web analytics
October 2, 2014 / 8 Tishri, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Meir Panim with Soldiers 5774 Roundup: Year of Relief and Service for Israel’s Needy

Meir Panim implements programs that serve Israel’s neediest populations with respect and dignity. Meir Panim also coordinated care packages for families in the South during the Gaza War.



Home » InDepth » Monitor »

Bernie, You Could Have Done Better


Media-Monitor-logo

The Monitor likes Bernard Goldberg, it really does. And the Monitor despises the smugly insular media types who’ve been lambasting the former CBS News correspondent for his bestselling (#1 on this week’s New York Times list) expose of the liberal bias that pervades the nation’s news media.

But for honesty’s sake, the Monitor has no choice but to say that Goldberg’s book, Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News (Regnery Publishers) is more than a little disappointing.

Don’t get the Monitor wrong: Bias is certainly a worthwhile read, and the stories Goldberg recounts are entertaining and even instructive. It’s just that the book has about it the feel of one of those ubiquitous, self-congratulatory “as told to” celebrity biographies, heavy on personal anecdotes and light when it comes to any serious analysis.

And, as if that weren’t bad enough, the book has no index – the absolute gravest sin for an author hoping to be taken seriously.

It’s a pity, because Goldberg – a self-described liberal who never voted for a Republican presidential candidate in his life – had the opportunity to offer readers a textured history of liberal bias in the media, how that bias developed and why it’s proven so difficult to dislodge.

Instead, far too much of the book is devoted to settling scores with his former colleagues and bosses at CBS, and in ridiculing the all-too-ridiculous Dan Rather, who, after Goldberg is through with him, comes off looking as arrogant and as asinine as his most strident critics have always insisted he is. (For an equally deflating but better-written portrait of Rather, interested readers should get their hands on a copy of Peter J. Boyer’s classic 1988 book Who Killed CBS?)

Disappointing though it is, Bias has been lionized by conservative reviewers (even by those who, the Monitor suspects, harbor reservations similar to the ones mentioned above), and understandably so: It’s not every day that a veteran journalist – one with impeccable liberal credentials, yet – steps forward and confirms what conservatives have long claimed, usually to the hoots and jeers of editors, reporters and anchors.

As Goldberg amply documents, liberals and liberalism rule the roost in the country’s elite newspapers and TV newsrooms, while conservatives and conservatism are given short shrift at best or treated with outright ridicule at worst.

It should be noted that Goldberg includes a chapter in his book on the media’s politically correct treatment of Arab terrorism and the debilitating double standard to which Israel is constantly subjected. But here, too, the subject is covered in a rushed and far from comprehensive manner. What’s lacking is an incisive examination of what it is in the liberal mindset that finds the Palestinian side of the story so compelling, and why it is that liberals are, by and large, far less supportive of Israel than conservatives.

Notwithstanding the less than enthusiastic review you’ve just read, the Monitor recommends Bias to anyone seeking a glimpse into the inner ideological workings of the media. If you live in Brooklyn, though, and you assume the Brooklyn Public Library has even a single copy for borrowing, assume again. Shamefully, as of Feb. 4 the Brooklyn Public Library had no copies of Bias available anywhere in its system, despite the fact that the book was published months ago and has been at or near the top of the best-seller lists almost from the outset

(As a longtime user of the Brooklyn Public Library system, the Monitor is all too familiar with the phenomenon of books by conservative authors or sympathetic to conservatism appearing on the shelves months after publication, while titles by the most marginal of left-wing authors show up immediately upon release, and often in great abundance.)

There is, by the way, a critique of the liberal media that was published last fall and is superior in nearly every way to Bias. It’s by William McGowan and it’s called Coloring the News: How Crusading for Diversity Has Corrupted American Journalism (Encounter Books). But don’t bother trying to find it at any of the 60 branches of the Brooklyn Public Library.

Jason Maoz can be reached at jmaoz@jewishpress.com

About the Author: Jason Maoz is the Senior Editor of The Jewish Press.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Bernie, You Could Have Done Better”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Car Smashed in A-Tur 2
4 Women Survive Near Lynch on Mount of Olives
Latest Indepth Stories
Ben Cohen

The coalition the US has assembled to fight ISIS is based on an immediate coincidence of interest.

Jews out of Silwan!

Would Obama stand for a housing policy that barred blacks from living in Washington, DC?

Jonah and the Whale (2012) 23 x 23, bronze relief by Lynda Caspe.

God will accept repentance, even if it is mostly for ulterior motives and likely not to last.

Mostofsky-100314

if her son remained non-responsive she would place honey on his lips on Rosh Hashanah so that he might realize it was the chag.

Soldiers at various hospitals complained that they experienced hostility from Arab hospital staff.

“We have succeeded in raising an ideological generation that loves death like our enemies love life”

There is not even a hint of recognition that Hamas deliberately fires rockets at civilian targets in Israel while storing arms and rocket launchers among its own civilians in Gaza.

No one with any sanity would dream of rationalizing or justifying the depredations perpetrated on the Arab world by ISIS.

With $2 billion on hand the Islamic State is an extremely well-funded terrorist group that may pose a major international crisis for the U.S. and the world. Learn about their rise to power and the toll they’ve taken thus far.

In the recent Gaza war and its aftermath, we saw a totally illogical reaction from the world.

A., a teacher: “I do not know a single Gazan who is pro-Hamas at the moment, except for those on its payroll.”

Is the global community clear in its response to these extremist groups?

Like our fabled character, Don Quixote, President Obama has constantly spawned his own reality.

Boroujerdi was informed that “the pressures and tortures will increase until he has been destroyed.”

More Articles from Jason Maoz
William Safire

“It’s a lousy column and a dishonest one,” Halberstam wrote. “So close it. Or you will end up just as shabby as Safire.”

Charles Krauthammer

Wye would be seen to have set the groundwork for the creation of a Palestinian state

These are not necessarily the best all-around biographies or studies of the individual presidents listed (though some rank right up there), but the strongest in terms of exploring presidential attitudes and policies toward Israel.

The Clintonan “engagement” liberals remember with such fondness did nothing but embolden Arafat and Hamas and Hizbullah as they witnessed Israel’s only real ally elevate process ahead of policy.

What really makes one wonder about the affinity felt by certain Jews for Grant was the welcome mat he put out for some of the country’s most pernicious anti-Semites.

With 2013 marking half a century since Kennedy’s fateful limousine ride in Dallas, the current revels are exceeding the revisionist frenzies of years past, with a seemingly endless parade of books, articles and television specials designed to assure us that, despite everything that has come to light about him since his death, JFK was a great president, or at least a very good president who would have been great had his life not been so cruelly cut short.

As someone who for the past fifteen years has been writing a column that largely focuses on the news media, I’ve read what is no doubt an altogether unhealthy number of books on the subject. Most of them were instantly forgettable while some created a brief buzz but failed to pass the test of time. And then there were those select few that merited a permanent spot on the bookshelf.

George W. Bush has been getting some positive media coverage lately, with recent polls showing him at least as popular as his successor, Barack Obama, and a big new book about the Bush presidency by New York Times chief White House correspondent Peter Baker (Days of Fire, Doubleday) portraying Bush as a much more hands-on chief executive than his detractors ever imagined.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/media-monitor/media-monitor-33/2002/03/06/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: