web analytics
August 22, 2014 / 26 Av, 5774
Israel at War: Operation Protective Edge
 
 
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat (L) visits the JewishPress.com booth at The Event. And the Winners of the JewishPress.com Raffle Are…

Congratulations to all the winners of the JewishPress.com raffle at The Event



Home » InDepth » Monitor »

Bernie, You Could Have Done Better


Media-Monitor-logo

The Monitor likes Bernard Goldberg, it really does. And the Monitor despises the smugly insular media types who’ve been lambasting the former CBS News correspondent for his bestselling (#1 on this week’s New York Times list) expose of the liberal bias that pervades the nation’s news media.

But for honesty’s sake, the Monitor has no choice but to say that Goldberg’s book, Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News (Regnery Publishers) is more than a little disappointing.

Don’t get the Monitor wrong: Bias is certainly a worthwhile read, and the stories Goldberg recounts are entertaining and even instructive. It’s just that the book has about it the feel of one of those ubiquitous, self-congratulatory “as told to” celebrity biographies, heavy on personal anecdotes and light when it comes to any serious analysis.

And, as if that weren’t bad enough, the book has no index – the absolute gravest sin for an author hoping to be taken seriously.

It’s a pity, because Goldberg – a self-described liberal who never voted for a Republican presidential candidate in his life – had the opportunity to offer readers a textured history of liberal bias in the media, how that bias developed and why it’s proven so difficult to dislodge.

Instead, far too much of the book is devoted to settling scores with his former colleagues and bosses at CBS, and in ridiculing the all-too-ridiculous Dan Rather, who, after Goldberg is through with him, comes off looking as arrogant and as asinine as his most strident critics have always insisted he is. (For an equally deflating but better-written portrait of Rather, interested readers should get their hands on a copy of Peter J. Boyer’s classic 1988 book Who Killed CBS?)

Disappointing though it is, Bias has been lionized by conservative reviewers (even by those who, the Monitor suspects, harbor reservations similar to the ones mentioned above), and understandably so: It’s not every day that a veteran journalist – one with impeccable liberal credentials, yet – steps forward and confirms what conservatives have long claimed, usually to the hoots and jeers of editors, reporters and anchors.

As Goldberg amply documents, liberals and liberalism rule the roost in the country’s elite newspapers and TV newsrooms, while conservatives and conservatism are given short shrift at best or treated with outright ridicule at worst.

It should be noted that Goldberg includes a chapter in his book on the media’s politically correct treatment of Arab terrorism and the debilitating double standard to which Israel is constantly subjected. But here, too, the subject is covered in a rushed and far from comprehensive manner. What’s lacking is an incisive examination of what it is in the liberal mindset that finds the Palestinian side of the story so compelling, and why it is that liberals are, by and large, far less supportive of Israel than conservatives.

Notwithstanding the less than enthusiastic review you’ve just read, the Monitor recommends Bias to anyone seeking a glimpse into the inner ideological workings of the media. If you live in Brooklyn, though, and you assume the Brooklyn Public Library has even a single copy for borrowing, assume again. Shamefully, as of Feb. 4 the Brooklyn Public Library had no copies of Bias available anywhere in its system, despite the fact that the book was published months ago and has been at or near the top of the best-seller lists almost from the outset

(As a longtime user of the Brooklyn Public Library system, the Monitor is all too familiar with the phenomenon of books by conservative authors or sympathetic to conservatism appearing on the shelves months after publication, while titles by the most marginal of left-wing authors show up immediately upon release, and often in great abundance.)

There is, by the way, a critique of the liberal media that was published last fall and is superior in nearly every way to Bias. It’s by William McGowan and it’s called Coloring the News: How Crusading for Diversity Has Corrupted American Journalism (Encounter Books). But don’t bother trying to find it at any of the 60 branches of the Brooklyn Public Library.

Jason Maoz can be reached at jmaoz@jewishpress.com

About the Author: Jason Maoz is the Senior Editor of The Jewish Press.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Bernie, You Could Have Done Better”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Photo: Rotter.net / Tikonist
Live Updates: Ashdod Shul Hit by Rocket (Latest Update: 5:28 pm)
Latest Indepth Stories
Charles Krauthammer

Wye would be seen to have set the groundwork for the creation of a Palestinian state

David_Grossman

Blaming Israel for the violence in Gaza, he ends up justifying Hamas’s terrorism.

488px-WielkaSynagoga3_Lodz

In the Thirties it was common for anti-Semites to call on Jews to “go to Palestine!”

Netanyahu-Obama-030212

Obama never hid his contempt for the Israeli government or the majority of Israel’s voters.

“This arbitrary ban is an ugly stain on our democracy, and it also undermines the rule of law.”

We take US “aid” for psychological reasons-if we have an allowance, that means we have a father.

ZIM Piraeus isn’t Israeli-owned or flagged, incidentally, it is Greek operated.

Foolish me, thinking the goals were the destruction of Hamas thereby giving peace a real chance.

The free-spirted lifestyle didn’t hold your interest; the needs of your people did.

And why would the U.S. align itself on these issues with Turkey and Qatar, longtime advocates of Hamas’s interests?

Several years ago the city concluded that the metzitzah b’peh procedure created unacceptable risks for newborns in terms of the transmission of neo-natal herpes through contact with a mohel carrying the herpes virus.

The world wars caused unimaginable anguish for the Jews but God also scripted a great glory for our people.

We were quite disappointed with many of the points the secretary-general offered in response.

Judging by history, every time Hamas rebuilds their infrastructure, they are stronger than before.

His father asked him to read Psalms from the Book of Tehilim every day.

More Articles from Jason Maoz
Charles Krauthammer

Wye would be seen to have set the groundwork for the creation of a Palestinian state

Presidential-Seal-062014

These are not necessarily the best all-around biographies or studies of the individual presidents listed (though some rank right up there), but the strongest in terms of exploring presidential attitudes and policies toward Israel.

The Clintonan “engagement” liberals remember with such fondness did nothing but embolden Arafat and Hamas and Hizbullah as they witnessed Israel’s only real ally elevate process ahead of policy.

What really makes one wonder about the affinity felt by certain Jews for Grant was the welcome mat he put out for some of the country’s most pernicious anti-Semites.

With 2013 marking half a century since Kennedy’s fateful limousine ride in Dallas, the current revels are exceeding the revisionist frenzies of years past, with a seemingly endless parade of books, articles and television specials designed to assure us that, despite everything that has come to light about him since his death, JFK was a great president, or at least a very good president who would have been great had his life not been so cruelly cut short.

As someone who for the past fifteen years has been writing a column that largely focuses on the news media, I’ve read what is no doubt an altogether unhealthy number of books on the subject. Most of them were instantly forgettable while some created a brief buzz but failed to pass the test of time. And then there were those select few that merited a permanent spot on the bookshelf.

George W. Bush has been getting some positive media coverage lately, with recent polls showing him at least as popular as his successor, Barack Obama, and a big new book about the Bush presidency by New York Times chief White House correspondent Peter Baker (Days of Fire, Doubleday) portraying Bush as a much more hands-on chief executive than his detractors ever imagined.

Readers who’ve stuck with the Monitor over the years will forgive this rerun of sorts, but as we approach the fortieth anniversary of the Yom Kippur War – and with the stench of presidential indecisiveness hanging so heavily over Washington these days – it seemed only appropriate to revisit Richard Nixon’s role in enabling Israel to recover from the staggering setbacks it suffered in the first week of fighting.

    Latest Poll

    Do you think the FAA ban on US flights to Israel is political?






    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/media-monitor/media-monitor-33/2002/03/06/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: