s Vienna Accords Nuclear Deal with Iran

“I hold the woman’s place over that of men in every fundamental aspect of public and private life.”

The US-UNRWA accord is another example of this White House, hostile to Israel, disregarding truth.

On the saddest day on the Jewish calendar, Tisha B’av, a reflection on the dangerous deal with Iran

The Kotel gained significance around 1550. Previously, many Jews prayed on the Temple Mount itself.

All Jews MUST stand together to oppose boycotts against Israel. So why does NIF & JCF support BDS?

This year it is hard to concentrate on anything but Iran building nuclear weapons to destroy Israel

Bibi failed the moment he transferred Israel’s Iran problem to the international arena.

I was entranced by Kaddish, a song of sorrow of the whole of Israel for the 1000s of years of exile

Like the Avos, we are invested with the mission to inspire humanity to become nobler and greater

Iran accords are worse than Munich; even Chamberlain would be shocked at what is transpiring again.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/letters-to-the-editor/letters-to-the-editor-269/2013/09/17/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: