web analytics
February 1, 2015 / 12 Shevat, 5775
 
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Letters To The Editor


Letters-logo

Not So Operatic

Harvey Rachlin’s article comparing the Shabbat morning service to a great grand opera was nothing less than awe-inspiring (“The Shabbat Morning Service: Like an Opera – Only More,” op-ed, Feb. 14).

Unfortunately, his experience in shul is not one that is shared by the majority of worshipers in Orthodox congregations. Instead of a sonorous voice and soaring melodies flowing through the room, we are more likely to be treated to a whiney, nasal and/or off-key belching of what purports to be our service to HaKadosh Baruch Hu.

If davening is supposed to be in lieu of korbanot, what is being offered would not have been deemed an acceptable sacrifice under any shitah. Perhaps if our congregants were instructed in the halacha regarding who is permitted to lead the service (having yahrzeit is not a qualification) and how the service is to be performed (some of the required melodies are called miSinai for a reason) our Shabbat davening might indeed become the fascinating, memorable, religious, and spiritual experience it should be.

Mark Stone
(Via E-Mail)

Modern Orthodox Schism (I)

Re the recent articles, editorials and letters to the editor concerning the growing schism in Modern Orthodoxy:

The controversy over who makes authoritative decisions in Orthodoxy sparked by troublesome developments in the “Open Orthodoxy” movement (including the designation by Rabbi Avi Weiss of so-called rabbahs and the more recent announcements by the heads of SAR Academy and the Ramaz School that female students may put on tefillin if they wish to do so ) is not without precedent.

Some 25 years ago, several Orthodox Rabbis, most of them graduates of RIETS, formed the Orthodox Roundtable, sometimes referred to as the RCA Roundtable. Their plan was to tackle, within halachic parameters, key problems facing the Orthodox community.

These were mostly individuals who knew their way around the halachic literature and were certainly people of serious accomplishment. Yet even they would admit they were not on the level of the Talmudic giants whom Jews have relied on for centuries for definitive halachic decisions. Ultimately, the group disbanded in the face of criticism from elements within the RCA as well as from some of the roshei yeshiva at RIETS.

If the Orthodox Roundtable met with such resistance, we should expect even more of a backlash to the ideas being spouted by the champions of Open Orthodoxy. That is why I can only hope that Rabbi Hershel Schachter’s eloquent challenge to the SAR and Ramaz initiatives (“More on the Tefillin Controversy,” editorial, Feb. 14) will be followed by similar reactions from the RCA and RIETS ranks.

Modern Orthodoxy is facing an epic identity crisis and the time to address it is now.

Marc Levinson
(Via E-Mail)

Modern Orthodox Schism (II)

I was very impressed with Rabbi Hershel Schachter’s erudite responsum concerning women wearing tefillin. He is certainly someone to admire. Yet even he seems not to grasp the nature of the problems facing Orthodoxy.

Today women are out in the world as never before. They are proving themselves every bit as creative and capable as men, and even more devout. To keep them restrained by narrow interpretations of halacha when there are valid interpretations supporting a more progressive approach is simply wrong. It is not natural and cannot lead to anything good in the long run.

Reuven Rothman
Jerusalem

Netanyahu’s Modest Proposal (I)

Re Shlomo Greenwald’s Feb. 7 op-ed “Netanyahu’s Modest Proposal”:

Benjamin Netanyahu has to be my favorite Israeli politician, with Dore Gold a close second. Ideas such as Netanyahu’s change perceptions and when perceptions change it opens up whole new opportunities.

Steve Moyer

About the Author:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

One Response to “Letters To The Editor”

  1. Roy Neal Grissom says:

    Does Mr. Hershkowitz feel that the police and military in Nazi Germany did not enjoy a sufficient-enough monopoly on legal firearms ownership?

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Islamic State flag displayed from Arab residence in Israel.
Cleared for Publication: Another Israeli-Arab ISIS Recruit from Nazareth
Latest Indepth Stories
Eli Weiss

Shepherding in the Shomron isn’t your usual kind of shepherding – despite his business-minded beginnings, Eli has discovered that a strong ideological impetus powers the job.

Resnick-013015-Pilot

I said to myself, “This story has got to be told. We’re losing this generation of World War II and if we don’t listen to them now, we’ve lost it.”

Eller-013015

His entire existence was about spreading simcha and glorifying G-d’s name on a daily basis.

IRAN-US-POLITICS-MILITARY

An Israeli strike could theoretically damage Iran’s nuclear program; only US can terminate program

At some point we need to stop simply defending and promoting Israel and start living in Israel

“We Jews are the only people who when we drop a book on the floor pick it up and kiss it.”

Though Zaide was the publisher of The Jewish Press, a big newspaper,I always remember him learning

Speaker Silver has been an extraordinary public servant since his election to the Assembly in 1975 and has been an exemplary leader of that body since 1994.

He spent the first leg of his daylong visit to the French capital at Hyper Cacher.

Drawing Congress into the Iran nuclear debate is the last thing the White House wants.

Great leaders like Miriam and like Sarah Schenirer possess the capacity to challenge the status quo that confronts them.

Obama’s foreign policy is viewed by both liberals and conservatives as deeply flawed

Many journalists are covertly blaming the Charlie Hebdo writers themselves through self-censorship.

Why does the Times relay different motivations and narratives for jihadists in Europe and Israel?

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/letters-to-the-editor/letters-to-the-editor-291/2014/02/19/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: