web analytics
June 20, 2013 / 12 Tammuz, 5773
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Bicycle in South Pioneers of the Periphery: Olim of the South

Got that pioneering spirit? You’re invited to help build Israel’s periphery by planting roots in southern soil with Nefesh B’Nefesh.



And Take Your Broomstick With You


tell a friend
Media-Monitor-logo

Helen Thomas’s boundless disdain for Israel, so apparent to anyone who heard or read her leading questions and hostile asides at countless presidential press conferences over the years, finally did her in this week.
Forced to call it a career after she was videotaped telling an interviewer that Jews should “get the hell out of Palestine” and “go home” to Germany and Poland, Thomas will now forever be remembered as much for the sheer ugliness of her attitude toward Israel as for her decades of news reporting and writing.
Thomas’s colleagues in the mainstream media did their best to ignore the story – the video clip of her remarks was circulating all over the Internet and headlined the Drudge Report over the weekend but if you relied solely on The New York Times or other conventional media outlets for your news, you likely knew nothing of the accelerating controversy until Thomas announced her resignation Monday.
The protectiveness of her fellow journalists was understandable: she was one of them through and through. She despised Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, liked Bill Clinton and positively adored Barack Obama.
“I’m a liberal,” she said in 2006. “I was born a liberal, and I will be a liberal [until] the day I die.”
Hence the reluctance on the part of her ideological soulmates in the Washington press corps to report the sort of story they would have jumped on if a conservative reporter or pundit had slurred blacks or Hispanics or gays or feminists or, yes, Jews. It wasn’t the target of Thomas’s remarks that gave the press pause, it was the fact that those remarks came from someone whose political outlook jibed so nicely with that of most other journalists.
As mentioned above, Thomas’s anti-Israel proclivities are an old story. Here are a couple of the Monitor’s favorite Thomas White House press conference performances; the first occurred in 2001, the second a year later.
2001: Unidentified reporter: President [Bush] to meet with [Yasir] Arafat?
    Press secretary Ari Fleischer: John, as soon as we have anything to announce, if we do, we will let you know.
Thomas: That’s not an answer. This has been a very one-sided dialogue, and not talking to – any president not talking to any Palestinian leader face to face, and we want to know why.
Fleischer: Helen, the president has met with many -
Thomas: There’s two sides to this conflict, you know.
Fleischer: The president has met with many Arab leaders who have come here and met with him in the Oval Office.
Thomas: They’re not Palestinians .
2002: Thomas: Ari, does the president think that the Palestinians have a right to resist 35 years of brutal military occupation and suppression?
Fleischer: Helen, the president . was the first to go to the United Nations and call for a Palestinian state. That remains the president’s hope. That remains the president’s vision. And, obviously, events in the Middle East have grown very violent. But that is the vision that the president continues to hold out for.
Thomas: But he does think they have a legitimate right to fight for their land?
Fleischer: Helen, I do not accept the description of the premise of your question, and the manner that you asked it.
Thomas (muttering): Occupation, 35 years.

And then there was the time Thomas upbraided the Iraqi foreign minister for what she felt was Iraq’s tepid response to the 1981 Israeli raid on that country’s nuclear reactor. The foreign affairs scholar Barry Rubin recalled the incident many years later in a Jerusalem Post article:

On a warm night in November 1984, I walked up the path of a luxurious house in northwest Washington that served as the Iraqi ambassador’s mansion. That very day, the two countries had announced the resumption of diplomatic relations and the Iraqi flag flew outside for the first time in many years. The charming, worldly ambassador, Nizar Hamdoun, had invited a small group to dinner to meet then-foreign minister [Tariq] Aziz .
Aziz was visiting Washington to secure more U.S. help in Iraq’s war with Iran . Aziz made a strong pitch for the United States to support Iraq in the Gulf.

    At that point, though, Helen Thomas of UPI interrupted him. “Why didn’t you retaliate” against Israel, she asked, “when [it] destroyed your nuclear reactor?” The foreign minister tried to brush away the question. Thomas did not find the response acceptable, “Just yellow, I guess,” she complained.

 

Jason Maoz can be reached at jmaoz@jewishpress.com

tell a friend

About the Author: Jason Maoz is the Senior Editor of The Jewish Press.


You might also be interested in:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

no comments

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Latest Indepth Stories
Louis Rene Beres

Starting next week, Professor Beres’s column will be on summer hiatus until September. * * * * * In June 1998, Prof. Beres, following publication of an op-ed article in The New York Times, was invited by then-Swiss Ambassador Thomas Borer to present personal testimony before the specially-constituted Swiss Commission on World War II in [...]

Gilor-Dov

Israel is a country that understands security concerns. Many civil rights have been sacrificed in the name of security and Israelis are used to being checked every time they enter a shopping center, a large store or any public building. Americans recently learned that they, too, are subject to many checks on their most private activities.

Netanyahu shaking Arafat's hand upon handing the Palestinians most of Hebron.

Without a vision, strategy is impossible. Tactics become farcical.

No one can envy President Obama’s current dilemma over Syria.

His decision to begin arming the Syrian rebels challenging Bashar Assad’s regime drew charges that the rebel forces are driven by jihad movements, particularly al Qaeda. Further, many rebel spokesmen have regularly denounced Israel and suggested that once in power they will end Mr. Assad’s policy of not rocking the boat with Israel. How, then, critics ask, could the president align the U.S. with the rebels?

In a gushing report on the election of Hassan Rohani as Iran’s new president, The New York Times began with this: “In a striking repudiation of the ultraconservatives who wield power in Iran, voters…overwhelmingly elected a mild-mannered cleric who advocates greater personal freedoms and a more conciliatory approach to the world.”

Last month in this space we noted that the New York State Assembly was considering legislation that would prohibit domestic insurers from including on their financial statements investments in companies that engage in investment activities in Iran. These financial statements are relied upon by the state to determine whether the company is solvent and able to pay claims. That bill has since passed the Assembly, but the New York State Senate is balking at passing it as well.

There is no other candidate running for mayor who supports our community’s values as Salgado does.

If the eyes are the window to the soul, then children’s eyes are the window to the Almighty Himself.

Adding Turkey to the list of volatile states would mean even more uncertainty for Israel.

Making Rouhani the president was a brilliant strategic move for Khamene’i.

Noone, least of all me, wants to see any Arab child suffer, God forbid.

The Sanctuary was built with an ezrat nashim, a separate area for women.

The 686 men who expressed their desire to run in Iran’s presidential election were whittled down to 8.

More Articles from Jason Maoz
Front-Page-040513

I was shamed into becoming a baseball fan by my mother, a Holocaust survivor who came to America in 1953 and who to this day doesn’t know the difference between a home run and a strikeout.

Michael Kelly

The late Michael Kelly was a brilliant writer and editor (The New York Times, Washington Post, The New Republic, The Atlantic) who coincidentally happened to be an American patriot and a strong supporter of Israel – a combination not commonly found in the circles in which he traveled.

Even as he left office in January 2002 on a note of unprecedented triumph and popularity, the tone of the New York Times’s editorials and most of its news coverage was startlingly jaundiced.

Koch became a chronic – some would say compulsive – critic of Giuliani.

Resnick has collected five dozen of his best interviews in book format. Called “Movers and Shakers: Sixty Prominent Personalities Speak Their Mind on Tape” (Brenn Books), the collection includes updates on nearly every interviewee plus several questions that never appeared in The Jewish Press.

Al Gore has been in the news again, and even some of his biggest admirers are upset with Gore’s decision to sell his Current TV cable network to Al Jazeera, which is owned by the oil-rich Islamic monarchy of Qatar, for $500 million.

Ehud Barak may or may not be out of Israeli politics for good, but his recent resignation announcement reminded the Monitor of just how much the man had been willing to give up to Yasir Arafat at the tail end of Bill Clinton’s presidency.

Roughly 30 percent of those Jews who had voted for Reagan in 1980 went for Mondale in 1984.

    Latest Poll

    Female, Orthodox, Halachic Deciders and Spiritual Leaders (Maharat)









    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/media-monitor/and-take-your-broomstick-with-you/2010/06/09/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online:

Close